Plaintiff Dirties Panera’s ‘Eat Clean’ Claims

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contact

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

A new class action lawsuit filed in California federal court accuses Panera Bread of false advertising based on a campaign promoting the fast-casual restaurant chain as a place to “eat clean.”

Brianna Tabler told the court that while Panera’s new ad campaign—featuring in-store advertisements, bags, signs and labels, along with the use of an “earthy” green and brown color scheme—promotes its food as “clean” and “100% clean,” the food actually contains glyphosate.

For example, signs and placards displayed in Panera’s retail outlets contain statements such as “Food should be clean. No artificial colors, preservatives, sweeteners, flavors, or anything else you wouldn’t want to serve your family.” And bags include statements like “100% clean food: No artificial flavors, sweeteners, preservatives/No colors from artificial sources.”

The national chain is attempting to jump on the clean-eating bandwagon but misrepresents its products (including sandwiches, baked goods and other prepared foods) in the process, Tabler alleged, as they contain the same synthetic biocide residue found in Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer.

“There is a growing desire among consumers to purchase and consume ‘clean’ foods, which consumers understand to be foods free of artificial ingredients, especially pesticides,” according to the complaint. “Panera is deceiving consumers into believing that [its] products are of a higher quality, free from synthetic chemicals, or free from chemical residues from the production process when they are not.”

Tabler purchased a whole-grain bagel on multiple occasions from Panera stores, relying on the “clean” and “100% clean” representations, she told the court.

The putative class action alleges violations of the state’s Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law and Consumer Legal Remedies Act, seeking monetary damages as well as a halt to the allegedly deceptive advertising.

To read the complaint in Tabler v. Panera, LLC, click here.

Why it matters: The challenge to Panera’s “eat clean” and “100% clean” claims brings to mind the continuing class actions over “all natural” advertising claims, which have targeted everything from chips and dip to sunscreen.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contact
more
less

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.