Target Files Motion to Dismiss Data Breach Lawsuit

by Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP

By now, we all know about the massive data breach at national retailer Target over the 2013 holiday season.  The cyber-attack was carried out by sophisticated criminal hackers, who allegedly gained access to Target’s network through credentials they stole from a third-party vendor whom Target retained for HVAC maintenance.  Once inside the Target network, the hackers deployed custom point-of-sale malware to Target’s registers, which collected credit and debit card information “in real time” when customers swiped their cards at Target registers between December 2, 2013 and December 15, 2013.

Target faces several class-action lawsuits from banks and consumers arising out of the data breach that were consolidated in the retailer’s home state Minnesota, before the U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson.  Last week, on September 2, 2014, Target filed a motion to dismiss  the claims of a group of five payment-card-issuing banks, credit unions, and savings associations (“Banks”) that seek damages that include costs associated with reissuing payment cards to customers and reimbursing fraudulent charges.


In their Complaint, the Banks assert counts for negligence and negligent misrepresentation by omission, as well as for violation of the Minnesota Plastic Card Security Act (the “PCSA”) and negligence per se based on the PCSA.  Target’s motion contends that the Banks’ Complaint fails to state a claim under each of the theories alleged.

According to Target’s application, card issuers like the Banks participate in an “extensive network of financial institutions” that together process retail payment card transactions.  This process begins with a financial institution, like the Banks, issuing a payment card to a consumer.  The consumer then may choose to use that payment card to make purchases at retail merchants, such as Target. When this occurs, the merchant obtains authorization and payment for the transactions not from the bank that issued the card (the “issuing bank”), but rather from a payment processor and/or a merchant bank (an “acquiring bank”) that has contracted with the merchant to handle the transaction.

The acquiring bank in turn obtains authorization and payment under its separate contract with a payment card company such as Visa and MasterCard (the “Card Brands”), and the Card Brand in turn obtains authorization and funding under its separate contract with the issuing bank.  Thus, issuing banks and merchants have no direct dealings with one another in the payment card transaction process.

Target contends that the Banks’ negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims turn on there being a never-before recognized “special relationship” between merchants, like Target, and payment card issuers, like the Banks, that justifies creation and imposition of a “new” common-law duty of care. The motion argues that the Banks are sophisticated parties that do not even have a direct relationship with Target, much less a special relationship that might suffice to create such a duty in either the negligence or negligent misrepresentation context. In simpler terms, Target argues that the Banks’ negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims all boil down to the contention that a merchant has a common-law duty to take certain steps to protect issuing banks from financial losses caused by third-party criminal attacks aimed at stealing payment card data, which is not recognized by Minnesota law.

Target goes on to argue that the facts alleged do not justify the imposition of “new” and “unprecedented” common-law tort duties under Minnesota law as (1) the Minnesota Legislature already has addressed the issue of when a merchant might be liable to an issuer following a data breach; (2) the contractual regime upon which the Banks base many of their claims already provides a system under which issuers may be compensated following a data breach; and (3) courts in other jurisdictions already have refused to impose common-law tort duties based on similar allegations.

Further, according to Target, even if that were not the case, the Banks’ failure to plead other elements of their claims, such as breach, an actionable misrepresentation by omission, or reliance, nevertheless require dismissal. With respect to the Banks’ PCSA and an accompanying negligence per se claim, the motion argues that the Banks’ own allegations confirm that the breach involved theft of payment card data “in real time” which is outside the scope of a PCSA violation.

It will be interesting to see if the District Court addresses head-on the issue of whether a merchant or retailer such as Target has a common-law duty to take certain steps to protect issuing banks from financial losses caused by third-party criminal attacks aimed at stealing payment card data, and if so, the scope of that duty. Further, a ruling on the motion to dismiss has the potential to address the application and scope of the PCSA with respect to a financial institutions’ ability to sue organizations that expose payment card data due to a security breach. As such, the District Court’s handling of Target’s motion to dismiss will be closely watched to see whether and how the Court’s ruling affects the rights and potential liabilities of merchants and payment-card-issuing institutions going forward.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.