Texas High Court Formally Adopts Sham Affidavit Rule in Summary Judgment Setting

by Winstead PC

Winstead PC

Current headlines are dominated with accusations of “fake news” and we have been introduced to the unsettling concept of “alternative facts.”  In this hyper-politicized climate, will the judicial system serve as the last bastion of a bygone era where facts are definite, lawyers serve as officers of the court and the truth matters?  Perhaps so.  A recent Texas Supreme Court case dealt with the importance of truth in the civil justice system when the Court addressed the issue of “sham affidavits” in summary judgment proceedings.  In Lujan v. Navistar, Inc., the Court rejected a party’s attempt to present an affidavit that was clearly untruthful and viewed as a sham.

The facts of Lujan involved a $3 Million breach of warranty case, which presented conflicting testimony about the ownership of several allegedly defective commercial vehicles.  In the case, the Texas Supreme Court formally adopted the sham affidavit rule in summary judgment settings.[1]  The Court sustained a grant of summary judgment and dismissal of the plaintiff’s claims and held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in disregarding contradicting testimony the plaintiff had offered in an affidavit regarding the ownership of the allegedly defective vehicles.  The Court disregarded this testimony and deemed it a sham affidavit, because the plaintiff’s deposition testimony contradicted his affidavit on material points involving corporate activities, the plaintiff’s attempt to explain away the inconsistency was insufficient, and the plaintiff’s attorney openly admitted that the affidavit was false.[2]

Before Lujan, the sham affidavit rule has long been applied throughout the federal court system under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which contains language nearly identical to Rule 166a of the Texas Rules. Further, as discussed below, a majority of Texas intermediate appellate courts have recognized the sham affidavit rule as well within a trial court’s authority under Rule 166a to grant summary judgment when no genuine issue as to any material fact exists. This article discusses the following topics related to the sham affidavit rule:

  • What is the Sham Affidavit Rule;
  • Texas Courts Historical Application of the Sham Affidavit Rule; and
  • Considerations Concerning the Application of the Sham Affidavit Rule.

What is the Sham Affidavit Rule

Under the sham affidavit rule, if a party submits an affidavit that conflicts with the affiant’s prior sworn testimony and does not provide a sufficient explanation for the factual conflict, the trial court may disregard the affidavit.  Specifically, the trial court does not have to consider any of the statements in a sham affidavit when deciding whether the party has raised a genuine issue of material fact that would be sufficient to avoid summary judgment.[3]

Texas Courts Historical Application of the Sham Affidavit Rule

In 1962, the Texas Supreme Court first addressed the argument that an affidavit should be disregarded in the summary judgment context because it conflicted with deposition testimony in Gaines v. Hamman.[4]  In Gaines, the plaintiff sued the defendant claiming an interest in an oil and gas lease.[5] Early in the case, the plaintiff testified at his deposition there was no express agreement or contract between him and the defendant regarding the ownership of the interests.[6] After the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment based upon the plaintiff's deposition testimony, the plaintiff filed a detailed affidavit setting forth the alleged terms of an agreement on which his claims were based.[7]  The defendant argued that where an inconsistency exists between the deposition testimony and an affidavit, the deposition testimony should control.[8] The Texas Supreme Court disagreed, and held that a fact issue existed:

While admissions on file may be likened to pleadings and considered as written judicial admissions, there is no basis for giving controlling effect to a deposition as compared to an affidavit. Neither does the fact that the deposition is more detailed in some respects than the affidavit vest it with dominant authority. . . . If conflicting inferences may be drawn from the deposition and from the affidavit of the same party, a fact issue is presented. It is not the purpose of the summary judgment rule to provide either a trial by deposition or a trial by affidavit, but rather to provide a method of summarily terminating a case when it clearly appears that only a question of law is involved and that there is no genuine issue of fact.[9]

The court thus held that the conflicting statements submitted in the affidavit by the party opposing summary judgment created a fact issue and reversed the decision.[10]

More than 25 years later, the Texas Supreme Court next addressed the issue in 1988 in Randall v. Dallas Power & Light Co.[11]  In Randall, the plaintiff in an automobile accident case attested in an affidavit that the defendant's claims agent had made generous promises to him about future damages and compensation.[12]  The defendant moved for summary judgment, but the trial court denied that motion.[13]  Thereafter, the defendant took plaintiff's deposition, in which he testified that “he could not remember any representations being made by the claims agent regarding future damages or expenses.”[14]  The trial court granted the summary judgment, and the appeals court affirmed.[15]

In a per curiam opinion, the Texas Supreme Court reversed, reaffirming its holding in Gaines:

[A] deposition does not have controlling effect over an affidavit in determining whether a motion for summary judgment should be granted. Thus, if conflicting inferences may be drawn from a deposition and from an affidavit filed by the same party in opposition to a motion for summary judgment, a fact issue is presented. In this instance, conflicting inferences can definitely be drawn from the deposition and affidavit testimony.  In the affidavit, Randall testified that Moore [the claims agent] made definite representations to him regarding future damages, whereas, in the deposition, he stated that he did not remember any representations pertaining to future damages.[16]

Because the defendant had not met “[its] burden of showing that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact,” the Supreme Court held that the summary judgment had been improperly granted.[17]

Following these Texas Supreme Court cases in Gaines and Randall, the law in Texas seemed well-settled through the mid-1990s; if a party's summary judgment affidavit conflicted directly with its deposition testimony, a fact issue existed.  These cases precluded a trial court from disregarding a party's affidavit statements in deciding whether a fact issues existed that would bar summary judgment, even where those statements were directly contradicted by the party's own previous deposition testimony.[18]  In the mid-1990s, however, this settled precedent—that a fact issue exists where a party's affidavit and deposition testimony conflict—was upended by a court of appeals decision adopting a new sham affidavit theory. The first Texas court to raise the sham affidavit concern was the First Court of Appeals in Houston in Farroux v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc., 962 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. App. - Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, no pet.).

Since then, several other Texas appellate courts either expressly or impliedly adopted the sham affidavit rule.[19]  Meanwhile, other appellate courts continued to cite Gaines and Randall, and declined to recognize the sham affidavit rule.[20]  Thus, before the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Lujan v. Navistar, a split of authority existed among the intermediate courts of appeals in Texas regarding contradictory summary judgment evidence.

Considerations Concerning the Texas Supreme Court’s Adoption of Sham Affidavit Rule

In Lujan, the Texas Supreme Court resolved the split among Texas appellate courts and adopted the majority view in holding that “if a party submits an affidavit that conflicts with the affiant's prior sworn testimony and does not provide a sufficient explanation for the conflict, a trial court may disregard the affidavit when deciding whether the party has raised a genuine fact issue to avoid summary judgment.”[21]  The Supreme Court emphasized that the sham affidavit rule does not contravene the long-standing principle that the trial court is “not to weigh the evidence or determine its credibility, and thus try the case on the affidavits.”[22]  Rather, the Court held that the sham affidavit rule is a tool that may be used to distinguish genuine fact issues from non-genuine fact issues in service of the “underlying purpose of Rule 166a [to] eliminat[e] . . . patently unmeritorious claims or untenable defenses . . . .”[23]

Prior to the Court’s opinion in Lujan, appellate courts disagreed about the effect of a sham affidavit, and specifically, whether sham affidavits must be disregarded as a matter of law.[24]  In Lujan, the Supreme Court clarified that the sham affidavit rule does not authorize trial courts to strike every affidavit that contradicts the affiant's prior sworn testimony.[25]  Instead, the Court reasoned that “[t]o allow every failure of memory or variation in a witness's testimony to be disregarded as a sham would require far too much from lay witnesses . . . .”[26]   Sometimes, the Court noted, a contradictory affidavit is warranted, but an explanation for the contradiction is also warranted.[27]  As an example of this limitation, the Court explained that courts have acknowledged that newly discovered evidence may justify a contradictory affidavit,[28] and other times, an affiant “may have been confused about what was being asked” during a deposition and therefore an affidavit, though facially inconsistent, should be considered.[29]

Further, the Court adopted the Fifth Circuit’s application of the sham affidavit rule to all prior sworn testimony, not only deposition testimony.[30] Finally, the Court noted that a trial court’s application of the sham affidavit rule in disregarding an affidavit as a sham will be reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.


The key takeaways from the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Lujan v. Navistar are: (1) the sham affidavit rule applies to all cases pending in Texas state courts; (2) the sham affidavit rule does not authorize trial courts to strike every affidavit that contradicts the affiant’s prior sworn testimony; (3) the sham affidavit rule applies to all prior, inconsistent sworn testimony (not just depositions or testimony in a given case); and (4) the application of the sham affidavit rule by trial courts in disregarding the statements set forth in contradictory affidavits will be reviewed on appeal under the abuse of discretion standard.    

A final takeaway is that, in many if not most cases, there is only one clear version of the truth.  As a result, the first time a party is asked to state facts on the record, the party needs be accurate and truthful or risk forfeiting any future opportunity to tell a different story that conflicts with this truthful rendition of the facts. 

[1] See Lujan v. Navistar, Inc., No. 16-0588, 2018 Tex. LEXIS 347 (Apr. 27, 2018).

[2] The Texas Supreme Court noted, however, that the conflict between the plaintiff’s affidavit and his attorney’s statements did not alone dictate the outcome of the case because the sham affidavit rule looks to contradictions in sworn testimony, not in attorney statements. The Court reasoned that other circumstances supporting the trial court's decision to disregard the plaintiff’s affidavit as a sham were present. These circumstances include the admitted falsity of the affidavit and the inconsistent statements of the plaintiff’s attorney, both of which buttress the trial court's conclusion that the late-filed and contradictory affidavit did not raise genuine fact issues sufficient to survive summary judgment. Id. at *26-27.

