Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Return Mail v. U.S. Postal Service

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Earlier today, February 19, 2019, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Return Mail, Inc. v. U.S. Postal Service, which presented the simple question whether the federal government is a "person" entitled to petition for post-grant review under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act ("AIA").  While the issue may rarely arise, it poses a significant threat to the careful balance of the CBM, PGR, and IPR proceedings created by the AIA.

Four basic tenants of federal law -- including patent law -- stand in tension in the Return Mail case.  First, absent an indication to the contrary in a specific statute, the federal government is not a "person."  Second, for almost forty years, the federal government has been considered a "person" entitled to seek post-grant review of patents.  Third, the AIA carefully balanced the availability of AIA post-grant proceedings with a broad estoppel against relitigation of issues that were raised, or could have been raised, in the proceedings in district court or International Trade Commission litigation, but not in the Court of Federal Claims.  And fourth, the federal government is generally not subject to estoppel in the form of issue preclusion.

The starting point for determining who is a person under federal law is the federal Dictionary Act:  "In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, unless the context indicates otherwise . . . the words 'person' and 'whoever' include corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals."[1]  Return Mail argued, supported by Supreme Court precedent, that the Dictionary Act's definition of "person" presumptively excludes government entities.  While it pointed out that the definition is an inclusive list, not an exclusive one that excludes government entities, the Postal Service did not really fight that point.  Rather, it focused on the initial, pre-definition clause and asserted that the Patent Act does indicate otherwise.

The Postal Service's argument relied on the text and structure of the Patent Act, and specifically the AIA, to suggest that the context does indicate that it is a person under the Act.  First, it is uncontested that federal agencies are entitled to obtain patents (as assignees of rights); the language of 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 118, and 119 identify that a "person" is entitled to a patent, may apply for a patent as an assignee, and may claim priority to a foreign application.  Similarly, a "person" may be entitled to intervening rights under § 252 (and other provisions), and government entities have been found to have that right.  As the government noted, "'[I]dentical words used in different parts of the same statute' are generally 'presumed to have the same meaning'" and that presumption is "doubly appropriate" when the various provisions are closely related and enacted at the same time.  Some of the key provisions, including amended § 102 and some of the intervening rights provisions, are part of the AIA and closely related to the post-grant review proceedings.

However, Return Mail pointed out a number of other places in the Patent Act, including the AIA, where the government was not considered to be a "person."  And, indeed, many of the provisions on which the Postal Service relied are more explicit in including government entities as "persons," contrary to the AIA's silence on post-grant proceedings.  Thus, the parties read the Patent Act in completely opposite ways, with the Postal Service saying that it established an exception to the Dictionary Act and Return Mail saying that it did not.

The Postal Service therefore looked at the history of federal agencies' participation in the patent system, and most importantly post-grant proceedings.  Unquestionably, federal agencies have been permitted to participate as "persons" in pre-AIA post-grant proceedings.  Specifically, since 1980, federal agencies have repeatedly been involved in ex parte reexamination and inter partes reexamination.  The latter proceedings are especially relevant, since "any person" is allowed to petition and the proceedings gave rise to an estoppel.  Specifically, a requester in inter partes reexamination was estopped from asserting in a civil action the "invalidity of any claim finally determined to be valid and patentable on any ground which the third-party requester raised or could have raised during the inter partes reexamination proceedings."[2]

However, while both inter partes reexamination and AIA post-grant proceedings call for estoppels, the scope of estoppel for AIA post-grant proceedings is importantly different.  In both the earlier and current proceedings, estoppel is an important quid pro quo for the right to participate in the proceedings.  But for inter partes reexamination, the estoppel would arguably apply to government agencies.  Today, under the AIA, the estoppel applies only in district courts and the ITC:

The petitioner in an inter partes review of a claim in a patent under this chapter that results in a final written decision under section 318(a), or the real party in interest or privy of the petitioner, may not assert either in a civil action arising in whole or in part under section 1338 of title 28 or in a proceeding before the International Trade Commission under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 that the claim is invalid on any ground that the petitioner raised or reasonably could have raised during that inter partes review. [3]

That is, the estoppel clearly would not apply in actions brought in the Court of Federal Claims.  Thus, there is no quid pro quo for government agencies, but that constituted a change from the previous statute.  Return Mail argued that indicates that there was no intent to allow government agencies to participate in post-grant proceedings; the Postal Service argued that it indicated a reasoned decision by Congress, having considered prior statutes, to allow government agencies to have the benefit of participating in such proceedings without the concomitant burden of any estoppel.  And while there are almost four decades of practice that would support allowing the government to participate in such proceedings, the Supreme Court has made it clear that it will show no deference to longstanding Federal Circuit practices that it determines to be incorrect under the law.[4]

The question of statutory estoppel is heightened because, unlike a private litigant, the government is generally not subject to estoppel.  Of course, it is subject to collateral estoppel, but that relates only to issues actually litigated and determined in a prior proceeding.  The statutory estoppel of AIA § 315 also applies to issues that could have been raised, but were not.  Thus, government entities would be at a substantial advantage in avoiding statutory estoppel under the AIA.

The Justices, however, chose to focus their attention (and questions) elsewhere.

Several of the Justices, including Justices Ginsburg[5] and Breyer, were clearly bothered by the fact that government entities were entitled to participate in ex parte proceedings (including ex parte reexamination and third party submissions of art)[6], but would not be entitled to participate in "more efficient" inter partes proceedings.  They questioned how a government department could be a "person" in ex parte proceedings but not in inter partes proceedings.  That ex parte proceedings were in place long before the AIA, and have some textual support for considering a governmental entity to be a "person," seemed less of an issue than the incongruity of allowing government entities to participate in one type of proceeding and not the other.

On the other hand, several of the Justices -- most clearly Justice Kavanaugh -- questioned the government's position based on the premise that the executive branch is presumed, and entitled, to speak with one voice.  It is one thing for one agency (such as the Postal Service) to turn back to the Patent and Trademark Office as the subject matter expert in patentability to correct an error in post-grant proceedings.  It is quite another for that same agency, dissatisfied with the outcome of those post-grant proceedings, to be able to then go to the Court of Federal Claims and assert a defense that its sister agency erred in the post-grant proceedings.  That is, the Postal Service's argument seems to conflict with the fundamental structural presumptions of the executive branch.  And it certainly did not help that the government was unable to point to a clear textual basis for understanding that it was entitled to be a "person" for purposes of the AIA post-grant proceedings, and instead resorted to policy arguments to seek to turn the presumption that the government generally is not considered a "person" on its head.

Also notably, both parties gave little attention to a rule of construction that the Federal Circuit rested its opinion heavily upon:  that the statute should be construed to allow a government entity to be a "person" if it would be benefited by such a reading, but not if the reading would be detrimental.  The government mentioned the argument, but spent little time and faced no question on the issue.  Rather, the government sought to stress more strongly that it could be a participant in post-grant proceedings as a patentee, but not as a challenger (at least, if Return Mail prevails).  It was that unfairness that the government sought to highlight rather than the Federal Circuit's rule of thumb.

One last point raised during the government's argument made it clear, however, that the stakes of the case are relatively low.  The government was asked about how frequently the issue before the Court arises.  Since the enactment of the AIA in 2011, the government has brought only 20 post-grant proceedings.  Thus, while there is significant academic question about the case, there is little direct practical effect to the Court's decision, regardless of how it rules.

[1] 1 U.S.C. § 1.
[2] Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 315(c).  The statute provided:

A third-party requester whose request for an inter partes reexamination results in an order under section 313 is estopped from asserting at a later time, in any civil action arising in whole or in part under section 1338 of title 28, the invalidity of any claim finally determined to be valid and patentable on any ground which the third-party requester raised or could have raised during the inter partes reexamination proceedings.  This subsection does not prevent the assertion of invalidity based on newly discovered prior art unavailable to the third-party requester and the Patent and Trademark Office at the time of the inter partes reexamination proceedings.

The Postal Service argues that provision is broader than current § 315.
[3] 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2).
[4] See TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, 137 S. Ct. 1514 (2017).
[5] Justice Ginsburg asked the first question in her return to the bench after several weeks away for cancer treatment.
[6] The Justices also asked about a government entity calling the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office, seeking sua sponte reexamination of patents, as a means of post-grant review.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at:

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.