Second Circuit: Reclassification of Claim as Equity Interest? Not Unless It Is Duplicative

by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

The Bottom Line
The Second Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy and district courts’ decisions subordinating claims asserted against the Debtor by holders of restricted stock units. However, while the court agreed with the lower courts that the claims must be subordinated under section 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, the court did not agree that all of the claims must also be disallowed as equity interests. The decision provides a thoughtful analysis of what constitutes an equity interest versus a claim, although the conclusion was to subordinate the claims to general unsecured creditors anyway.

What Happened?
In In re Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., 2017 WL 1718438 (2d Cir. May 4, 2017), the Debtor’s former employees filed proofs of claim seeking cash payments equivalent to amounts previously paid to them in the form of restricted stock units (RSUs) as part of their compensation. The RSUs were contingent rights to own shares of the Debtor’s common stock that would vest after five years. During the five-year holding period, the shares of common stock were held in a trust for the benefit of RSU holders.

The documents governing the RSUs required the Debtor only to deliver the stock and expressly provided that the Debtor was not obligated to pay any cash in respect of the RSUs. The documents also contained subordination provisions, which dictated that RSU claims asserted against the Debtor in bankruptcy should be subordinated under section 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and should be afforded the same priority as equity interests. Finally, the trust agreement provided that all assets held in the trust (including shares of common stock) were subject to the claims of general creditors in bankruptcy.

Each of the RSU holders who filed claims held RSUs that had not yet been converted into common stock when the Debtor filed its chapter 11 petition. The Debtor filed objections to the RSU claims, seeking to disallow the claims as equity interests or, alternatively, to subordinate the claims to those of general unsecured creditors.

The Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York sustained the Debtors’ objections to the RSU claims on the grounds that the claims must be disallowed as equity interests and, alternatively, found that, as claims, they must be subordinated under section 510(b). On appeal, the District Court for the Southern District of New York affirmed the decision on both grounds.

While the Second Circuit agreed with the lower courts’ findings that the RSU claims must be subordinated under section 510(b), it did not agree that all of the RSU claims should be disallowed and characterized as equity interests. Citing In re USA Commercial Mortg. Co., 377 B.R. 608, 615 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2007), the court opined that a proof of claim can only be disallowed as an equity interest if it is duplicative of an interest in an equity security. It follows, the court explained, that if the holder of an equity interest asserts a claim based on a fraud or breach of contract that occurred in connection with its purchase of the equity interest, such claim is distinct from the claimant’s underlying equity interest and thus could not be reclassified as an equity interest. Here, the court found that some of the RSU holders’ claims allege that the Debtor breached a contractual obligation by failing to pay them cash on account of RSUs that did not vest. These claims, the court concluded, are not “duplicative” of equity interests the RSUs may have represented and therefore would not be disallowed even if the underlying RSUs were deemed equity securities. In essence, these were independent claims albeit based upon the RSUs. Because not all claims could be reclassified as equity interests, the court found it unnecessary to determine whether an RSU constituted an “equity security” (as defined in the Bankruptcy Code).

Upon reviewing the case law and legislative history relevant to section 510(b), and thus whether any claim stood on equal footing with other unsecured claims, the court broadly construed each prong of the statute and found that the RSU claims must be subordinated – that is, the claims “arose from the purchase or sale of a security.” The court’s analysis is described below:

Security – An RSU is a “security” because (1) it is adequately covered by the broad language used to define “security” in the Bankruptcy Code, and (2) it “bear[s] many of the hallmark characteristics of a security,” including limited voting rights and the receipt of dividends in the form of additional RSUs. Most importantly, the value of the RSUs were tied to the value of the Debtor’s common stock, and thus holders of RSUs had the same risk and benefit expectations as holders of common stock.

Purchase or Sale – Applying the interpretation of “purchase” set forth in In re Enron Corp., 341 B.R. 141, 151 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006), the receipt of RSUs in exchange for labor constituted a “purchase” for purposes of section 510(b). Cases regarding involuntary exchanges are inapposite because the claimants here were free to refuse the award of RSUs by leaving the company.

• Arising From – The RSU claims “arose from” securities transactions because they would not have existed but for the claimants’ agreement to receive part of their compensation in the form of RSUs.

As a result of its analysis, the court held that the RSU claims “arose from the purchase or sale of securities” and therefore must be subordinated under section 510(b).

Why This Case Is Interesting
The Second Circuit’s decision clarifies the narrow scope of claims that may be reclassified as equity and disallowed and suggests that courts should employ a more careful analysis to determine the bases for claims asserted by equity holders. Going forward, courts will be more likely to focus on whether an equity holder’s proof of claim is duplicative of its equity interest or if it instead reflects an independent claim that is related to, but different from, its underlying equity interest (e.g., a breach of contract claim related to the purchase of the equity security).

However, the practical impact of this decision may not be very significant in the end because these claims will often still be subordinated given the broad construction of section 510(b). Nevertheless, better to be subordinated than disallowed as at least subordinated claims will be entitled to a recovery in circumstances where general unsecured creditors are paid in full and subordinated claims must be paid in full before equity holders receive any distributions. 

Written by:

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.