Protective Refund Claims in Light of Pending Moore v. United States Decision

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact

Taxpayers, including some of the firm’s current and former clients, may be affected by the outcome of the Supreme Court case Moore v. United States, which will address the constitutionality of the Section 965 “Transition Tax,” enacted as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017. The petitioners in Moore are individual shareholders of an Indian company who had not received distributions from the company during the period of their investment, but who paid the Transition Tax on their proportionate share of the company’s reinvested earnings. The petitioners sued for a refund, arguing that the Transition Tax is unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court opinion that ruled against the taxpayers, but the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact
more
less

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide