The Defendant-Friendly Confines of Federal Court in Indiana Premises Liability Cases

by Reminger Co., LPA
Contact

Being in federal court, rather than Indiana state court, can be advantageous for a defendant seeking summary judgment, especially in a premises liability case.  Many state court judges do not want to take a case away from a jury, and they can, and often do, deny summary judgment based on even the slightest question of fact.  Indiana’s summary judgment standard and related case law make summary judgment in negligence cases very difficult to obtain.  But in federal court, a far more defendant friendly standard renders summary judgment significantly more likely by shifting the burden to the plaintiff to prove his claim to survive the dispositive motion, rather than requiring the defendant to disprove the plaintiff’s claim.

This difference in standard was recently addressed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.  On March 23, 2018, that court issued its opinion in Austin v. Walgreen Company, affirming an Indiana district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Walgreens in a slip and fall action brought by its customer, Robin Austin.  The court found Austin had not offered sufficient evidence to establish Walgreens knew of the presence of the water on which she alleges she fell.  Therefore, Austin did not establish that Walgreens owed her any duty, a necessary element of her negligence claim. 

The Austin decision is noteworthy for its discussion of the distinction between the Indiana and federal summary judgment standard.  Had the case been in Indiana state court, Austin would almost certainly have survived Walgreens' motion, but she could not do so under the more stringent federal standard.  

Austin had arrived at a Walgreens store in Hebron, Indiana on a cold day in January, just as a snow plow was leaving Walgreens' parking lot.  After perusing the store, she slipped and fell while walking toward the cash registers.  She denied seeing anything on the floor that caused her fall, but she testified she felt her “right foot hit something wet”.  She assumed she slipped on water on the floor.  Several minutes later, Austin’s friend came to the store and photographed “puddles of water.”  The friend later testified she saw “water everywhere”.  Paramedics took Austin to the hospital, where she was diagnosed with a broken left knee cap.  Walgreens' assistant store manager denied knowing of any water on the floor prior to Austin falling.

Austin sued Walgreens for negligence in Indiana state court.  Walgreens removed the action to federal court based on diversity of citizenship.  Walgreens moved for summary judgment wherein it argued it owed Austin no duty, as it had no knowledge of the water on which she alleged she slipped and fell.  It was undisputed Austin was a business invitee of Walgreens.  Under Indiana law, in order to be liable for injury to its invitee, the premises owner must have had actual or constructive knowledge of the condition that caused the injury.  The court needed not determine whether Austin did in fact slip on water; it needed only to assess whether Walgreens knew or should have known of the presence of such water if it had, in fact, been present.

As there was no evidence of Walgreens' actual knowledge of any water on the floor, the court considered whether Walgreens had constructive knowledge of the water, i.e. whether it should have known of the water’s presence.  Under Indiana law, to establish constructive knowledge, a plaintiff must show a condition has existed for such a length of time and under such circumstances that it would have been discovered in sufficient time to prevent the plaintiff’s injury had the premises owner, its agents, and its employees used ordinary care. 

In response to Walgreens' motion, Austin pointed to her own testimony that she “stepped on something wet” and to her friend’s testimony and photographs as evidence of the presence of water on the floor prior to her fall.  However, the court found such evidence did not establish the time such water had been present.  Austin also offered Walgreens' assistant manager’s admission that sometimes customers tracked snow in from outside, leaving water on the store’s floor.  The court found that such evidence established only that Walgreens knew hazards were possible, not that it knew of the existence of the specific hazard that allegedly injured Austin.  The court found that “[w]ithout evidence that Walgreens had a chance to respond to a hazard, Austin cannot establish knowledge.  Austin relies on nothing but speculation to suggest that the alleged hazard existed for any significant length of time before her fall.  Speculation does not defeat summary judgment.” 

In affirming the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Walgreens, the court noted that its decision conflicted with two Indiana Court of Appeals decisions cited by Austin, wherein those two plaintiffs survived the defendants’ motions for summary judgment.  But the court acknowledged that those plaintiffs survived summary “due to a distinctive feature of Indiana summary judgment procedure, and so are inapposite here.”  The Walgreens court explained “[i]n Indiana, a defendant must affirmatively disprove an element of the plaintiff’s case.  In this respect, Indiana’s summary judgment procedure abruptly diverges from federal summary judgment practice.  In federal court, a party moving for summary judgment does not need to present any evidence concerning the non-movant’s claim.  All a federal movant has to do is point to the absence of evidence to support the claim.”

While certain factors must exist before removal of a case to federal court is possible, property owners sued in Indiana for premises liability should strongly consider removing the case given the far more defendant-friendly summary judgment standard.  In recent months, we are seeing a significant number of federal court entries of summary judgment in favor of property owners in premises liability cases.  We expect the Austin decision will embolden federal district courts in Indiana to continue to grant summary judgment in favor of defendant premises owners.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Reminger Co., LPA | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Reminger Co., LPA
Contact
more
less

Reminger Co., LPA on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.