Polk County Fuel Station/Arkansas Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund: Arkansas Department of Energy & Environment - Division of Environmental Quality Motion for Summary Judgment/Dismissal

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C.

Download PDF

As previously noted in a June 26th post, Mena Short Stop, LLC (“Mena Short Stop”) filed a pleading before the Arkansas Pollution Control & Ecology Commission (“Commission”) addressing an issue arising under the Arkansas Department of Energy & Environment – Division of Environmental Quality’s (“DEQ”) administration of the Arkansas Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund (“Trust Fund”) styled:

Request for Adjudicatory Hearing and Commission Review and for a Declaratory Order (“Request”)

The Request addressed DEQ’s requirement that a regulated storage tank (“Tank”) owner or operator provide evidence that the costs of corrective action for a petroleum release have been paid in full before a claim for reimbursement for the Trust Fund will be considered.

Mena Short Stop argued in part that:

  • DEQ exceeded its legal authority by requiring proof of payment of remediation costs as a condition of receiving reimbursement from the Trust Fund
  • The controlling Arkansas statute specifically does not require payment in full of remediation costs prior to reimbursement from the Trust Fund

DEQ responded on July 26th by filing a Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss arguing in part:

  • No genuine issues as to any material facts exist and DEQ is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law
  • Mena Short Stop has failed to state facts upon which relief can be granted

DEQ’s arguments in support of its Motions include:

  • Issues presented in Mena Short Stop’s Request for Hearing were not ripe for review
    • The DEQ Director has not made a final decision on the application’s reimbursement
    • Mena Short Stop has not been injured by a decision of the DEQ Director
  • Mena Short Stop’s Request for a Declaratory Order is improper
    • Arguing that allegation that Rule 12.308(C)(5) is discriminatory against small, independent owners and was not properly addressed by the Commission in a Declaratory Order
    • The argument that the Trust Fund’s statutory language is analogous to an insurance policy is incorrect
  • Mena Short Stop has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies

A copy of the Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Motion Dismiss can be downloaded here.

Written by:

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C.
Contact
more
less

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide