Pennsylvania Court Finds That An Employer’s Take-Home Duty Can Extend To Girlfriends Of Former Employees

by Husch Blackwell LLP

A Pennsylvania District Court recently denied a defendant’s motion for summary judgment of the issue of duty, finding that that an employer’s take home duty may in certain situations extend to the girlfriend of a former employee. Plaintiff Brenda Schwartz and her husband, Paul Schwartz (“Plaintiffs”), brought a negligence action against Defendant Accuratus Corporation (“Defendant”), alleging that Mrs. Schwartz had contracted chronic beryllium disease (“CBD”) from exposure to beryllium brought home on Mr. Schwartz’s clothes while he was an employee of Defendant. Mrs. Schwartz also claims exposure to beryllium from Mr. Schwartz’s roommate, Gregory Altemose, who was also an employee of Defendant. Schwartz v. Accuratus Corporation, No. 12-6189 at *1 (E.D. Pa. 2018).

This case involves a complex and interesting fact pattern. Mr. and Mrs. Schwartz began dating in 1978 when Mr. Schwartz worked for Defendant. In 1979, Mr. Schwartz moved into an apartment on Grant Street with Mr. Altemose. According to the testimony offered in the case, Mrs. Schwartz spent considerable amounts of time at their apartment. Although the defendants disputed her status as an “overnight guest” at the apartment, Mrs. Schwartz frequently stayed at the apartment until the early hours of the morning. In 1980, Plaintiffs married, and Mrs. Schwartz moved into the Grant Street apartment with Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Altemose. Although Mr. Schwartz soon left Defendant, Mr. Altemose continued to work there while the group cohabitated at the Grant Street Apartment.

In August 2012, more than 30 years after Mrs. Schwartz first came into contact with Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Altemose, Mrs. Schwartz was diagnosed with CBD. Shortly afterwards, Plaintiffs filed claims for negligence, loss of consortium, and exemplary damages against Defendant in state court. The case was removed to federal court by the defendants, but the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed the negligence claim against Defendant, holding that the duty of care could not extend to Mrs. Schwartz as either Mr. Schwartz’s girlfriend or as Mr. Altemose’s roommate. Plaintiffs appealed the dismissal, and the Third Circuit certified the following question to the New Jersey Supreme Court: “Does the premises liability rule set forth in Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, 895 A.2d 1143 (N.J. 2006) extend beyond providing a duty of care to the spouse of a person exposed to toxic substances on the landowner’s premises, and, if so, what are the limits on that liability rule and the associated scope of duty?” In response, the New Jersey Supreme Court clarified that Olivo did not establish a bright line rule limiting take home duty to spouses and held that “a refined analysis for a particularized risk, foreseeability, and fairness” must be conducted on a case-by-case assessment in toxic tort settings. The case was then remanded to state court for further consideration.

The Eastern District of Pennsylvania, applying New Jersey substantive law, held that an employer’s duty of care may be extended to the girlfriend of an employee because an employer can reasonably foresee that “virtually all of its employees live with or have repeated close contact with someone.” The Court set forth a three-factor analysis for foreseeability: 1) the relationship of the parties; 2) the opportunity for exposure and the nature of the exposure to the dangerous substance that causes the risk of injury; and 3) the employer’s knowledge of the dangerousness of the exposure, assessed at the time when the exposure to the individual occurred.

The Court conceded that beryllium exposure carries the risk of serious injury and that even a short exposure to beryllium many years ago can result in the development of CBD. As to Defendant’s knowledge of the dangerousness of exposure, the Court held that Defendant may have been aware of the dangerousness of beryllium exposure and the necessary response to prevent the danger. The Court reached this conclusion because “many of [Defendant’s] colleagues, suppliers, and competitors…had already taken steps to keep beryllium dust from leaving the premises on the clothes, hair, or skin of workers.” The Court dismissed Defendant’s argument that expanding this duty of care would result in a “practically limitless” pool of remotely exposed persons, stressing that the relationship between the parties would be dispositive of the issue of duty.

The Court first discussed the relationship between Defendant and Mrs. Schwartz. Although no direct relationship between those parties existed, the Court stated that Defendant “should have been aware” of the dangers of beryllium and the risk of exposure to an occasional visitor to the home of an employee. Although Mrs. Schwartz never had a legal marriage relationship with Mr. Schwartz while he was working for Defendant, the Court stated that the duty-creating relationship threshold must be considered “relatively low” due to the dangerousness of the toxin.

The Court stated that the relationship between Mrs. Schwartz and both Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Altemose was “predictable, regular, and close” such that a take-home duty could be imposed on Defendant. For example, Mrs. Schwartz would frequently socialize with Mr. Schwartz after work, pick him up after work, and spend long hours at the Grant Street apartment. Furthermore, Mrs. Schwartz testified to picking up after Mr. Altemose, handling his work clothes, and washing the roommates’ towels once a week. Mrs. Schwartz also socialized with Mr. Altemose in the common areas of the apartment. Following the Plaintiffs’ marriage, Mrs. Schwartz moved into the Grant Street apartment, and the parties lived together for approximately four years.

Defendant attempted to dispute the closeness of Mrs. Schwartz’s contact with both Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Altemose, arguing that Mrs. Schwartz spent much less time at the Grant Street apartment than was represented, and that the domestic norms in the 1970s and 1980s would have produced less close contact between two parties that were merely dating. The Court dismissed this reasoning, reasserting that “nearly all people at all times have close relationships with others, have regular contact with others in their homes, and in most cases live with others who share space and housework.”

Applying the above-stated analysis, the Court denied Defendant’s motion for summary judgment because “genuine issues of material fact exist regarding Defendant’s take home liability and Mrs. Schwartz’s status as a foreseeable plaintiff.”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Husch Blackwell LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Husch Blackwell LLP

Husch Blackwell LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.