Subordination and Recharacterization

Blank Rome LLP
Contact

This practice note discusses how a bankruptcy court may recharacterize documents that purport to create a loan transaction and determine that the transaction, despite labels, is something else—a transaction providing for a contribution to the debtor’s capital. Although lawyers can structure a transaction to look like debt, most appellate courts agree that bankruptcy courts have the authority to determine what a transaction really is despite nomenclature used by the parties to an agreement. A true lender will always want to ensure that a transaction is treated as debt by a bankruptcy court, and therefore must structure the transaction in a way that will reduce their characterization risk. Private equity investors in a project who take back paper at different levels of the capital stack, will have carefully consider the structure of a transaction and determine their tolerance for the recharacterization of the portion of their investment that they have intended to be debt.

Originally published on October 12, 2022, as a LexisNexis Practical Guidance® Practice Note.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Blank Rome LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Blank Rome LLP
Contact
more
less

Blank Rome LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide