Review Of Compulsory Licensing In Australia

by FPA Patent Attorneys

A Productivity Commission Inquiry into Compulsory Licensing of Patents has released a Report recommending that the overlap that exists with the Competition and Consumer Act be removed from the Patents Act and that the “reasonable requirement of public” test be replaced with a new “public interest” test.

The Productivity Commission Inquiry Report into Compulsory Licensing of Patents was released on 27 May 2013. The purpose of the inquiry was to assess the impacts and mechanisms of the Patent Act’s compulsory licensing safeguard. The Productivity Commission also considered the Crown use provisions, which have been adopted in the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill 2013 that was introduced into Parliament on 30 May 2013. Refer to our related article - Proposed changes to Crown use in Australia.

Current provisions

Under the Patents Act 1990 patent owners can be compelled to license their patent in a limited range of circumstances under Section 133. The Federal Court may make an order if satisfied that:

  1. all the following conditions exist:
    1. the applicant has tried for a reasonable period, but without success, to obtain from the patentee an authorisation to work the invention on reasonable terms and conditions; 
    2. the reasonable requirements of the public with respect to the patented invention have not been satisfied; 
    3. the patentee has given no satisfactory reason for failing to exploit the patent; or 
  2. the patentee has contravened, or is contravening, Part IV of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 or an application law (as defined in section 150A of that Act) in connection with the patent. 

Under Section 135, the reasonable requirements of the public are to be taken not to have been satisfied if:

  • an existing trade or industry in Australia, or the establishment of a new trade or industry in Australia, is unfairly prejudiced, or the demand in Australia for the patented product, or for a product resulting from the patented process, is not reasonably met, because of the patentee’s failure:
    • to manufacture the patented product to an adequate extent, and supply it on reasonable terms; or
    • to manufacture, to an adequate extent, a part of the patented product that is necessary for the efficient working of the product, and supply the part on reasonable terms; or
    • to carry on the patented process to a reasonable extent; or
    • to grant licences on reasonable terms; or
  • a trade or industry in Australia is unfairly prejudiced by the conditions attached by the patentee to the purchase, hire or use of the patented product, the use or working of the patented process; or
  • if the patented invention is not being worked in Australia on a commercial scale, but is capable of being worked in Australia.

No compulsory licenses have ever been granted in Australia; this may be due to it being a rarely needed safeguard or because it involves a costly and time consuming process with the Federal Court. Whilst the Productivity Commission considered alternatives, they concluded that there were none that would be significantly less costly and time consuming without also reducing the quality of the outcomes and increasing the scope for appeals.

Key findings of the Productivity Commission and recommendations

Anticompetitive behaviour overlap

Finding: There is an unnecessary overlap between the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cwlth) and the Patents Act 1990 (Cwlth) in relation to anticompetitive behaviour.

Recommendation: deletion of s133(2)(b) from the Patents Act – such that one must rely on the Competition and Consumer Act for a compulsory licence order based on restrictive trade practices of a patent holder.

Replacement of reasonable requirements test

Finding: The current language in Section 135 of the Patents Act regarding “reasonable requirements of the public” does not necessarily focus on the interests of the community as a whole.

Recommendations: replace “reasonable requirement of public” test with a new public interest test, which should specify that a compulsory licence would be available if the following conditions are met:

  • Australian demand for a product or service is not being met on reasonable terms, and access to the patented invention is essential for meeting this demand;
  • the applicant has tried for a reasonable period, but without success, to obtain access from the patentee on reasonable terms and conditions;
  • there is a substantial public interest in providing access to the applicant, having regard to:
    • benefits to the community from meeting the relevant unmet demand;
    • commercial costs and benefits to the patent holder and licensee from granting access to the patented invention;
    • other impacts on community wellbeing, including those resulting from greater competition and from the overall effect on innovation.

The Productivity Commission also recommended that the “new provisions should require the Federal Court to set the terms of the licence, including – where the parties cannot reach agreement – any remuneration, consistent with the public interest, having regard to the rights of:

  • the patentee to obtain a return on investment commensurate with the regulatory and commercial risks involved
  • the public to the efficient exploitation of the invention.”

What’s next?

The Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill 2013 did not incorporate these proposed amendments, however they may be considered in future law amendments.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© FPA Patent Attorneys | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

FPA Patent Attorneys

FPA Patent Attorneys on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.