Testing Texas CGL Coverage For 3rd Party Products

by Zelle LLP
Contact

Texas Law360 - October 22, 2014

On Sept. 19, the Fifth Circuit certified four questions to the Texas Supreme Court regarding coverage under a commercial general liability policy in U.S. Metals Incorporated v. Liberty Mutual Group Incorporated, No. 13-20433, 2014 WL 4652892 (5th Cir. Sept. 19, 2014). The questions specifically address the meaning of the terms “physical injury” and “replacement” in two exclusions, the “Your Product” exclusion and “Impaired Property” exclusion, commonly found in CGL policies. The case specifically examines whether damage caused when an insured’s defective product is installed and then removed from a third-party’s property is covered under the insured’s CGL policy.

In U.S. Metals, Exxon Mobil Corp. and U.S. Metals entered an agreement whereby U.S. Metals would manufacture and sell to Exxon 350 standard, weld neck flanges for installation in Exxon’s refineries. The flanges were irreversibly incorporated into the facilities by welding and bolting the flanges onto pipes. About a year after installation, Exxon discovered a leak in one of the flanges. Exxon’s subsequent investigation revealed that U.S. Metals had subcontracted out the manufacturing of the flanges to Maass Flanges Corp. and that they had been improperly manufactured.

Exxon argued that the only way to mitigate its damages was to order new flanges from a different manufacturer and replace all the flanges supplied by U.S. Metals. The replacement required stripping the temperature coating, removing and damaging the bolts and gaskets, and grinding down millimeters of the pipes to which the flanges were attached. The replacement also required portions of the refineries to be shut down for several weeks.

Exxon brought suit against U.S. Metals seeking damages for the costs associated with investigating the flange defect, replacing the defective flanges and the resulting loss of use of Exxon’s property. U.S. Metals requested that its CGL carrier, Liberty Mutual, defend and indemnify U.S. Metals in the lawsuit filed by Exxon.

Liberty Mutual denied the request based on two exclusions. First, the “Your Product” exclusion bars coverage for “‘property damage’ to ‘your product’ arising out of it or any part of it.” The policy defined property damage as “physical injury to tangible property, including all resulting loss of use of that property.”

Second, Liberty Mutual relied on the “Impaired Property” exclusion which bars coverage for:

“Property damage” to “impaired property” or property that has not been physical impaired, arising out of:

(1) A defect, deficiency, inadequacy, or dangerous conditions in “your product” or “your work”; or 

(2) A delay or failure by you or anyone acting on your behalf to perform a contract or agreement in accordance with its terms.

“Impaired property” was defined as:

Tangible property, other than “your product” or “your work,” that cannot be used or is less useful because[:]

(1) it incorporates “your product” or “your work” that is known or thought to be defective, deficient, inadequate or dangerous; or 

(2) you have failed to fulfill the terms of a contract or agreement 

if such property can be restored to use by the repair, replacement, adjustment, or removal of “Your Product” or “your work” or your fulfilling the terms of the contract or agreement.

U.S. Metals sued Liberty Mutual alleging the insurer breached its duty to defend and indemnify. Liberty Mutual filed for summary judgment on the exclusions above, which a district court granted it. U.S. Metals appealed to the Fifth Circuit.

In its appeal, U.S. Metals first argued that the Impaired Property exclusion didn’t apply for two reasons. First, U.S. Metals argued that Exxon’s property to which the defective flanges were attached was not “property that has not been physical[ly] impaired,” as referenced in the exclusion, because the attachment of the defective flanges to the property caused physical damage to Exxon’s property. Additionally, U.S. Metals argued that Exxon’s property was not “impaired property,” because Exxon’s property could not be restored simply by the replacement of the defective flanges; such replacement caused additional damage not directly related to the defective flanges. Accordingly, U.S. Metals argued the Impaired Property exclusion did not bar coverage.

With regard to the “Your Product” exclusion, U.S. Metals argued that it did not bar coverage for the costs claimed, because the property at issue was not the defective flanges, but the other components damaged by the installation or removal of the flanges.

Deciding the Texas Supreme Court had never analyzed the terms “physical injury” and “replacement” in the Your Product and Impaired Property exclusions, the Fifth Circuit certified the following questions to the state high court:

  1. In the “your product” and “impaired property” exclusions, are the terms “physical     injury” and/or “replacement” ambiguous?
  2. If yes as to either, are the aforementioned interpretations offered by the insured     reasonable and thus, must be applied pursuant to Texas law?
  3. If the above question one is answered in the negative as to “physical injury,” does physical injury occur to the third party’s product that is irreversibly attached to the insured’s product at the moment of incorporation of the insured’s defective product, or does “physical injury” only occur to the third party’s product when there is an alteration in the color, shape or appearance of the third party’s product due to the insured’s defective product that is irreversibly attached?
  4. If the above question one is answered in the negative as to “replacement,” does replacement of the insured’s defective product irreversibly attached to a third party’s product include the removal or destruction of the third party’s product?

On Sept. 26, 2014, the Texas Supreme Court accepted certification and requested briefing from the parties on the issues.

Perhaps the most significant issue to be decided by the Texas Supreme Court in answering these questions is whether the incorporation of a defective product into other property constitutes “physical injury” to other component parts of the property. In 2006, the Texas Court of Appeals in Houston held that mere incorporation of a defective product into covered property is not “damage.” Lennar Corp. v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 200 S.W.3d 651 (Tex. App. – Houston [14th Dist.] 2006), abrogated on other grounds by 327 S.W.3d 118. However, Lennar did not address the question of damage to component parts and/or whether “damage” means the same thing as “physical injury.”

Since Lennar, Texas practitioners have generally understood the Texas rule to be that mere incorporation of a defective product into insured property is not itself “damage.” In the coming months, the Texas Supreme Court will have an opportunity to fully examine this issue for the first time. 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Zelle LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Zelle  LLP
Contact
more
less

Zelle LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.