In the absence of federal cleanup standards for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) in groundwater, several states have started the process of regulating PFAS in groundwater themselves. As a result, states have adopted a patchwork of regulations and guidance standards which presents significant compliance challenges to impacted industries. This client alert explores the current landscape of state regulations regarding the guidance, notification, and cleanup levels for PFAS – typically perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (“PFOS”) and perfluorooctanoic acid (”PFOA”) – in groundwater.
Federal Health Recommendations and Advisory
Although no legally binding standards have been issued at the federal level, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has issued two influential documents: (1) Interim Recommendations to Address Groundwater Contaminated with PFOA and PFOS; and (2) a Lifetime Drinking Water Health Advisory Level of 70 ppt for PFOS and PFOA. While EPA’s health advisory level is non-binding, and is primarily intended to address drinking water contamination, several states have nevertheless used the EPA’s recommended 70 ppt as a baseline for establishing groundwater limits, which fortunately does create some regulatory consistency between some states.
State Regulations
The snapshot provided below is current as of July 19, 2021, but it is important to note that this is a rapidly developing regulatory space. Some states, such as North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin have proposed groundwater regulations for PFAS which may take effect soon, and more state actions, as well as possible federal action, are expected to be announced later this year. All of which means that businesses should consider whether they currently use or discharge any PFAS compounds, and if so, evaluate what state regulations may apply, particularly if they operate in any of the below-listed jurisdictions. In addition, owners of property with legacy PFAS use, and prospective purchasers of commercial and industrial properties, should review the most current groundwater quality standards as part of the due diligence process.
Participating States
|
Concentration Level
|
Type of Regulation
|
Adoption Status
|
Illinois
|
2 ppt (stated by the Illinois Pollution Control Agency as 2 ng/L)
|
PFOA (Guidance)
|
Regulation (still in draft form) and Related Information
|
Michigan
|
6 ppt
|
PFNA (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
Michigan
|
8 ppt
|
PFOA (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
New Hampshire
|
11 ppt
|
PFNA (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
New Hampshire
|
12 ppt
|
PFOA (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
New Jersey
|
13 ppt
|
PFNA and PFOS (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
Illinois
|
14 ppt (stated by the Illinois Pollution Control Agency as 14 ng/L)
|
PFOS (Guidance)
|
Regulation (still in draft form) and Related Information
|
New Jersey
|
14 ppt
|
PFOA (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
New Hampshire
|
15 ppt
|
PFOS (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
Minnesota
|
15 ppt
|
PFOS (Guidance)
|
Health Advisory Level
|
Michigan
|
16 ppt
|
PFOS (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
New Hampshire
|
18 ppt
|
PFHxS (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
Massachusetts
|
20 ppt (stated in the regulation as .02 ppb)
|
6 PFAS Substances combined -- PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, PFNA, PFHpA, and PFDA (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
Vermont
|
20 ppt (stated in the regulation as .02 µg/L)
|
5 PFAS substances combined: PFHpA, PFHxS, PFNA, PFOS and PFOA (Notification)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
Minnesota
|
35 ppt
|
PFOA (Advisory)
|
Health Advisory Level (see page 181)
|
Minnesota
|
47 ppt
|
PFHxS (Advisory)
|
Health Advisory Level (see page 180)
|
Michigan
|
51 ppt
|
PFHxS (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
Colorado
|
70 ppt
|
Site-specific Standardfor PFOA and PFOS (Clean Up)
|
Site-Specific Groundwater Quality Standard
|
Delaware, Florida, Montana, and Rhode Island
|
70 ppt
|
Follow the EPA Health Advisory Level: PFOS and PFOA combined (Guidance and Notification)
|
Delaware: Guidance Policy
Florida: Guidance Plan
Montana: Guidance Standard
Rhode Island: Notification Standard
|
Illinois
|
140 ppt (stated by the Illinois Pollution Control Agency as 140 ng/L)
|
PFHxS (Guidance)
|
Regulation (still in draft form) and Related Information
|
Texas
|
290 ppt, etc.
|
16 Different PFAS Substances (Clean Up)
|
Protective Concentration Levels
|
Michigan
|
370 ppt
|
HFPO-DA (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
Michigan
|
420 ppt
|
PFBS (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
North Carolina
|
2,000 ppt
|
PFOA (Guidance)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
Illinois
|
2,100 ppt (stated by the Illinois Pollution Control Agency as 140,000 ng/L)
|
PFBS (Guidance)
|
Regulation (still in draft form) and Related Information
|
Michigan
|
400,000 ppt
|
PFHxA (Clean Up)
|
Regulation and Related Information
|
Alaska
|
400,000 ppt (stated in the regulation as 0.4 µg/L)
|
PFOA and PFOS separately (Clean Up)
|
Regulation (18 AAC 25) and Related Information
|
Maine
|
400,000 ppt (stated in the regulation as 0.4 ppb)
|
PFOA and PFOS separately (Guidance)
Note: Maine has both residential and construction standards
|
Maximum Exposure Guideline
|
Illinois
|
560,000 ppt (stated by the Illinois Pollution Control Agency as 560,000 ng/L)
|
PFHxA (Guidance)
|
Regulation (still in draft form) and Related Information
|
No regulations:
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming
Key:
Notification
|
A corporate representative must inform the appropriate state official that the groundwater is above the stated limit.
|
Guidance
|
These levels are not binding limits, but they can serve as the basis for regulatory action, and are a useful tool for due diligence and risk assessment.
|
Clean Up
|
Investigation and remediation is usually required when concentration levels exceed the clean-up threshold. This is usually expressed by groundwater quality standards that identify specific clean-up criteria.
|
Additional Information
Without federal PFAS standards for groundwater, states have enacted a wide range regulatory concentration levels. For example, for PFAS substances in groundwater, the most stringent concentration is 2 ppt (Illinois; PFOA only) and the most lenient concentration is 560,000 ppt (Illinois; PFHxA only). The following chart illustrates the discrepancies in the concentration levels only for PFOA and/or PFOS.
Conclusion
Businesses operating in the 16 states that have already enacted some form of regulation should consider whether they currently use or discharge any of the regulated PFAS compounds. In addition, owners of property with legacy PFAS use, and prospective purchasers of commercial and industrial properties in these jurisdictions will increasingly need to incorporate the groundwater quality standards as part of their due diligence processes.
[View source.]