In R v Barton & Booth, a five member Court of Criminal Appeal: 1) emphatically endorsed the Ivey test for dishonesty, firmly dismissing the previous two-stage test in Ghosh; 2) affirmed that, in relation to conspiracy to defraud, there needed to be no requirement of an “aggravating feature” over and above a dishonest agreement which includes some unlawfulness in its object or means; and 3) rejected the suggestion that conspiracy to defraud, when properly particularised, falls foul of Article 7 of the ECHR.
We examine some of the implications of the decision, particularly in relation to corporate fraud and the effect on companies, small and large, including financial institutions.
Please see full publication below for more information.