Securities and Corporate Governance Update – August 2018

by Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

This newsletter discusses noteworthy updates, key regulatory decisions and upcoming compliance reminders. In this edition, we review:

SEC Continues Focus on Executives Perquisites

Enforcement Against Insider Trading Remains a Point of Emphasis for the SEC

Scaled Disclosure Accommodation Extended to Broader Range of Smaller Reporting Companies; Minor Changes to Cover Pages to SEC Periodic Reports and Registration Statements

SEC Commissioner Calls for Changes to Discourage Insider Sales During Stock Buybacks

Implications of In re Investors Bancorp on Outside Director Equity Compensation

SEC Adopts Amendments to Simplify and Update Disclosure Requirements


SEC Continues Focus on Executive Perquisites

By William Cole and Jake Greenberg

The SEC continues to focus on improper disclosure of executive perquisites.  Recently, settlements in two additional SEC enforcement actions involving perks were announced.  These actions are consistent with a recent focus by the SEC in this area.

Recent Perk Cases

In July 2018, the SEC issued a cease-and-desist finding involving The Dow Chemical Company relating to allegedly undisclosed perks.  As in some other recent cases, the order included a monetary penalty ($1.75 million) and required the retention of a consultant for a period of at least one year.  In another recent action, the SEC charged the former CEO of Energy XXI, Ltd., an oil and gas company, with perk violations as well as allegations involving undisclosed personal loans and related party transactions.  Other recent cases are discussed in in our February 2018 edition, here.

The Dow case did not allege executive misconduct.  Rather, it alleged the failure to properly account for and to disclose approximately $3 million in perks.  The SEC alleged that the company inappropriately applied a “business purpose” standard in evaluating perks instead of the SEC’s more rigorous “integrally and directly related” standard.  The perks at issue appear relatively common and included travel to outside board meetings, sporting events, club memberships, limited use of personal assistant office time and membership fees to sit on a charitable board. The SEC’s requirement of an independent consultant to review policies and controls emphasizes the SEC’s focus on companies having proper disclosure controls and procedures and training.

Integrally and Directly Related Standard

In the Dow case the SEC alleged that Dow applied the incorrect standard in determining whether an item is a perk.  In determining whether an item is a disclosable perk, the SEC applies a two-step analysis (see Securities and Exchange Commission, “Executive Compensation and Related Person Disclosure,” Release Nos. 33-8732A, 34-54302A, File No. S7-03-06 (Aug. 29, 2006), at 74) (emphasis added):

  • An item is not a perquisite or personal benefit if it integrally and directly related to the performance of the executive’s duties.
  • Otherwise an item is a perquisite or personal benefit if it confers a direct or indirect benefit that has a personal aspect, without regard to whether it may be provided for some business reason or for the convenience of the company, unless it is generally available on a non-discriminatory basis to all employees.

If an item is "integrally and directly" related that ends the analysis.  For example, a car used for business travel, regardless of the type of car, would not generally be a perquisite because the car is both integral and directly related to the performance of the executive’s duties. The business purpose test applied by Dow was originally considered by the SEC but ultimately not adopted in 2006. The integrally and directly related standard is a stricter threshold.

Complaint Involving Energy XXI

The Energy XXI case focused on the conduct of the company’s former CEO, John Schiller Jr.  That case involved undisclosed perks, including a private bar stocked with liquor and cigars, personal use of company aircraft and shopping trips, among others.   The SEC also accused Mr. Schiller of financing “an extravagant lifestyle” by intermingling his personal finances with company finances, leading to a failure to report related person transactions, including loans from vendors and a prospective board member.  Although the company did not appear to have knowledge of the loans, the SEC did note that a director and officer (“D&O”) questionnaire was not timely completed. 

Company Disclosure Controls

Recent SEC cases reinforce the need for robust controls and procedures to ensure proper evaluation and disclosure of perks.  Proper procedures help reduce the likelihood of a disclosure issue but also may help reduce the severity of any penalty for an improper disclosure.  Recent cases emphasize the need for focus and training about the “integrally and directly related” standard and the importance of timely completion of D&O questionnaires or other controls that would identify issues concerning perks. 

As we have noted previously, other controls or training areas that may be considered include:

  • tracking personal use of company assets (such as tickets for entertainment events);
  • developing a methodology for calculating the aggregate incremental cost of perks;
  • ensuring that the compensation committee approves all aspects of compensation, including perks;
  • implementing a requirement to pre-approve perks and utilize a cost limit; and
  • ensuring that an internal or external audit team reviews the company’s proxy disclosures and underlying support documentation.

For more information on recent perk cases and more detail on potential controls for companies to consider see our article from February 2018, here.

Enforcement Against Insider Trading Remains a Point of Emphasis for the SEC

By Enrique Miranda and R. Randall Wang

Illegal insider trading refers to the buying and selling of securities while in possession or aware of material, nonpublic information in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust or confidence.  The SEC  believes that such trading undermines investor confidence in the fairness and integrity of the markets, and recent cases indicate that the detection and prosecution of insider trading remain one of its enforcement priorities.

Late last year, Christopher J. Lollar, a petroleum engineer, settled SEC charges of insider trading. Lollar, an engineer for energy company Apache Corporation (“Apache”), became aware of a major oil and gas discovery through his work and purchased a number of Apache shares and call options before the public announcement of the discovery. After the announcement, Lollar sold the shares and options, resulting in alleged profits of $214,295. As part of the settlement with the SEC, Lollar agreed to disgorge the alleged profits, plus interest, and pay a civil penalty of $214,295.

In another case that settled earlier this year, Yao Li, a former executive for Alliance Fiber Optics Products, Inc. (“AFOP”), was alleged to have made a profit of approximately $200,000 by engaging in short sales and sales of already owned shares prior to three disappointing earnings announcements. The SEC used various data analysis tools to detect suspicious patterns, such as improbably successful trading in advance of earnings announcement over time. As an executive, Li learned through regular meetings that AFOP was likely to miss the revenue guidance in three different quarters. Additionally, AFOP had a policy which specifically prohibited its employees from engaging in short selling. In addition to a cease and desist order, Li agreed to disgorge $196,203, plus interest, and pay a civil penalty of $196,203. As part of his settlement, Li also agreed to a five-year prohibition on acting as an officer or director of a public company.

In late June 2018, three friends were charged with insider trading. Sebastian Pinto-Thomaz, an analyst for a credit agency, learned of the confidential plans for Sherwin-Williams Co. to acquire The Valspar Corp. through his work and then tipped two of his friends, Abell Oujaddou and Jeremy Millul, who purchased Valspar securities prior to the announcement of the acquisition. Following the announcement, Oujaddou and Millul sold their holdings, generating profits of almost $300,000.  Along with the charges brought by the SEC, the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York brought criminal charges against Pinto-Thomaz, Oujaddou, and Millul.

More recently, Rep. Chris Collins, along with his son Cameron and the father of his son’s girlfriend, Stephen Zarsky were indicted on insider trading charges, and concurrently charged by the SEC.  Collins, a director of Innate Immunotherapeutics, an Australian biotech company, allegedly shared confidential information regarding Innate’s failed clinical trial results with family and friends.  Cameron Collins and Zarsky are charged with selling Innate shares before the public announcement of the negative clinical trial results and avoiding losses of more than $700,000, as well as tipping others on the basis of the material, nonpublic information.  After the announcement, the company’s stock price dropped by more than 92 percent. 

Although Rep. Collins did not sell shares himself, he is alleged to have breached his duty of confidentiality to the company and to have received a personal benefit from his tip of material, nonpublic information to his son Cameron by providing a gift of information to a close relative.  Similarly, Cameron Collins and Zarsky are alleged to have received a personal benefit from such tip, to have improperly traded while aware such information was material and nonpublic, and to have personally benefited by tipping other relatives and friends.

The SEC also settled charges with Lauren Zarsky, Cameron Collins’ girlfriend, and her mother, Dorothy Zarsky, for trading on the basis of material, nonpublic information. Lauren Zarsky agreed to disgorge $19,440, plus interest, and pay a civil penalty of $19,440.  Dorothy Zarsky agreed to disgorge $22,600, plus interest, and pay a civil penalty of $22,600. Lauren Zarsky, a CPA, also agreed to be suspended from appearing or practicing before the SEC as an accountant, which includes a prohibition on participating in the financial reporting or audits of public companies.

In light of these cases, companies should consider reviewing their insider trading policies, as discussed in our last newsletter, including the scope of restricted participants and training and education programs. In addition to criminal charges, insider trading penalties can results in large monetary fines as well as cease and desist orders and officer or director bars. 

Scaled Disclosure Accommodation Extended to Broader Range of Smaller Reporting Companies; Minor Changes to Cover Pages to SEC Periodic Reports and Registration Statements

By Kaitlyn Pettet and R. Randall Wang

The SEC approved amendments to the definition of “smaller reporting company” (an “SRC”) increasing the public float threshold (the cap on portion of shares held by public investors) to $250 million, up from the prior $75 million threshold.  An issuer with a public float of less than $700 million may also qualify for SRC status under the amended rule if its annual revenues are less than $100 million. 

No change was made to the exclusion of issuers that are an investment company, an asset-backed issuer, or a majority-owned subsidiary of a parent that is not an SRC.

Benefits of SRC Status

The less rigorous reporting requirements for SRC’s provide a number of benefits to qualifying companies.  The SEC noted in its proposed rule that extending SRC status to a greater number of registrants may encourage companies that have been hesitant to go public to do so, thus increasing capital formation.  SRC status significantly reduces filing and audit expenses for qualifying companies.  An ICBA study estimates that SRC status—thus exemption from the 404(b) reporting requirements—could cut audit fees for certain types of qualifying institutions by as much as 50%.   Some of the reduced filing requirements for SRCs are the following:

  • Audited historical financial statements:
    • Two years of income statements (rather than three)
    • Two years of cash flow statements (rather than three)
    • Two years of changes in stockholders’ equity (rather than three)
  • Acquired company financial statements – maximum of two years (rather than three)
  • Pro forma financial statements – fewer circumstances when required
  • Two-year MD&A comparison (rather than three)
  • Two years of summary compensation data (rather than five)
  • Three named executive officers (rather than five)
  • No requirement to provide:
    • Selected or supplementary financial data
    • Risk factors in periodic reports
    • Stock performance graph
    • Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
    • Executive compensation analysis, certain stock award tables, pension or deferred compensation benefits tables or pay ratio disclosure
    • Compensation committee report

However, SRCs are subject to some additional disclosure requirements. For example, for related-person transactions, the threshold is the lesser of $120,000 or 1% of total assets, rather than the $120,000 threshold under S-K Item 404, and the disclosure must go back two years. SRCs are also subject to additional Item 404 disclosure requirements relating to the company’s parent and related persons receiving underwriting compensation.

Methods of Calculation

A company’s public float, the total market value of the company’s outstanding common stock (voting and non-voting) held by non-affiliates or non-insiders, is the amount reflected on the first page of the company’s 10-K as the “aggregate market value of the common stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant.”   The public float is measured as of the last business day of the most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the last sale price or the average of the bid and asked prices in the principal trading market.  For an initial registration statement, a registrant must choose a date that is within 30 days of the filing to determine SRC eligibility.

A company’s “annual revenues” for the $100 million SRC limit calculation is the total revenues as presented on the income statement for the most recently completed fiscal year for which audited financial statements are available. If the company is a financial institution however, it must calculate its gross revenues earned from traditional banking activities.

A company that determines it does not qualify under the new calculation of smaller reporting company will remain unqualified until it meets the subsequent qualification thresholds at the 80% level: (i) public float of less than $200 million, if it previously had $250 million or more; or (ii) less than (a) $80 million of annual revenues, if it previously had $100 million or more and (b) $560 million of public float, if it previously had $700 million or more. 

For the first fiscal year after September 10, 2018, existing public companies may qualify by applying the new initial qualification thresholds rather than the lower subsequent qualification thresholds.

Other Changes

The annual revenues threshold for financial statements of acquired businesses was increased from $50 million to $100 million, and as a result acquirers (including non-SRCs) may omit the earliest of the three fiscal years of audited financial statements of such businesses.

The new rule also eliminated the exclusion of SRCs from the accelerated filer and large accelerated filer definitions so as to maintain the current thresholds at which companies are subject to those requirements, including the timing of the filing of periodic reports and Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  As a result, some registrants may qualify as both and SRC and an accelerated filer. 

Finally, the new rule includes minor changes to the cover pages of registration statements and periodic reports (to remove the parenthetical next to the “non-accelerated filer” definition), including Forms 10-K and 10-Q, as of the September 10, 2018 effective date of the amended rules.  A registrant should now check all applicable boxes, e.g., both the Smaller Reporting Company box and the Non-Accelerated Filer box, as appropriate.

The adopting release, including the list of the scaled disclosure requirements for SRCs and changes to the cover pages of SEC forms can be found here.

SEC Commissioner Calls for Changes to Discourage Insider Sales During Stock Buybacks

By Cortney Patterson and Paul William

In a June 2018 speech, SEC Commissioner Robert Jackson, Jr. took aim at insiders’ sales of stock during corporate stock buyback programs and called for an open comment period on SEC rules governing “safe harbors” for stock buybacks.  Jackson’s speech suggested he believed that executives who authorize stock buybacks and then sell their personal shares during such repurchase programs may act to undermine the incentive structure that is theoretically inherent to stock-based compensation – the creation of long-term, sustainable value.  His concern is that stock buybacks, which generally boost the current stock price, reflect a short-term focus at the expense of innovation and the generation of long-term shareholder value.

Jackson’s statement may have been in response to the latest proliferation of share repurchase programs in the U.S.  In the first quarter of 2018 alone, American corporations bought back $178 billion in stock.  As reported by Forbes, publicly-traded U.S. companies are currently on track to repurchase $1 trillion worth of their own shares in 2018.

The following results were reported from research conducted by Mr. Jackson’s staff, which studied 385 buybacks over a fifteen-month period prior to January 2018:

  • In about half of those buybacks, at least one executive, committee member or director of a public company sold shares in the month following the buyback announcement.
  • Twice as many companies have insiders selling in the eight days after a buyback announcement as sell on an ordinary day.
  • On average, in the days before a buyback announcement, insiders trade in relatively small amounts (less than $100,000 worth).
  • During the eight days following a buyback announcement, insiders on average sell more than $500,000 worth of stock each day.

Though Jackson’s study leaves many unanswered questions, his speech indicates that stock buyback rules may become a focus for the SEC.

Jackson proposed a dual approach to revising the SEC’s current buyback rules – expanded committee disclosure and limiting the application of existing stock buyback safe harbors.

Jackson recommended new procedures and requirements for compensation committees, essentially requiring them to review and approve the extent that insiders will be permitted to participate in a buyback.  Jackson’s proposal would also require disclose of the committee’s decision to investors, along with an explanation of why the decision is in the company’s long-term interests.  Following the committee’s decision and its disclosure, Jackson suggested that it may be appropriate to restrict the availability of the Rule 10b-18 safe harbor to any company that permits executives to sell stock following a stock buyback announcement.  Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provides certainty from charges of illegal market manipulation for companies and their affiliated purchasers when the company or its affiliates repurchase the company’s shares of common stock in compliance with the Rule.  A board would be forced to choose between the certainty afforded stock repurchases made in compliance with Rule 10b-18 and denying insiders the right to sell shares earned as compensation.

Other data points highlight the growing focus on stock buybacks.  For example, in June 2018, 21 Democratic U.S. Senators asked the SEC to examine its current rules around stock buybacks and to revisit Rule 10b-18.  There has also been a trend for certain shareholder activists in recent years to submit shareholder proposals calling to exclude the impact of stock buybacks from performance metrics used in determining executive compensation.

Future debate may attempt to analyze other important avenues of inquiry, such as the impact of corporate stock ownership guidelines and the different roles of board members and executive officers in making decisions about stock buybacks.  While we wait, in light of the current attention being paid to the issue of share buyback programs by regulators and legislators alike, it may be prudent for directors to evaluate their companies’ current policies and practices, if any, with respect to stock repurchase programs and executive participation specifically.

Implications of In re Investors Bancorp on Outside Director Equity Compensation

By Robert Endicott and Laura Venn

Companies should consider a December 2017  Delaware Supreme Court decision, In re Investors Bancorp, Inc. Stockholder Litigation, when structuring equity incentive plans, as the case may result in additional challenges to director compensation.  The Delaware Supreme Court held that where (1) a stockholder-approved equity incentive plan allows significant discretion to the directors in awarding compensation under the plan and (2) stockholders properly allege that the directors breached their fiduciary duties when exercising such direction, the directors’ actions will be subject to “entire fairness” review, rather than the more deferential “business judgment” rule.  

Typically, the actions of the board of directors are subject to the business judgment rule when “a fully informed, uncoerced, and disinterested majority of stockholders approve the board’s authorized corporate action” – the so-called “ratification defense.”  The Delaware Supreme Court noted that the ratification defense has been recognized in matters involving three different types of stockholder-approved equity incentive plans: 

  • Specific awards to directors as approved by the stockholders;
  • Self-executing plans (i.e., the directors have no discretion when making the awards); and
  • Plans that allow directors to exercise discretion and determine the amounts and terms of awards after stockholder approval.

The plan in question in In re Investors Bancorp fell within the third category.  Prior to this case, a series of Delaware Chancery Court decisions suggested that directors could retain their discretion to make awards after stockholder plan approval, but that if such a plan contained “meaningful limits” on the awards directors could make to themselves, then the ratification defense could be successfully asserted (and the business judgement rule applied) if the awards were challenged.  In In re Investors Bancorp, the Delaware Supreme Court addressed this notion by articulating that the directors must exercise such discretion in accordance with their fiduciary duties. Therefore, even if stockholders approve the general parameters of an equity incentive plan, if stockholders can properly allege that the directors’ exercise of discretion within those parameters constituted a breach of their fiduciary duties, the directors then must demonstrate that their actions were entirely fair to the company. 

It is worth noting the particular facts of the case, as they arguably are outside the parameters of “meaningful limits.” As a result, the implications of the holding are not entirely clear for stockholder approved equity incentive plans that allow director discretion going forward.  First, prior to approval of the plan, the stockholders were told that awards under the plan would be made to incentivize future performance; however, the board instead used the awards to reward past efforts.  Second, the rewards were 10 to 20 times higher than the compensation paid to the directors the prior year, 10 times higher than director compensation at similarly sized companies that year, and 8 times higher than director compensation at much larger companies that year.  Third, the CEO received an award under the plan that was 3,683% higher than the median award other companies granted their CEOs, and the COO received an award 5,384% higher than the median award to executives at other companies.

Despite the “inordinately” high awards that set the facts of this case apart, boards of directors should still implement best practices when structuring equity incentive plans in light of the In re Investors Bancorp decision.  Such practices include: 

  • Implementing equity incentive plans that provide for specific awards to directors or that are self-executing to ensure the availability of the ratification defense in the event a stockholder challenge to the plan.
  • Structuring equity incentive plans that allow for director discretion to include specific limits on amounts of cash and equity compensation that each director may be awarded annually in order to minimize director discretion.
  • Establishing a robust process for board determinations of awards, as well as maintaining a clear and detailed record that documents how the board determined such awards and how the awards compare to past compensation and peer companies’ compensation.
  • Increased scrutiny by the board’s compensation consultant of the equity incentive plan to determine the appropriate amount of director cash and equity compensation.

SEC Adopts Amendments to Simplify and Update Disclosure Requirements

On August 17, 2018, the SEC adopted amendments to eliminate or modify certain disclosure requirements that have become redundant, overlapping, outdated or superseded in light of other SEC rules, GAAP or changes in the information environment. The changes affect several disclosure requirements in Regulations S-K and S-X and various SEC forms. The SEC also referred certain proposed changes to the FASB for further consideration. Please see our Client Alert here for additional information.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at:

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.