Sixth Circuit Paints Vivid Picture Of “Evident Partiality” Sufficient To Vacate Arbitration Award

by Stinson Leonard Street - Arbitration Nation
Contact of the very few ways to show evident partiality by an arbitrator is to show the arbitrator had financial ties to a party or witness in the proceeding, another is to show the arbitrator prejudiced a party by reversing a procedural or evidentiary ruling during the hearing.  The Sixth Circuit found a Michigan arbitrator committed both transgressions, and affirmed the district court’s decision to vacate the resulting arbitration award.  Thomas Kinkade Co. v. White, __ F.3d __, 2013 WL 1296238 (6th Cir. April 2, 2013).

The dispute being arbitrated was between the popular artist Thomas Kinkade and the Whites, who had agreed to be dealers of Kinkade’s artwork.  The Whites started the arbitration in 2002.  There was a panel of three arbitrators to decide the dispute.  Each party chose an arbitrator, and together those arbitrators chose Mark Kowalsky as the third member.  The panel did not issue a “Final Award” until 2009 (and Kinkade’s chosen arbitrator dissented).  The award gave more than $1.4 million to the Whites, including significant attorneys’ fees and costs.

Both the district court and Sixth Circuit found more than enough evidence to establish that “a reasonable person would have to conclude that [Mr. Kowalsky] was partial to one party to the arbitration,” and had “improper motives.”  Based on that conclusion, the courts vacated the arbitration award.  The primary issue was that five years into the arbitration proceedings, after closing arguments in the hearing but before the award, Kowalsky’s law firm took on two significant new matters from the Whites and their appointed arbitrator.  Kowalsky informed the parties of these new financial ties between his firm and the Whites, and Kinkade objected, but the AAA denied Kinkade’s request to disqualify Kowalsky.

A second basis for concluding Kowalsky was partial was the way he handled the Whites’ burden of proving their damages.  During discovery, the Whites had never produced documents about the financial performance of their galleries.  After the hearing was concluded without the Whites offering any proof of damages, instead of ruling against them, Kowalsky gave the Whites two additional opportunities to back up their damage calculations.  On the second occasion, the Whites produced 8,800 new pages of financial records.  Kinkade objected to the new documents, but Kowalsky accepted them into evidence.  Later, after the panel majority’s “Interim Award” indicated that it had denied the Whites’ request for attorneys’ fees, Kowalsky invited the parties to apply for fees and costs, and a majority of the panel added attorneys’ fees, costs, and prejudgment interest to the Whites’ interim award.

While the sheer egregiousness of the arbitrator’s actions is compelling, and the “celebrity” aspect of this case adds good color, what I find most interesting is how the Sixth Circuit analyzes the disclosure issue.  The Whites argued that Kowalsky had disclosed the financial ties between his firm and the other parties and arbitrators (and the AAA refused to disqualify Kowalsky), as if transparency alone made him neutral.  To that argument, the Sixth Circuit notes that “the harm was done” as soon as the disclosure was made, because the disclosure placed Kinkade in a lose-lose situation.  “If [he] object[s], [he] run[s] the risk of offending the neutral; if [he doesn't] object, [he] appear[s] to condone a clear conflict.”  However, other courts have acted as if disclosure alone can right all wrongs, even in the face of similar arguments regarding the lose-lose situation parties are faced with if an arbitrator discloses a significant connection after his her appointment.   (Those courts may assume that disclosure is the solution, because parties will then make an informed choice about objecting and arbitral fora like the AAA will disqualify as appropriate.)  It may be time to analyze parties’ actions in reaction to disclosures made before the arbitrator’s appointment differently than those disclosures made after the arbitrator’s appointment.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stinson Leonard Street - Arbitration Nation | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Stinson Leonard Street - Arbitration Nation

Stinson Leonard Street - Arbitration Nation on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.