Sixth Circuit Joins Other Circuits in Expanding Definition of Sex Discrimination Under Title VII

Reminger Co., LPA

Originally published in the Louisville Bar Association's Bar Briefs, June 2018 issue. Reprinted with permission.


Several federal circuit courts, including the Second, Fourth, Sixth and Seventh Circuits, have recently expanded the meaning of protection from discrimination based on one’s sex, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, relating to sexual orientation and being transgender.  These cases represent a shift in the way courts historically viewed discrimination based on sex, and make clear that sex discrimination now includes discrimination based upon sexual orientation and/or being transgender.  Recently, the Sixth Circuit also addressed this question, and whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act excuses otherwise impermissible gender discrimination against an employee who announces an intention to transition to another gender.  This article will explain the Sixth Circuit’s ruling on both issues, and discuss best practices for employers in the wake of this and other rulings expanding the definition of sex discrimination under Title VII.

EEOC v. R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 5720, *1 (6th Cir. March 7, 2018).[1]

Aimee Stephens (formerly known as Anthony Stephens) was hired by R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. (“the Funeral Home”) as an apprentice in October 2007. In April 2008, Stephens was promoted to the position of Funeral Director/Embalmer. Stephens held that job until August 2013.  During this time, Stephens lived and presented as a man and was known by her birth name as William Anthony Beasley Stephens.

By way of background, the Funeral Home is a closely held for-profit corporation that is primarily owned and operated by Thomas Rost.  The Funeral Home “is not affiliated with any church; it does not claim to have a religious purpose in its articles of incorporation; it is open every day including Christian holidays; and it serves clients of all faiths.”  Id. at *6.  However, Rost describes himself as a long-practicing Christian and stated that he believes “God has called him to serve grieving people.”  Id. at *6.  Rost further stated that he “sincerely believes that the Bible teaches that a person’s sex is an immutable God-given gift,” rather than a “changeable social construct.”  Id. at *10 (internal punctuation omitted).

On July 31, 2013, Ms. Stephens provided Mr. Rost with a letter stating that she had struggled with “a gender identity disorder her entire life” and that she intended to undergo sex reassignment surgery to become a woman.  Id. at *8-9.  In order to have the surgery, Ms. Stephens explained that she first needed to live and work full-time as a woman for at least a year.  Therefore, Ms. Stephens informed Mr. Rost that after an upcoming vacation, she intended to return to work as Aimee Stephens and thereafter dress and present as a woman in the workplace.  Id. at *9.

Mr. Rost responded by firing Ms. Stephens just before she left on vacation.  Id.  Rost admitted during his deposition that he fired Ms. Stephens because “he was no longer to represent himself as a man [and because] [h]e wanted to dress as a woman.”  Id. at *9-10.  Mr. Rost offered Ms. Stephens a severance agreement if she “agreed not to say anything or do anything.”  Id. at *9. Ms. Stephens refused, and filed a sex-discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”).

The EEOC Charge and Determination

In the course of its investigation, the EEOC learned that the Funeral Home imposed a dress code for all “public-facing employees.”  Men were required to wear suits and ties, while women were required to wear skirts and business jackets.  Id. at *7.  The Funeral Home provided it male employees (including Funeral Directors) with free suits and ties and would replace suits as needed, at no cost to the employee.  Id.  The Funeral Home did not, at that time, provide female employees with any sort of clothing or clothing allowance.  Id. at *8.  (Note: the Funeral Home began offering female employees a clothing stipend in October 2014, after the EEOC initiated suit against it).

The EEOC determined that the Funeral Home discharged Ms. Stephens due to her sex and gender identity, in violation of Title VII, and that the Funeral Home further discriminated against female employees by providing a clothing allowance to male employees without a similar benefit to female employees.  The parties were unable to resolve their dispute through the conciliation process, and the EEOC filed suit against the Funeral Home in the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in September 2014.

The District Court’s Ruling in Favor of the Funeral Home

In response to a motion to dismiss by the Funeral Home, the District Court narrowed the scope of the EEOC’s claims.  Specifically, the district court held that the EEOC could not state a claim for discrimination based on Ms. Stephens’s transgender status, because being transgender did not qualify for protection under Title VII.  Id. at *12.  However, the District Court agreed that the EEOC could pursue a claim against the Funeral Home for firing Ms. Stephens based on her failure to conform to the Funeral Home’s “sex-or-gender-based preferences, expectations, or stereotypes.”  Id.

After the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court determined that the Funeral Home had terminated Ms. Stephens based on her sex (and failure to conform to gender stereotypes) in violation of Title VII.  However, the court went on to hold that the EEOC could not enforce Title VII as to the Funeral Home under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, because forcing the Funeral Home to continue to employ Ms. Stephens as a woman would substantially burden Mr. Rost and/or the Funeral Home’s exercise of religious freedom.  Id. at *13.  The Court further held that the EEOC had failed to demonstrate that enforcing Title VII in regards to the Funeral Home was the least restrictive means of achieving the EEOC’s compelling interest in ensuring that Ms. Stephens was not subjected to discrimination based upon her sex/failure to conform to sex stereotypes.  Id.

Sixth Circuit Reverses the District Court

On appeal, the Sixth Circuit held that the district court correctly determined that Ms. Stephens was terminated based upon her failure to conform to sex stereotypes, in violation of Title VII.  Id. at *16.  However, the Court found that the district court erred in holding that Ms. Stephens could not also assert a discrimination claim based upon her transgender status, stating: “Discrimination on the basis of transgender and transitioning status is necessarily discrimination on the basis of sex, and thus the EEOC should have had the opportunity to prove that the Funeral Home violated Title VII by firing Stephens because she is transgender and transitioning from male to female.”  Id.

In discussing the basis for its opinion, the Court expressly rejected the Funeral Home’s argument that its dress code policy did not violate Title VII because the policy imposed the same burden on male and female employees (i.e. because each sex was required to adhere to a certain dress code.)  Id. at *19-20.  The central issue was not, the Court explained, whether the policy imposed a disparate burden on one sex or another.  Rather, “an employer [may engage] in unlawful discrimination even if it expects both biologically male and female employees to conform to certain notions of how each should behave.”  Id. at *24 (internal citations omitted).

Here, Rost admitted that he fired Ms. Stephens because she wished to comply with the Funeral Home’s dress code for women.  The problem arose because Rost viewed Ms. Stephens as a man.  Ms. Stephens would obviously have not been fired if she was a [biologically born] woman trying to comply with the dress code for women; thus, sex was obviously a motivating factor in Ms. Stephens’s termination, which is prohibited by Title VII.  Id. at *27.

In holding that the Funeral Home violated Title VII by firing Ms. Stephens for her transgender status, the Sixth Circuit joined several other Circuit Courts who also held in recent years that Title VII’s prohibition against sex discrimination extended to discrimination based on one’s sexual orientation and transgender status. See e.g., Hively v. Ivy Tech Cmty. Coll. of Ind., 853 F.3d 339, 345 (7th Cir. 2017) (holding that Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and finding in favor of the plaintiff, a self-described lesbian, who was discriminated against for marrying another woman); Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc., ____ F.3d ____, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 4608, *48 (2nd Cir. Feb. 26, 2018) (plurality opinion)  (also holding that Title VII prohibits discrimination based on one’s sexual orientation, because it would be impossible to discriminate against someone based on his or sexual orientation without considering that person’s sex); Glenn v. Brumby, 663 F.3d 1312, 1316-19 (11th Cir. 2011) (holding that terminating an employee because she is transgender violates the prohibition on sex-based discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause following the reasoning of Price Waterhouse);  Rosa v. Park W. Bank & Trust Co., 214 F.3d 213, 215-16 (1st Cir. 2000) (holding that a transgender individual could state a claim for sex discrimination under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act based on Price Waterhouse); and Schwenk v. Hartford, 204 F.3d 1187, 1201-03 (9th Cir. 2000) (holding that a transgender individual could state a claim under the Gender Motivated Violence Act under the reasoning of Price Waterhouse).

In short, although it seems somewhat ground-breaking, EEOC v. R.G. actually reaffirmed long-standing precedent that gender must be completely irrelevant to employment decisions.  Id. at *29 (citing Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 240 (1989)).  See also, Zarda, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 4608 at *43 (“Title VII does not ask whether a particular sex is discriminated against; it asks whether a particular individual is discriminated against because of such individual’s sex”) (emphasis original) (internal punctuation omitted); and Hively, 853 F.3d at 346 n.3 (“The Supreme Court has made it clear that a policy need not affect every woman [or every man] to constitute sex discrimination… A failure to discriminate against all women does not mean that an employer has not discriminated against one woman on the basis of sex.”)  

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act - an excuse for otherwise impermissible sex discrimination?

The R.G. Court next addressed the Funeral Home’s argument that it should not have to comply with Title VII because of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) (which the district court had relied upon to find in the Funeral Home’s favor), and certain amici briefs which urged the Sixth Circuit to hold that the “ministerial exception” rooted in the First Amendment’s religious protections did not require the Funeral Home to employ Ms. Stephens against Rost’s religious objections to her transgender status. The Court rejected both arguments.

First, the Court noted that in order for the ministerial exception to exempt an employer from complying with Title VII’s prohibition against sex discrimination, the employer has to be a religious institution and the employee must be a ministerial employee.  Id. at *41 (citing Conlon v. InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA, 777 F.3d 829, 833 (6th Cir. 2015)).  Here, although the primary owner and operator of the Funeral Home (Rost) was a devout Christian, the Funeral Home itself “has virtually no religious characteristics.”  Id. at *43.  The Funeral Home was not affiliated with any church, its articles of incorporation do not avow any religious purpose, employees are not required to hold any particular religious views, its rooms were not decorated with any religious figures for the purpose of not offending people of different religions, and the Funeral Home is open on Christian holidays (i.e. Easter).  Id. at *43-44.

Similarly, the Court rejected the notion that Ms. Stephens was a “ministerial employee.”  Ms. Stephens’s title – Funeral Director – conveyed a purely secular function, and her job duties also included mostly secular tasks (making contact with the deceased’s family members, coordinating removal of the deceased’s remains to the funeral home, introducing other staff to the family members, coaching the family through the viewing and greeting of guests, and coordinating the “final farewell”).  Id. at *45-46.  This, the Court explained, was a “far cry” from the employee’s duties at issue in Conlon, which included assisting others in building a personal spiritual relationship with God.  Id. at *46 (citing Conlon, 777 F.3d at 832).

Next, the Funeral Home claimed that enforcement of Title VII would violate the RFRA because having to employ a transgender individual would violate Rost’s sincerely held religious beliefs.  By way of background, the RFRA prohibits the government from enforcing a religiously neutral law against an individual if that law substantially burdens the individuals’ religious exercise and is not the least restrictive way to further a compelling government interest.  Here, the Funeral Home argued that having a biologically male employee dress and present as a woman would hinder the Funeral Home’s purpose of assisting grieving family members in the healing process, and/or that it would “pressure Rost to leave the funeral ministry and end his ministry to grieving people.”  Id. at *52-53.  The Sixth Circuit expressly rejected these arguments as well.

The Sixth Circuit noted that the Funeral Home’s first argument – that Ms. Stephens would present a distraction to grieving families – was based on presumed biases. There was no evidence in the record as to how Ms. Stephens would look at a woman in business attire (since Rost admitted that he had never seen Stephens in anything other than traditionally male attire).  And, as a matter of law, the Court held that an employer cannot justify sex discrimination based on customers’ presumed biases (of which there was no actual evidence in the record).  Id. at *54, 57 (“Just as the Fernandez court refused to treat discriminatory promotion practices as critical to an employer’s business, notwithstanding any evidence to that effect in the record, so too we refuse to treat discriminatory policies as essential to Rost’s business – or, by association, his religious exercise.”) (citing Fernandez v. Wynn Oil Co., 653 F.2d 1273, 1276 (9th Cir. 1981)).

Next, the Sixth Circuit rejected the Funeral Home’s argument that employing Stephens as or after she transitioned to female would substantially burden Rost’s exercise of his religion.  The Court explained that “requiring the Funeral Home to refrain from firing an employee with different religious views from Rost does not, as a matter of law, mean that Rost is endorsing or supporting those views. Indeed, Rost’s own behavior suggests that he sees the different between employment and endorsement, as he employs individuals of any or no faith, permits employees to wear Jewish head coverings for Jewish services, and even testified that he is not endorsing his employee’s religious beliefs by employing them.”  Id. at *62 (emphasis original) (internal punctuation omitted).

In short, the Court concluded, “the fact that Rost believes that he is being compelled to make such an endorsement does not make it so.”  Id. at *62-63.  Finally, the Court explained that the EEOC’s enforcement of Title VII’s prohibition against sex discrimination was the least restrictive means of enforcing its compelling government interest and therefore survived strict scrutiny and was an alternative basis upon which to grant summary judgment in favor of the EEOC.  Id. at *63-64.

Best Practices for Employers Following R.G., Zarda, Hively, and Others

Unless and until the United States Supreme Court grants certiorari in one of these cases (or one like it), the law appears to be shifting to a clear recognition that both sexual orientation and being transgender are protected under Title VII’s prohibition against discrimination based upon an employee’s sex.  Employers in Kentucky and elsewhere should take note, along with the following steps to affirm that their employment practices are in line with the current law.

First, an employer should draft and distribute clear employment policies prohibiting discrimination based upon any employee’s sex, including but not limited to, an employee’s sexual orientation and/or status as a transgender employee.  This seems basic, but it is a necessary first step to ensure that all employees are on the same page as to the scope of the employer’s commitment to prevent discrimination based on any employee’s sex.  Also, the reviewing of old policies or the drafting of new policies can serve as a good refresher or training opportunity for managers or supervisory employees who may not have had the benefit of such training (or who received training that is now outdated).

Second, the employer should provide anti-discrimination training to managers and supervisors which clearly states that no employee shall be discriminated against on the basis of his or sex, including but not limited to, sexual orientation and/or transgender status.  Again, this seems basic but, until recently, there was a good faith dispute as to whether employers could in fact discriminate against an employee based upon his or her sexual orientation/transgender status.  In light of R.G. and other similar recent decisions, there no longer appears to be any question that an employer will violate Title VII if it discriminates against an employee on the basis of his or her sexual orientation or transgender status.  Far too often, an employer’s written policies are not clearly communicated to middle-level management staff, who may be the ones directly involved in the discipline and/or termination of other employees.

Next, an employer’s written policies related to sex discrimination should have a clear reporting process, in the event any employee feels he or she has been discriminated against on the basis of sex.  The employer should also have clear written guidelines about how sex discrimination complaints will be investigated and addressed, and managers/supervisors should be well-trained on those steps so that all complaints are investigated and addressed in a uniform manner.  Any complaint that an employee has been treated differently because of his or her sex (regardless of whether the complaint involves sexual harassment, discrimination based on sexual orientation, or discrimination based on being transgender) should be seriously investigated and evaluated so that the employer can address and correct any such discrimination occurring within its workforce.

Finally, it is rare that an employer will be able to justify discrimination based on sex by invoking the RFRA or a “ministerial exception” under the First Amendment.  As the R.G. Court reaffirmed, the ministerial exception is a narrow exception that only applies to religious institutions and employees with ministerial job duties.  Moreover, an employer cannot rely upon the RFRA to justify sex discrimination simply because it disagrees with an employee being transgender and/or their sexual orientation.  Having an employee who is transgender or homosexual does not substantially burden an employer’s right to exercise of religion simply because the employer’s religion teaches that homosexuality and/or being transgender is a sin.  Instead, that is arguably the very purpose of Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination – to protect individual employees in the face of such beliefs, sincerely held they may be.


[1] When this article was written, the time for filing a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court had not yet expired.  Thus, it is unknown whether this decision will become final or be heard further on appeal.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Reminger Co., LPA | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Reminger Co., LPA

Reminger Co., LPA on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at:

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.