Product Liability Update: July 2018

Foley Hoag LLP
Contact

Massachusetts Federal Court Holds No Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturer Which, Although It Used A Nationwide United States Distributor, Did Not Specifically Target Massachusetts For Sales -

In Preferred Mut. Ins. Co. v. Stadler Form Aktiengesellschaft, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55475 (Mar. 30, 2018), a homeowners’ insurer as subrogee sued the retailer, U.S. distributor and Swiss manufacturer of an air purifier that allegedly caused a fire in the insured’s Massachusetts home in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleging negligence and breach of warranty. The Maine-based retailer and Ohio-based distributor in turn filed cross-claims against the manufacturer, which moved to dismiss all claims, arguing the court lacked personal jurisdiction.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP
Contact
more
less

Foley Hoag LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide