Proposed Anti-Hybrid Regulations under Sections 267A, 245A, and 1503(d)

On December 20, 2018, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and the Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) released proposed “anti-hybrid” regulations (the “Proposed Regulations”) under sections 267A, 245A(e), and 1503(d) of the Internal Revenue Code.[1] Sections 267A and 245A(e) were enacted in 2017 as part of the tax reform act.[2] Very generally, these sections deny U.S. tax deductions associated with a financial instrument, transaction, or entity that is treated differently under the tax laws of the United States and the tax laws of another country. Such an instrument, transaction, or entity is referred to as a “hybrid”; and sections 267A and 245A(e) are referred to as “anti-hybrid” provisions. Hybrids, by exploiting the differences between tax laws, can be used to claim tax benefits in multiple countries or achieve “double nontaxation”.

The Proposed Regulations will generally be retroactively effective from January 1, 2018 if they are finalized by June 22, 2019.[3] If they are not finalized by that date, then they will be effective as of December 20, 2018. The deadline for comments on the Proposed Regulations is February 26, 2019.[4]

This post provides both a summary and detailed explanation of some of the most important aspects of the Proposed Regulations.

Section 267A generally denies a deduction for any “disqualified related party amount” paid or accrued pursuant to a hybrid transaction or paid or accrued either by or to a hybrid entity.[5] A “disqualified related party amount” is any interest or royalty that is paid or accrued to a related party if either (i) the amount is not included in the income of the related party under the tax law of the country of which the related party is a resident for tax purposes or is subject to tax, or (ii) the related party is allowed a deduction with respect to that amount under the tax law of that country.[6] A disqualified related party amount does not include any payment to the extent that the payment is included in the gross income of a United States shareholder as subpart F income under section 952 or as an investment in U.S. property under section 956.[7]

Very generally, a hybrid transaction is a transaction that gives rise to interest or royalties for U.S. federal tax purposes but is not so treated under the tax laws of the foreign recipient.[8] A hybrid entity is one that is treated as “fiscally transparent” in the United States or another jurisdiction, but as a taxable entity in the other.[9] Fiscally transparent generally means that the owners or investors of an entity are taxed on the income earned by the entity rather than the entity itself. The income earned by the entity is not subject to tax at the entity level, but rather flows or passes through to its owners or investors.

Section 245A(e) denies the dividends-received deduction under section 245A(a) for “hybrid dividends”.[10] Section 245A(e) also requires that any hybrid dividend received by a CFC from a lower-tier CFC (a “tiered hybrid dividend”) be treated as subpart F income and included in the gross income of a U.S. shareholder.[11] Any foreign tax credits or foreign tax deductions associated with hybrid dividends or tiered hybrid dividends are also disallowed.[12]

Section 1503(d) generally prevents a corporation that is a tax resident of the United States and another jurisdiction from using a single economic loss to generate deductions that offset income in both jurisdictions (the “dual consolidated loss rules”).

The OECD previously addressed the international tax arbitrage opportunities presented by hybrid transactions and hybrid entities in its proposals under Action 2 of the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (“BEPS”) project.[13] Section 267A grants the Treasury Department broad authority to issue regulations, and the legislative history to section 267A indicates that the section was intended to be consistent with “many of the approaches to the same or similar problems” taken in the BEPS project, bilateral income tax treaties, and provisions or rules of other countries. The Joint Committee on Taxation’s “Blue Book” describing the tax reform act indicates that Treasury’s regulatory authority properly extends to addressing the “overly broad or under-inclusive application” of section 267A.[14]

  • The Proposed Regulations dramatically expand the scope of section 267A beyond the statutory language, based on the broad grant of regulatory authority. If the Proposed Regulations are finalized as proposed, they will represent a reversal of over twenty years of U.S. tax policy that has facilitated cross-border tax arbitrage since the “check-the-box regulations” were finalized in 1996.[15] The Proposed Regulations would effectively prevent much of the arbitrage that the check-the-box regulations permit.
  • The Proposed Regulations do not address all cross-border arbitrage. They limit disallowance under section 267A to (i) deductions for interest and royalty payments to related parties and (ii) arrangements with an unrelated party where the arbitrage is priced into the terms of the arrangement or, the arbitrage is a principal purpose of the arrangement (“structured arrangements”). The Proposed Regulations appear to allow taxpayers to avoid section 267A by “transmutating” interest payments into capitalized depreciation deductions and royalty payments into the cost of goods sold, which do not appear to be subject to limitation. However, the final regulations may change this result.
  • The Proposed Regulations apply to payments that produce a deduction under U.S. tax law, but no corresponding income inclusion under foreign tax law (referred to as a “deduction/no-inclusion” or “D/NI” outcome). However, disallowance under section 267A must result from the hybrid nature of a transaction or arrangement. Section 267A does not disallow a deduction if the deduction/no-inclusion outcome is the result of a feature of foreign tax law unrelated to the hybrid nature of the transaction or arrangement, such as a jurisdiction that does not impose an income tax.
  • The Proposed Regulations limit disallowance under section 267A to (i) a tax resident of the United States, (ii) a CFC for which there is one or more 10% United States shareholders, and (iii) a U.S. taxable branch (each, a “specified party”). However, the Proposed Regulations adopt a very broad definition of interest (corresponding to the very broad definition in the section 163(j) proposed regulations).[16]
  • The Proposed Regulations expand the scope of section 267A to apply to payments to reverse hybrids as well as to timing mismatches of more than 36 months.
  • The Proposed Regulations provide information and reporting requirements for transactions that result in a disallowance under sections 245A and 267A.
  • The Proposed Regulations extend the application of the existing dual consolidated loss rules under section 1503(d) to domestic reverse hybrid entities.

The Proposed Regulations under section 267A disallow deductions of a “specified party” for interest or royalty payments paid or accrued to related parties to the extent that the payment or accrual (a “specified payment”) produces a deduction/no-inclusion outcome as a result of:

  1. a “disqualified hybrid amount”,
  2. a “disqualified imported mismatch amount”, or
  3. an abusive transaction.[17]As mentioned above, a specified party is a U.S. tax resident, a CFC for which there is one or more “10% United States shareholders”[18], or a U.S taxable branch, including a U.S. permanent establishment of a tax treaty resident.[19] A partner in a partnership may be a specified party, but a partnership is not a specified party.[20]
  4. The Proposed Regulations provide a de minimis rule to the effect that deductions are not to be disallowed under section 267A if the sum of the specified party’s interest and royalty deductions (determined without regard to the Proposed Regulations) for a taxable year is less than $50,000.[21]
  5. Each of these three categories is described below.

A.             Disqualified hybrid amounts

Under the Proposed Regulations, a specified payment generally gives rise to a disqualified hybrid amount (and thus is subject to disallowance under section 267A) if the specified payment is:

  1. a payment made pursuant to a “hybrid transaction”,
  2. a disregarded payment in excess of the “dual inclusion income” of a specified party,
  3. a “deemed branch payment”,
  4. a payment to a “reverse hybrid”, or
  5. a “branch mismatch payment”.
  6. Each of these terms is described below.

1.              Payments pursuant to a hybrid transaction

A hybrid transaction is defined under the Proposed Regulations as any transaction, series of transactions, agreement, or instrument one or more payments with respect to which are treated as interest or royalties for U.S. tax purposes, but are not so treated for purposes of the tax law of a recipient of the payment.[22] The classic example is a payment that is treated as interest on debt for U.S. tax purposes, but as a distribution on equity for purposes of the tax law of country where the specified recipient is a tax resident.[23]

A specified payment is deemed to be made pursuant to a hybrid transaction if there is no inclusion by a specified recipient within 36 months from the end of the taxable year in which the specified party would be allowed a deduction.[24]

If a payment is made pursuant to a hybrid transaction, then the payment is a disqualified hybrid amount (that is subject to disallowance under section 267A) to the extent that (i) a “specified recipient” does not include the payment in income, and (ii) this “no-inclusion” is the result of the hybrid nature of the transaction.[25] A specified recipient is, with respect to a specified payment, any tax resident that derives the payment under its tax law or any taxable branch to which the payment is attributable under its tax law.[26]

The requirement that a disqualified hybrid amount be the result of the hybrid nature of the transaction requires a connection or link between the deduction/no-inclusion outcome and the hybrid treatment itself. For example, the Proposed Regulations do not apply to a payment pursuant to hybrid transaction if the deduction/no-inclusion outcome is the result of a foreign tax law that exempts all foreign-source income from taxation, does not have a corporate tax, or classifies the specified party as a tax-exempt entity.[27] Thus, payments to Cayman Island entities would not be treated as disqualified hybrid amounts because the Cayman Islands does not have a corporate income tax.

However, assume that a foreign parent corporation in a jurisdiction with a participation exemption owns a Cayman Island entity that is treated as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes, but as a flow-through entity under the tax law of the foreign parent’s country, and the Cayman Island entity owns a U.S. corporation. If the U.S. corporation makes a payment to the Cayman entity on an instrument that is treated as debt for U.S. tax purposes, but as equity under the tax law of the foreign parent’s country, both the Cayman entity and the foreign parent would be treated as specified recipients of the payment because they derive the payment under the tax law of their respective countries. Although the payment does not give rise to a deduction/no-inclusion outcome with respect to the Cayman entity (because the Cayman Islands does not have an income tax), the payment would produce a deduction/no-inclusion outcome with respect to the foreign parent because the hybrid nature of the instrument results in the foreign parent’s participation exemption. Therefore, the payment would constitute a disqualified hybrid amount, and the interest deduction of the U.S. corporation would be disallowed.

Finally, the Proposed Regulations do not cover transactions that result in double-deduction outcomes (i.e., transactions where a single payment gives rise to a deduction for two different taxpayers in two different jurisdictions). However, as discussed below, the dual consolidated loss rules do apply to certain double-deduction outcomes.[28]

2.              Disregarded payments

A disregarded payment is a payment that (i) is disregarded under the foreign tax law of a tax resident or taxable branch receiving the payment, but that (ii) would be included in the tax resident’s or the taxable branch’s income (as interest or a royalty) if the payment were regarded under that country’s tax law.[29] For example, if a U.S. entity makes an interest payment to a foreign parent in a jurisdiction that does not regard the payment because it treats the U.S. payor as a disregarded entity, but that would require the foreign parent to include the payment as interest income if the transaction were regarded, the interest payment would be a disregarded payment. Disregarded payments result in deduction/no-inclusion outcomes because, as a result of being disregarded, they give rise to a deduction in the country of the payor, but do not produce an offsetting inclusion in the country of the recipient. A deemed branch payment (as discussed below) is not a disregarded payment.[30]

Specified payments pursuant to a purchase-repurchase (“repo”) transaction or other similar transaction where legal title to property is transferred and the property is reacquired or expected to be reacquired in the future are excluded from the definition of disregarded payments.[31] Instead, if a specified payment is made pursuant to a repo transaction or other similar transaction and is disregarded under a foreign tax law, but another amount connected to the payment (the “connected amount”) is regarded under such foreign tax law, the identity of the specified recipient of the specified payment is determined under foreign tax law with respect to the connected amount. In addition, if the specified recipient includes the connected amount, then the amount of the specified recipient’s no-inclusion with respect to the specified payment is correspondingly reduced.[32]

Under the Proposed Regulations, a specified party’s “disregarded payments” give rise to a disqualified hybrid amount to the extent that these payments exceed the total amount of that party’s “dual inclusion income” in a taxable year.[33]

Dual inclusion income is defined as a specified party’s total income or gain for U.S. tax purposes during a taxable year to the extent included in income of the tax resident or taxable branch receiving the disregarded payments, over the specified party’s total deductions or losses for U.S. tax purposes (other than for disregarded payments) to the extent these items are allowable as deductions under the tax law of the tax resident or taxable branch receiving the disregarded payments.[34]

3.              Deemed branch payments

A deemed branch payment is any amount of interest or royalties allowable as a deduction in computing the business profits of the U.S. permanent establishment of a treaty resident under an income tax treaty between the United States and the treaty country to the extent that the amount is deemed paid to the home office (or other branch of the home office) and is not regarded (or otherwise taken into account) under the tax law of the home office (or the other branch).[35] For example, a deemed branch payment may arise where a U.S. branch office that constitutes a permanent establishment pays royalties to its home office and those royalties are allowable as a deduction in computing the business profits of the U.S. permanent establishment under the income tax treaty between the United States and the country of the home office.[36]

If a specified payment is a deemed branch payment, the payment is a disqualified hybrid amount if the tax law of the home office country provides an exclusion or exemption for income attributable to the branch.[37]

4.              Payments to a reverse hybrid

A reverse hybrid is any entity that is “fiscally transparent” under the tax law of the country in which it is established, but not fiscally transparent under the tax law of an investor of the entity.[38]

A payment made to a reverse hybrid is a disqualified hybrid amount to the extent that the investor does not include the payment in income, and this no-inclusion is a result of the payment being made to the reverse hybrid.[39] For this purpose, an investor’s no-inclusion is a result of the payment being made to the reverse hybrid only to the extent that the no-inclusion would not have occurred if the investor’s tax law had treated the reverse hybrid as fiscally transparent and the payment as interest or royalty income.[40]

5.              Branch mismatch payments

A specified payment is a branch mismatch payment if the payment is treated as income attributable to a branch of a home office under the tax law of home office’s country, and either (i) the branch is not a taxable branch or (ii) the payment is not treated as income attributable to the branch under the tax law of the branch’s country.[41] A branch mismatch payment gives rise to a disqualified hybrid amount only to the extent that the home office does not include the payment in income, and this no-inclusion is the result of the payment being a branch mismatch payment.[42] For this purpose, the home office’s no-inclusion is a result of the specified payment being a branch mismatch payment only to the extent that the no-inclusion would not occur if the tax law of the home office’s country treated the payment as interest or royalty income that is not attributable to a branch of the home office.[43]

6.              Amounts not treated as disqualified hybrid amounts

The Proposed Regulations provide that a tentative disqualified hybrid amount is generally reduced to the extent (i) the amount is included in the income of a U.S. tax resident or U.S. taxable branch, (ii) the amount is included in a United States shareholder’s gross income as subpart F income, or (iii) the amount is included in a United States shareholder’s income under the GILTI rules.[44]

7.              Structured arrangements

The Proposed Regulations provide that disqualified hybrid amounts arise only with respect to specified payments pursuant to (i) transactions that involve parties related to a specified party[45] and (ii) “structured arrangements”.[46] A structured arrangements is an arrangement involving an unrelated party where the hybrid mismatch is priced into the terms of the arrangement or, based on the totality of the circumstances, the hybrid mismatch is a principal purpose of the arrangement.[47]

B.             Disqualified imported mismatch amounts

Even if a specified payment does not give rise to a disqualified hybrid amount, under the Proposed Regulations, the specified payment is disallowed if the payment constitutes a “disqualified imported mismatch amount”.

A specified payment is treated as a disqualified imported mismatch amount to the extent that the income attributable to the payment is directly or indirectly offset by a “hybrid deduction” that is incurred by a taxable person that is related to the specified party.[48] A hybrid deduction is generally an amount for which a foreign tax resident or taxable branch is allowed an interest or royalty deduction under its tax law to the extent the deduction would be disallowed if that tax law contained rules substantially similar to those in the Proposed Regulations under section 267A.[49] A deduction allowed to a tax resident with respect to equity, such as a notional interest deduction, may also be a disqualified imported mismatch amount.[50] The Proposed Regulations provide a series of ordering and funding rules to determine whether a hybrid deduction directly or indirectly offsets income attributable to a specified payment.[51]

The underlying principle of these rules is that a deduction/no-inclusion outcome may occur as a result of an offshore hybrid arrangement that is imported into the United States through a non-hybrid arrangement. By taking into account the overall effect of multiple transactions that produce a deduction/no-inclusion outcome, the rules are intended to prevent taxpayers from using these arrangements to circumvent the application of section 267A.

For example, assume a foreign parent corporation that is a tax resident of Country X wholly owns both a U.S. corporation and a foreign subsidiary that is a tax resident of Country Y. In year one, the U.S. corporation makes a $100 payment to the foreign subsidiary on an instrument that is treated as indebtedness under U.S. tax law and Country Y tax law (i.e., the instrument is not a hybrid instrument). As a result, the foreign subsidiary includes the payment in income as interest, and the U.S. corporation would be allowed a deduction (absent the Proposed Regulations under section 267A). In the same year, the foreign subsidiary makes a $100 payment to its foreign parent on an instrument that is treated as equity under Country X tax law, but as debt under Country Y tax law (a hybrid instrument). Furthermore, assume that Country X tax law contains a participation exemption for dividends from foreign subsidiaries. Therefore, the second payment is deductible for the foreign subsidiary and not included in the income of the foreign parent. The first payment by the U.S. corporation to the foreign subsidiary is not a disqualified hybrid amount because the underlying instrument is not hybrid. However, the payment would be a disqualified imported mismatch amount because, while it is not a hybrid instrument, the interest income to the foreign subsidiary on the first instrument is offset by the deduction for the payment to the foreign parent on the second instrument, and this deduction would be disallowed if Country Y had rules similar to those in the Proposed Regulations (as the payment would constitute a disqualified hybrid amount). Therefore, the U.S. corporation’s deduction on the first instrument would bedisallowed as a disqualified imported mismatch amount.

C.             Anti-abuse rule

Under the Proposed Regulations, a specified party’s deduction may be disallowed under section 267A if (i) a payment is not included in the income of a tax resident or taxable branch and (ii) a principal purpose of the plan or arrangement is to avoid the purposes of the Proposed Regulations.[52]

D.             Definitions

For purposes of the Proposed Regulations, interest is any amount paid, received or accrued as compensation for the use or forbearance of money under the terms of an instrument or contractual arrangement that is treated as indebtedness under the Code, or an amount that is treated as interest under the Code. These items include original issue discount, qualified stated interest, acquisition discount, amounts treated as interest in certain integrated transactions, and accrued market discount.[53] This definition corresponds to the broad definition of interest in the recently proposed regulations under section 163(j). For instance, interest includes certain amounts that are closely related to interest and that affect the economic yield or cost of funds of a transaction involving interest, but that may not be compensation for the use or forbearance of money on a stand-alone basis or otherwise treated as interest under general principles.[54]

A royalty is generally defined under the Proposed Regulations as any amount paid or accrued as consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright, patent, trademark, secret formula or process, other similar property (including goodwill) or any information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience other than payments for after-sale services, services rendered under a warranty, pure technical assistance, or an opinion given by an engineer, lawyer, or accountant.[55]

By limiting specified payments to interest and royalties, the Proposed Regulations appear to allow U.S. taxpayers to achieve deductions or the economic equivalent by converting interest and royalty deductions to other deductible or excludible amounts that, technically, do not constitute interest or royalties for U.S. tax purposes.

For example, assume a U.S. corporation pays interest to a related foreign party under circumstances that would cause the deduction to be disallowed under the Proposed Regulations, but the U.S. corporation uses the loan to construct a building and the interest deductions are capitalized into the cost of the building and thereby give rise to increased depreciation deductions. Because the Proposed Regulations deny deductions only for specified payments, which are defined as “any interest or royalty” paid or accrued with respect to a specified party,[56] and the U.S. corporation would deduct only depreciation, it appears that the U.S. corporation’s deductions would not be disallowed under the Proposed Regulations.

Likewise, assume that a U.S. corporation makes royalty payments to a related foreign party under circumstances that would cause the deduction to be disallowed under the Proposed Regulations, but the U.S. corporation uses the intellectual property to manufacture goods and the royalty expense becomes a component of the cost of goods sold. Again, because the U.S. corporation would not claim a royalty deduction, it appears that the U.S. corporation’s deductions would not be disallowed under the Proposed Regulations. These and similar “transmutation” situations may be addressed when the Proposed Regulations are finalized, and the final regulations may disallow the U.S. tax benefit, even if it is no longer treated as interest or royalties.[57]

A.             Definition of a hybrid dividend

As mentioned above, section 245A(e) denies the section 245A 100% dividends-received deduction for “hybrid dividends”, and any foreign tax credits or foreign tax deductions with respect to hybrid dividends. Under the Proposed Regulations, a hybrid dividend is a dividend that is otherwise eligible for the section 245A 100% dividend-received deduction, but for which the CFC is or was allowed a “hybrid deduction”.

A hybrid deduction is a deduction or other tax benefit allowed under a “relevant foreign tax law” that relates to an amount paid, accrued or distributed with respect to an instrument that is issued by a CFC and treated as equity for U.S. tax purposes.[58] This deduction gives rise to a deduction/no-inclusion outcome because the CFC is entitled to a deduction under relevant foreign tax law, but absent section 245A(e), would not be taxable by the United States (by reason of the 100% dividends-received deduction). For example, a hybrid deduction arises if an equity investment in a CFC is treated as debt in the CFC’s resident country (thus giving rise to an interest deduction) and as equity in the United States. If the foreign country has hybrid mismatch rules that deny a deduction for payments on a hybrid instrument in order to prevent a deduction/no-inclusion outcome, then there is no hybrid deduction (and therefore the 100% dividends-received deduction would be permitted) because the deduction is not “allowed.”[59] A deduction or other tax benefit is treated as a hybrid deduction only if it relates to a payment on an instrument of the CFC that is treated as stock for U.S. tax purposes.[60] For example, hybrid deductions (subject to disallowance of the 100% dividends-received deduction) include dividends-paid deductions and notional interest deductions allowed on equity under the tax law of the CFC’s resident country, but do not include exemptions provided to a CFC for branch profits under its tax law because there is no connection between the tax benefit and the hybrid instrument.[61]

B.             Distributions of PTEP

The Proposed Regulations clarify that hybrid dividends generally do not include distributions from a CFC to a United States shareholder out of previously taxed earnings and profits (“PTEP”), because PTEPs are generally ineligible for the section 245A deduction.[62] This exclusion covers both distributions of PTEP received by the United States shareholder directly and dividends received by lower-tier CFCs.[63]

C.             Tiered hybrid dividends

Hybrid dividends include amounts received by a CFC from another CFC to the extent that the amounts would be hybrid dividends under the Proposed Regulations if the receiving CFC were a domestic corporation (“tiered hybrid dividends”). The Proposed Regulations clarify that this treatment applies notwithstanding any other provision of the Code. Thus, if one CFC makes a hybrid dividend payment to another CFC, but the dividend would not be subpart F income by reason of the earnings and profits limitation under section 952(c), the “same country” exception for income received from related persons under 954(c)(3), or the look-through rule for related CFCs under section 954(c)(6), the payment will still be treated as a tiered hybrid dividend and thus treated as subpart F income of the receiving CFC, includible in the gross income of a U.S. shareholder (i.e., the domestic corporation that owns both the receiving CFC and the paying CFC), and ineligible for any foreign tax credits or foreign tax deductions.[64] Furthermore, if gain recognized by a CFC on the sale or exchange of stock in another foreign corporation that is treated as a dividend under section 964(e) also constitutes a tiered hybrid dividend, the tiered hybrid dividend rules apply before section 964(e) so that no section 245A deduction or foreign tax credits or deductions is allowed for that amount.[65]

D.             Hybrid deduction accounts

A payment by a CFC that is treated as a dividend for U.S. tax purposes may not give rise to the corresponding hybrid deduction until a later time, as a result of differences in recognition, accounting methods, or other timing rules.[66] The Proposed Regulations reflect this concept by requiring “specified owners” to maintain a perpetual “hybrid deduction account” with respect to each share of CFC stock for which a section 245A deduction may be available upon a distribution on the share.[67] The hybrid deduction account is maintained in the “functional currency” of the CFC and tracks the amount of hybrid deductions of the CFC that are allocated to the share based on the relative value of the CFC’s stock.[68] The account is increased by the amount of hybrid deductions of the CFC allocable to a share for a taxable year and decreased by the amount of hybrid deductions in the account that gave rise to a hybrid dividend or tiered hybrid dividend during a taxable year.[69]

When a distribution is made by a CFC to a shareholder that maintains a hybrid deduction account with respect to the CFC, the dividend is treated as a hybrid dividend and no section 245A deduction, foreign tax credits, or foreign tax deductions are available with respect to the dividend. As mentioned, the hybrid deduction account is correspondingly reduced by the amount of hybrid deductions that give rise to the hybrid dividend or tiered hybrid dividend. The Proposed Regulations provide that the distribution is treated as a hybrid dividend or a tiered hybrid dividend to the extent of the balance in all of the shareholder’s hybrid deduction accounts with respect to the CFC, even if the dividend is paid on a share that has not had any hybrid deductions allocated to it.[70] This approach prevents taxpayers from structuring dividend payments so that they are made only on shares of stock to which a hybrid deduction has not been allocated.

E.             Transfers of stock with a hybrid deduction account

The Proposed Regulations also include rules to ensure that section 245A(e) properly applies to dividends that give rise to a deduction/no-inclusion outcome where the receiving shareholder is different than the shareholder that held the stock when the hybrid deduction arose. These rules apply only when stock is transferred among parties that are required to maintain hybrid deduction accounts. If a specified owner transfers a share of stock with a positive balance in its hybrid deduction account to another shareholder that is also a specified owner immediately after the acquisition, then the balance in the hybrid deduction account transfers with the share to the new specified owner.[71] If the acquirer is not a specified owner immediately after the transaction, then the hybrid deduction account is eliminated.[72] However, an anti-avoidance rule provides that, if a transaction or arrangement is undertaken with a principal purpose of avoiding section 245A(e), “appropriate adjustments” (including disregarding the transaction or arrangement) will be made.[73] On a section 332 liquidation by a CFC with a hybrid deduction account to an upper-tier CFC, the upper-tier CFC increases its hybrid deduction account accordingly.[74] The Proposed Regulations include similar rules for reorganizations and recapitalizations.[75]

F.             Distributions to which the Proposed Regulations apply

The Proposed Regulations generally apply to distributions made after December 31, 2017.[76]

The Proposed Regulations require taxpayers to report specified payments for which a deduction is disallowed under section 267A and hybrid dividends (including tiered hybrid dividends) under section 245A(e) in accordance with sections 6038 and 6038A. Taxpayers are required to report this information on the appropriate reporting forms for accounting periods or tax years (as applicable) beginning after December 20, 2018. For hybrid dividends under section 245A(e), a CFC paying the dividends must report such dividends on Form 5471.[77] For specified payments under section 267A, the reporting requirements depend on the tax characteristics of the party making the payment. If the payor is a CFC, then it must report the specified payment on Form 5471.[78] If the payor is a 25% foreign-owned U.S. corporation, then the information is reported on Form 5472.[79] If the payor is a controlled foreign partnership, the controlling 50% partner must provide the information on Form 8865.[80]

As mentioned above, the Proposed Regulations under section 267A do not cover hybrid transactions that generate deductions in the United States and another jurisdiction because these transactions are addressed separately by other provisions and doctrines in the Internal Revenue Code, such as the dual consolidated loss rules under section 1503(d). The Proposed Regulations also include proposed changes to the dual consolidated loss rules.[81]

The dual consolidated loss rules generally prevent a corporation that is considered a tax resident of two jurisdictions from using a single economic loss to offset income in both jurisdictions. Under section 1503(d), a dual consolidated loss may not reduce the taxable income of a domestic affiliate for any taxable year. This use of a dual consolidated loss is referred to as a “domestic use”.

A dual consolidated loss is generally defined as any net operating loss of a domestic corporation that is subject to an income tax of a foreign country on its worldwide income without regard to the source country of the income, or is subject to tax on a residence basis.[82] If a taxpayer makes a “domestic use election” certifying that there has not been and will not be a “foreign use” of the dual consolidated loss during a certain period, then the general prohibition against the domestic use of a dual consolidated loss is lifted.[83] A foreign use of a dual consolidated loss generally occurs when any portion of the dual consolidated loss is made available to offset the income of a foreign corporation or the direct or indirect owner of a hybrid entity.[84]

Prior to the Proposed Regulations, an entity classified as a “domestic reverse hybrid” was not subject to the general prohibition on the domestic use of dual consolidated losses because a domestic reverse hybrid was not subject to tax under foreign tax law on a worldwide basis or residence basis.[85] Domestic reverse hybrid entities could result in double-deduction outcomes because the deductions they incurred could offset income for both U.S. and foreign tax purposes.

The Proposed Regulations eliminate this possibility by proposing changes to the regulations under section 1503(d) and the check-the-box rules under section 7701 providing that any U.S. entity electing to be classified as a corporation under the check-the-box rules must consent to being treated as a “dual resident corporation” for purposes of the dual consolidated loss rules under section 1503(d) for taxable years in which (i) a foreign resident corporation derives income, gain, deduction or loss through the electing domestic entity, and (ii) the foreign resident corporation is related to the electing domestic entity.[86] When these conditions are satisfied, the electing entity will become subject to the dual consolidated loss rules and any double-deduction outcome created through the use of such an entity will be disallowed.[87]

The Proposed Regulations apply to a U.S. entity that elects to be treated as a C corporation on or after December 20, 2018.[88] They also apply to an entity that elects to be treated as a C corporation prior to December 20, 2018, by deeming the entity to consent to being subject to the dual consolidated loss rules under 1503(d) as of its first taxable year beginning on or after December 20, 2019 unless the entity elects, effective before December 20, 2019, to be treated as a partnership or disregarded entity.[89]


[1] Rules Regarding Certain Hybrid Arrangements [REG-104352-18], 83 Fed. Reg. 67612 (Dec. 28, 2018). All references to section numbers are to the Internal Revenue Code or the Proposed Regulations.

[2] Pub. L. No. 115-97, 115 Stat. 2054 (2017).

[3] 83 Fed. Reg. at 67624.

[4] 83 Fed. Reg. at 67624.

[5] Section 267A(a).

[6] Section 267A(b). A related party means a related party as defined under section 954(d)(3) (more than 50% control by total combined voting power or value), except that section 954(d)(3) is applied with respect to the payor of interest or royalties in lieu of the CFC otherwise referred to in that section.

[7] Section 267(b)(1) (flush language).

[8] Section 267A(c).

[9] Section 267A(d).

[10] Section 245A allows U.S. corporations a 100% dividends-received deduction for the foreign-source portion of dividends received from a controlled foreign corporation (a “CFC”) of which the U.S. corporation owns at least 10% of the vote or value of the CFC’s shares. A CFC is a foreign corporation that is owned 50% or more (total combined voting power or value) by U.S. shareholders, which are U.S. persons that own stock representing 10% or more of the combined voting power or value of a foreign corporation. Sections 951(b), 957(a).

[11] Section 245A(e)(1), (2).

[12] Section 245A(e)(3).

[13] See OECD, Neutralising the Effects of Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements, Action 2: 2015 Final Report (October 2015), http://www.oecd.org/ctp/neutralising-the-effects-of-hybrid-mismatch-arrangements-action-2-2015-final-report-9789264241138-en.htm.

[14] Joint Comm. Tax’n, General Explanation of Public Law 115-97 at 390 (2018), https://www.jct.gov/publications.html?func=startdown&id=5152.

[15] Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3.

[16] An in-depth discussion of the proposed regulations under section 163(j) can be found here.

[17] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-1(b).

[18] A United States shareholder is, with respect to a foreign corporation, a U.S. person who owns 10% or more of the total combined voting power or value of the foreign corporation. Section 951(b). Stock that is held directly, indirectly through foreign parties, or constructively through certain related parties is taken into account for purposes of determining whether a U.S. person is a United States shareholder. Section 958. However, at least 10% of the stock of a CFC must be held directly or indirectly by one or more United States shareholders for the CFC to qualify as a specified party.

[19] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-5(17).

[20] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-5(17). For a payment made by a partnership, a U.S. corporate partner is a specified party and its allocable share of the deduction for the payment is subject to disallowance under section 267A.

[21] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-1(c).

[22] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(a)(2).

[23] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(a)(2).

[24] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(a)(2).

[25] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(a)(1).

[26] There may be multiple specified recipients with respect to a specified payment and the determination is made without regard to whether a tax resident is a resident of a country that has an income tax treaty with the United States. Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-5(a)(18). A tax resident is a body corporate or other entity or body of persons liable to tax under the tax law of a country as a resident. Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-5(a)(23). A taxable branch is a branch that has a taxable presence under its tax law. Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-5(a)(22).

[27] 83 Fed. Reg. at 67613. Absent this rule, the statutory language of section 267A could deny a deduction for a payment made to a hybrid entity that is a resident of a jurisdiction with no income tax where the deduction/no-inclusion outcome occurs simply by reason of the foreign jurisdiction’s tax law (and not the hybrid nature of the transaction). The statute could also deny a deduction where a payment is subject to tax in a foreign country. For instance, a royalty payment made to a hybrid entity in the United Kingdom that qualifies for a reduced tax rate under the U.K. patent box regime could be denied a deduction under section 267A. Alternatively, assume a U.K. entity is a limited liability partnership (LLP) that defaults to a corporation under the U.S. check-the-box regulations and further assume that the partners of the LLP are U.K. residents subject to tax on their share of the LLP’s income. Section 267A could disallow a deduction for any U.S. source interest or royalty payments to the LLP even though the U.K. partners include the payments in income.

[28] 83 Fed. Reg. at 67615.

[29] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(b)(2).

[30] Prop. Reg. §§ 1.267A-2(b)(2); 1.267A-2(b)(2).

[31] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(b)(2).

[32] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(a)(3).

[33] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(b)(1).

[34] For example, assume a foreign parent wholly owns a U.S. entity that is disregarded for purposes of the tax law of the foreign parent’s country. During year one, the U.S. entity pays $100 to the foreign parent pursuant to a debt instrument. This amount is treated as interest under U.S. tax law, but is disregarded under foreign tax law, which views the transaction as involving a single taxpayer. During the same year, the U.S. entity’s has $125 of gross income and $60 of deductible expense. The $125 of gross income is included in the foreign parent’s income, and the $60 of expense is allowed under the foreign country’s tax law. The U.S. entity qualifies as a specified party and is thus subject to disallowance under section 267A. The payment is a disregarded payment because the transaction is disregarded under the foreign country’s tax law, but the payment would have been included in the foreign parent’s income as interest income if the transaction were regarded. The excess of the $100 payment over the U.S. entity’s dual inclusion income for year one is a disqualified hybrid amount. The U.S. entity’s dual inclusion income is $65 ($125 included in the foreign parent’s income less $60 expense allowed against the foreign parent’s income). Therefore, the disqualified hybrid amount is $35 (the excess of $100 over $65). See Prop. Reg. 1.267A-6(c)(3), Example 3.

[35] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(c)(2). In a normal situation, where a foreign corporation is a resident of a country that has entered into an income tax treaty with the United States, the United States is generally permitted to impose tax on the foreign corporation’s “business profits” only if the corporation’s business operations constitute a permanent establishment within the United States. A foreign corporation generally has a permanent establishment if it has a fixed place of business within the United States (subject to exceptions) or operates through a dependent agent that habitually exercises the authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the corporation within the United States.

[36] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(c)(2). Assume a foreign corporation has a U.S. taxable branch. Under an income tax treaty between the United States and the foreign corporation’s resident country, the U.S. taxable branch is a U.S. permanent establishment, and $25 of royalties are allowable as a deduction in computing the business profits of the U.S. taxable branch and are deemed paid to the foreign corporation. Under the tax law of the foreign corporation’s resident country, the $25 of royalties are disregarded. Therefore, the $25 payment is a specified payment that is a deemed branch payment and the entire $25 payment is a disqualified hybrid amount for which a deduction is disallowed under the Proposed Regulations because the tax law of the foreign corporation’s resident country provides an exclusion or exemption for income attributable to a branch. See Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-6(c)(4)(iii), Example 4.

[37] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(c)(1).

[38] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-5(a)(8); see also Treas. Reg. § 1.894-1(d)(3)(ii)-(iii).

[39] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(d).

[40] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(d)(1)(ii). Assume that a foreign parent corporation located in Country X wholly owns a U.S. corporation and a foreign corporation located in Country Y. The foreign subsidiary is fiscally transparent for Country Y tax purposes but is not fiscally transparent for Country X tax purposes. In year one, the U.S. corporation pays $100 to the foreign subsidiary, which is treated as interest for U.S. tax purposes and Country X tax purposes. The U.S. corporation is a specified party for purposes of the Proposed Regulations and its deduction for the $100 payment is subject to disallowance under section 267A. The payment by the U.S. corporation is made to a reverse hybrid because the foreign subsidiary is fiscally transparent under Country Y tax law (the tax law where the foreign subsidiary is established) but is not fiscally transparent under Country X tax law (the tax law of an investor, the foreign parent). There is a no-inclusion outcome because the foreign parent does not derive the $100 payment under Country X tax law (as the foreign subsidiary is not fiscally transparent under such law) and therefore does not include any of the payment in income. Thus, the foreign parent’s $100 no-inclusion gives rise to a disqualified hybrid amount to the extent that it is a result of the payment being made to the reverse hybrid. The entire $100 no-inclusion is a result of the payment being made to the reverse hybrid because, if the foreign subsidiary were treated as fiscally transparent under Country X tax law, the foreign parent would include $100 in income, and consequently, the no-inclusion would not occur. Thus, the U.S. corporation’s entire $100 deduction with respect to the payment is denied under the Proposed Regulations. See Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-6(c)(5), Example 5.

[41] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(e)(2).

[42] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(e)(1). Assume that a foreign parent located in Country X wholly owns a U.S. corporation and a foreign subsidiary located in Country Y. The foreign subsidiary owns a branch in Country Z that gives rise to a taxable presence in Country Z under Country Y tax law but not under Country Z tax law. In year one, the U.S. corporation pays $100 to the foreign subsidiary and this amount is treated as a royalty for U.S. and Country Y tax purposes. Under Country Y tax law, the $100 is treated as income attributable to the branch and is excluded from the foreign subsidiary’s income because Country Y tax law exempts branch profits from taxation. The U.S. corporation is a specified party for purposes of the Proposed Regulations and its deduction for the $100 payment is subject to disallowance under section 267A. The U.S. corporation’s payment is a branch mismatch payment because the payment is treated as income attributable to a branch under Country Y tax law, and the branch does not give rise to a taxable presence under Country Z tax law (and thus is not a taxable branch). Because of the branch profits exemption under Country Y tax law, the foreign subsidiary does not include any of the payment in income, and thus there is a $100 no-inclusion outcome with respect to the foreign subsidiary. The $100 no-inclusion gives rise to a disqualified hybrid amount to the extent that it is a result of the payment by the U.S. corporation being a branch mismatch payment. The entire $100 no-inclusion is a result of the payment being a branch mismatch payment because if the payment were not treated as attributable to the branch for Country Y tax purposes, the foreign subsidiary would include the $100 in income. Therefore, the U.S. corporation’s deduction with respect to the payment to the foreign subsidiary is disallowed under the Proposed Regulations. See Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-6(c)(6), Example 6.

[43] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(e)(1)(ii).

[44] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-3(b).

[45] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(f).

[46] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-2(f).

[47] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-5(a)(20).

[48] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-4(a).

[49] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-4(b).

[50] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-4(b).

[51] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-4(c).

[52] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-5(b)(6).

[53] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-5(a)(12); Prop. Reg. § 1.163(j)-1(a)(20).

[54] These amounts include (i) income, deduction, gain, or loss from transactions used to hedge interest-bearing assets or liabilities, (ii) substitute interest payment, (iii) commitment fees, (iv) debt issuance costs, (v) guaranteed payments for the use of capital, and (vi) the time value component of a non-cleared swap with significant nonperiodic payments. Prop. Reg. § 1.163(j)-1(b)(20).

[55] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-5(a)(16). This definition is consistent with the meaning of the term under Article 12 of the 2006 U.S. Model Income Tax Convention.

[56] Prop. Reg. § 1.267A-1(b).

[57] Payments that are included in the cost of goods sold or otherwise reduce gross receipts are not treated as base erosion payments that are subject to the base erosion anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”) under section 59A. Section 59A(d)(4), Preamble to the Proposed Regulations under Section 59A, REG-104259-18. However, capitalized payments that give rise to depreciation and amortization deductions are treated as base erosion payments that are subject to the BEAT when they give rise to depreciation or amortization. Section 59A(d)(2). Section 267A does not have a provision that is analogous to section 59A(d)(2).

[58] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(d)(2)(i). “Relevant foreign tax law” means any country that imposes an income, war profits or excess tax with respect to income of the CFC, other than a foreign anti-deferral regime under which an owner of the CFC is liable to tax. For example, a relevant foreign tax law includes the tax law of a foreign country of which the CFC is a tax resident (“CFC country”), as well as the tax law applicable to a foreign branch of the CFC. Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(f)(4).

[59] 83 Fed. Reg. at 67613.

[60] 83 Fed. Reg. at 67613.

[61] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(d)(2)(i)(B). Foreign currency gain or loss with respect to a deduction or other tax benefit is taken into account for purposes of determining hybrid deductions. Prop. Reg. § 1.245A-1(d)(6). Thus, if a payment by a CFC gives rise to foreign currency gain or loss to the CFC under a foreign tax law similar to section 988, then that foreign currency gain or loss would be taken into account. (Section 988 provides rules for the recognition of gains or losses associated with foreign currency transactions.)

[62] Distributions out of PTEP have already been included in a U.S. shareholder’s gross income under section 951(a) and are thus excluded from such shareholder’s gross income when they are subsequently distributed under section 959(a). Furthermore, they are not treated as dividends (other than to reduce earnings and profits) under section 959(d) so they are not eligible for the section 245A deduction. See 83 Fed. Reg. 67613.

[63] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(c)(2).

[64] 83 Fed. Reg. at 67613.

[65] Under certain circumstances, section 964(e) (i) treats gain recognized by a CFC on the sale or exchange of stock in another foreign corporation as a dividend and as subpart F income of the selling CFC, (ii) requires a U.S. shareholder of the CFC to include in its gross income its pro rata share of the subpart F income, and (iii) allows the U.S. shareholder a section 245A deduction for its inclusion in gross income.

[66] 83 Fed. Reg. at 67614.

[67] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(d)(1). A specified owner of a CFC is (i) a domestic corporation that is a U.S. shareholder of the CFC or (ii) an upper-tier CFC that would be a U.S. shareholder of the CFC if it were a domestic corporation. It also includes persons who own shares directly or indirectly through a partnership, trust, or estate. Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(f)(5).

[68] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(d)(4)(i). Functional currency is generally the currency of the economic environment in which a significant part of a business’ activities are conducted and which is used by the business to keep its books and records. See section 958(b).

[69] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(d)(4)(i).

[70] Assume, for example, that a domestic corporation holds two types of shares of equal value of a foreign corporation that is a CFC. Share A is a treated as a debt in the foreign country and as equity in the United States (and is thus a hybrid instrument) and Share B is treated as equity in both countries. During year one, the foreign corporation accrues $80 of interest to the domestic corporation with respect to share A and is allowed a deduction under the foreign country’s tax law. During year two, the foreign corporation distributes $30 to the domestic corporation with respect to each type of share. Absent section 245A(e), the domestic corporation would be permitted a section 245A deduction for both distributions. The entire amount of each dividend received by the domestic corporation from the foreign corporation during year two is a hybrid dividend under the Proposed Regulations because the total of the domestic corporation’s hybrid deduction accounts with respect to each of its shares of stock in the foreign corporation at the end of year two ($80 for Share A + $0 for Share B = $80) is at least equal to the amount of the dividends ($60). Therefore, a section 245A deduction is denied with respect to both dividends, even though there are no hybrid deductions allocated to Share B. See Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(g)(1), Example 1.

[71] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(d)(4)(ii)(A).

[72] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(d)(4)(ii)(A).

[73] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(e).

[74] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(d)(4)(ii)(B)(2). A section 332 liquidation is generally defined as a liquidation in which a 80% or more owned subsidiary is liquidated into its parent.

[75] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(d)(4)(ii)(1), (3).

[76] Prop. Reg. § 1.245A(e)-1(d)(2)(ii)

[77] Prop. Reg. § 1.6038-2(f)(14).

[78] Prop. Reg. § 1.6038-2(f)(13).

[79] Prop. Reg. § 1.6038A-2(b)(5)(iii).

[80] Prop. Reg. § 1.6038-3(g)(3).

[81] The Proposed Regulations under 1503(d) supplement the substantial existing dual consolidated loss rules, which are not discussed in detail here.

[82] Section 1503(d)(2).

[83] Treas. Reg. § 1.503(d)-6(d).

[84] Treas. Reg. § 1.503(d)-3(a).

[85] A domestic reverse hybrid is a domestic entity that, with respect to the item of income, is treated as not fiscally transparent for U.S. tax purposes and as fiscally transparent under the laws of the owner’s jurisdiction.

[86] Prop. Reg. §§ 1.503(d)-1(b)(2)(iii), (c); 1.503(d)-3(e)(3); 301.7701-3(a), (c)(iii).

[87] For example, assume a foreign corporation wholly owns a U.S. entity that elects to be treated as a U.S. C corporation, but is treated as fiscally transparent under the tax law of the resident country of the foreign corporation. In year one, the foreign corporation has only $60 income and the domestic entity has only $100 deduction (resulting in $100 net loss for the domestic corporation in year one). By electing to be treated as a U.S. C corporation, the domestic entity consents to be treated as a dual resident corporation subject to the DCL rules. For year one, the domestic entity is treated as a dual resident corporation because the foreign corporation derives or incurs items of income, gain, deduction, or loss of the domestic entity (given that the domestic entity is fiscally transparent under the foreign tax law). Because the loss is available to offset income of the foreign corporation under foreign country tax law, there is a foreign use of the dual consolidated loss in year one. Thus, the $100 dual consolidated loss is subject to the domestic use limitation rule. The result is the same if (i) the foreign corporation holds its interest in the domestic entity through an intermediary that is fiscally transparent under the foreign tax law or (ii) an individual wholly owns the foreign corporation and the foreign corporation is a disregarded entity. See Prop. Reg. § 1.1503(d)-7(c)(41), Example 41.

[88] Prop. Reg. § 301.7701-3(c)(3)(iii).

[89] Prop. Reg. § 301.7701-3(c)(3)(ii).

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Proskauer - Tax Talks | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Proskauer - Tax Talks
Contact
more
less

Proskauer - Tax Talks on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.