[3] Id. at *1.

[4] David F. Johnson, The Competency of the Sham Affidavit as Summary Judgment Proof in Texas, 40 St. Mary's L. J. 205, 218 (2008) (citing Gaines v. Hamman, 358 S.W.2d 557, 561 (1962)).

[5] Id. (citing Gaines, 358 S.W.2d at 558).

[6] Id. (citing Gaines, 358 S.W.2d at 561-62).

[7] Id. (citing Gaines, 358 S.W.2d at 558-59).

[8] Id. (citing Gaines, 358 S.W.2d at 561).

[9] Id. (citing Gaines, 358 S.W.2d at 562-63 (omitting citations)).

[10] Id. (citing Gaines, 358 S.W.2d at 563).

[11] Id. at *220 (citing Randall v. Dallas Power & Light Co., 752 S.W.2d 4 (Tex. 1988) (per curiam)).

[12] Id. (citing Randall, 752 S.W.2d at 4-5).

[13] Id. (citing Randall, 752 S.W.2d at 5).

[14] Id.

[15] Id.

[16] Id. (citing Randall, 752 S.W.2d at 5 (omitting citations)).

[17] Id.

[18] Id. at *223.

[19] Eight intermediate Texas courts of appeals have recognized the sham affidavit rule. See Fred Loya Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Cohen, 446 S.W.3d 913, 927 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2014, pet. denied); Pando v. Sw. Convenience Stores, LLC, 242 S.W.3d 76, 79 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2007, no pet.); Trostle v. Trostle, 77 S.W.3d 908, 915 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, no pet.); Eslon Thermoplastics v. Dynamic Sys., Inc., 49 S.W.3d 891, 901 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, no pet.); Burkett v. Welborn, 42 S.W.3d 282, 286 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2001, no pet.); Cantu v. Peacher, 53 S.W.3d 5, 10-11 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001, pet. denied); Farroux v. Denny's Rests., Inc., 962 S.W.2d 108, 111 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, no pet.); Lujan v. Navistar, Inc., 503 S.W.3d 424, 439 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, pet. granted). 

[20] Four intermediate Texas courts of appeals have not recognized the sham affidavit rule. See Pierce v. Wash. Mut. Bank, 226 S.W.3d 711, 717-18 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2007, pet. denied); Del Mar Coll. Dist. v. Vela, 218 S.W.3d 856, 862 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2007, no pet.); Davis v. City of Grapevine, 188 S.W.3d 748, 756 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied); Thompson v. City of Corsicana Housing Auth., 57 S.W.3d 547, 557 (Tex. App.—Waco 2001, no pet.).

[21] See Lujan, No. 16-0588, 2018 Tex. LEXIS 347, at * 1.

[22] Id. at *15 (citing Gulbenkian v. Penn, 252 S.W.2d 929, 931 (Tex. 1952)).

[23] Id.

[24] Cf. Burkett v. Welborn, 42 S.W.3d 282, 286 (Tex. App. - Texarkana 2001, no pet.) (holding contradictory affidavit must be disregarded); Cantu v. Peacher, 53 S.W.3d 5, 7 (Tex. App. - San Antonio 2001, pet. denied) (holding contradictory affidavit must be disregarded); Thompson v. City of Corsicana Hous. Auth., 57 S.W.3d 547, 557 (Tex. App. - Waco 2001, no pet.) (explaining summary judgment cannot be granted based upon plaintiff's credibility as evidenced by a sham affidavit because it is an issue of fact for the trier of fact); Davis v. City of Grapevine, 188 S.W.3d 748, 755 (Tex. App. - Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied) (holding that “[A] deposition does not have controlling effect over an affidavit in determining whether a motion for summary judgment should be granted. Thus, when a deposition and an affidavit filed by the same party in opposition to a motion for summary judgment conflict, a fact issue is presented that will preclude summary judgment.”).

[25] Lujan, No. 16-0588, 2018 Tex. LEXIS 347, at * 10.

[26] Id. (citing Tippens v. Celotex Corp., 805 F.2d 949, 953 (11th Cir. 1986)).

[27] Id.

[28] Id. (citing Franks v. Nimmo, 796 F.2d 1230, 1237 (10th Cir. 1986)).

[29] Id. (citing Pyramid Sec. Ltd. v. IB Resolution, Inc., 924 F.2d 1114, 1123, 288 U.S. App. D.C. 157 (D.C. Cir. 1991)).

[30] See  Copeland v. Wasserstein, Perella & Co., 278 F.3d 472, 482 (5th Cir. 2002) (applying the sham affidavit rule to prior sworn testimony other than deposition testimony); see also Lujan, No. 16-0588, 2018 Tex. LEXIS 347, at * 1.

Written by:

Winstead PC

Winstead PC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.