Supreme Judicial Court: Short-Term Rentals Not Consistent with Single-Family Residential Zoning

Robinson & Cole LLP

In a ruling that could affect short-term rental owners and municipalities across Massachusetts, the Supreme Judicial Court (Court) held in Styller v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Lynnfield, (June 7, 2021) that short-term rentals were not a permissible use under the town of Lynnfield’s zoning bylaw prior to its amendment in 2016. The Court rejected the argument that short-term rentals were a permissible primary use as a “one-family detached house,” calling it “fundamentally flawed” for failing to “recognize that the short-term rental use of a home is inconsistent with the zoning purpose of the single-residence zoning district in which it is situated, i.e., to preserve the residential character of the neighborhood.”

Please see full Publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robinson & Cole LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Robinson & Cole LLP

Robinson & Cole LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.