Police Immunity From Civil Liability Resulting From Vehicular Chases

by Low, Ball & Lynch

Rosemary Morgan, et al. v. Beaumont Police Department, et al.

Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District (April 4, 2016)

Police Departments have historically enjoyed statutory immunity from any civil lawsuits resulting from injuries sustained during vehicular chases under the vehicle code.  This case concerns the burden the Police Department must carry to continue to enjoy the statutory immunity under the vehicle code for damage inflicted during vehicular pursuits.

Just before noon on March 17, 2011, Officer Brian Stehli (“Stehli”) was monitoring traffic on a city street when he saw a silver pick-up truck drive by with a large crack in its front windshield and a broken tail light.  Stehli pulled behind the pickup.  After calling in the pickup’s license plate number to dispatch, Stehli activated the lights and used the air horn once on his police cruiser as he followed behind the pickup.  Instead of stopping, however, the driver of the pickup, later identified as Thomas Durnin (“Durnin”), accelerated.  This led to a high speed car chase in which both Durnin and Stehli reached speeds of up to 90 miles per hour.  After a 12-minute car chase, Durnin’s vehicle crossed a double yellow line and crashed head on into another vehicle driven by Mike Morgan.  Mr. Morgan subsequently died from the injuries he sustained in the crash, while Durnin was convicted of second degree murder, among other things.

The widow and daughter of Mr. Morgan filed a complaint, which contained an allegation of wrongful death against the City of Beaumont and the Beaumont Police Department (“BPD”) (collectively “Defendants”).  Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment (“MSJ”) pursuant to Vehicle Code section 17004.7, which immunizes public entities from liability for injuries resulting from police pursuits of suspected criminals.  Defendants stated that they had a “policy and procedure” in place according to the statute regarding vehicle pursuits of suspects.  The trial court granted defendants’ MSJ after finding defendants had a policy and procedure in place and therefore the immunity under section 17004.7 applied.

The Court of Appeal reversed, finding that defendants had failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish as a matter of law that BPD had “promulgated” its vehicle pursuit policy as required under section 17004.7.  First, the Court looked at the statute in question and noted that the statute required that all peace officers certify in writing that they have “received, read, and understood” the policy.

The Court then looked at the holding in Nguyen v. City of Westminster (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 1161 (“Nguyen”).  In Nguyen, an individual was killed after police officers chased a stolen van into a high school parking lot as classes were ending.  The van struck a trash dumpster that hit the decedent.  The Nguyen court “reluctantly” concluded summary judgment was properly granted under the former section 17004.7, which only required a department adopt a policy regarding vehicle chases.  Following Nguyen, the legislature amended  § 17004.7 and the Court examined the legislative history of the amendment.

The Court then turned to the evidence that BPD had submitted in support of their MSJ, which outlined their procedure for promulgating their vehicle chase policy.  BPD declared that they had hired a third party, Lexipool Risk Management Service (“Lexipool”), to assist with policy drafting and adopting.  Once a new policy was created, or revision to a policy was made, BPD would e-mail its officers, notifying them of the change and directing them to access the policy directly through Lexipool, or by accessing the department’s shared drive.  Employees would then acknowledge receipt of the policy by e-mail, although those e-mails were not maintained or preserved.  BPD also declared through one of its officers that the “vast majority” of officers complied with the email acknowledgement described above.  The Court found that evidence of “receipt” of an e-mail was insufficient to meet the requirements of the amended statute that all officers certify they had “received, read and understood” the policies in question.

The Court of Appeal thus held that an agency’s vehicle pursuit policy is not promulgated within the meaning of § 17004.7(b)(2) unless, at a minimum, “all” of its peace officers “certify in writing that they have received, read, and understood the policy.”

The Court declined to address the other ground for the appeal that the BPD training program did not meet the requirements of § 17004.7, which also requires periodic training on the vehicle pursuit policy.

Finally, the Court rejected the BPD’s argument that summary judgment was properly granted because the trial court alternatively found that the accident did not occur as a result of any negligence on the part of the officer as he had terminated the chase before the collision.  The Court ruled that there was a triable issue of fact on this point, as the high speed chase had gone on for 12 minutes, and because Durnin still believed he was being pursued by police at the time of the collision.


For public entities, this case serves as a warning to have a robust policy regarding vehicle pursuits and ensure all your officers receive it, read it, understand it, and undergo periodic training on the pursuit policy.  This will ensure the department enjoys the shield of immunity, while simultaneously – according to the legislature – reduce the number of innocent bystanders needlessly injured in course of vehicular pursuits.

For a copy of the complete decision, see: Morgan v Beaumont PD

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Low, Ball & Lynch | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Low, Ball & Lynch

Low, Ball & Lynch on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.