President Issues Executive Order Changing Process for Hiring ALJs

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC

On July 10, 2018, President Trump issued an Executive Order that allows agency heads to directly hire administrative law judges (ALJs) by excepting them from the federal government’s general competitive service requirements.

The Executive Order comes on the heels of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. SEC, in which the Court held that the SEC’s ALJs are “officers” of the United States who must be appointed in compliance with the Constitution, which for “inferior officers” would generally require appointment by the President or “heads of departments”—in that case, the Commission itself.  Because the ALJ in Lucia had been appointed by other SEC staff members, the Court vacated the ALJ’s decision and remanded the case for a new proceeding.

Previously, the federal government’s nearly 2,000 ALJs, the majority of which are employed by the Social Security Administration, were hired through a competitive examination and competitive service selection procedures administered by the Office of Personnel Management.  Citing Lucia and certain additional policy justifications, such as the need to provide agency heads with additional flexibility, the Executive Order places ALJs into a new category of the “excepted service,” a group of federal employees who are subject to a different hiring process.  For personnel in the excepted service, appointments and position changes generally must be made in accordance with such regulations and practices as the head of the agency concerned finds necessary.  In connection therewith, the Executive Order also specifically requires that all ALJs must at a minimum hold a professional license to practice law and be authorized to practice law under the laws of a state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, or any territorial court established under the United States.

Although the Executive Order appears to have been prompted at least in part by the Lucia decision, it is not entirely clear that all of the steps taken in the Order would have been required in order to comply with the minimum Constitutional requirements at issue in that case.

The Executive Order may be found here.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Weiner Brodsky Kider PC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.