The NCUA's New Member Business Lending and Commercial Lending Rule, and the Lingering Issue of Spousal Guarantees

by Nexsen Pruet, PLLC
Contact

Nexsen Pruet, PLLC

Business loans have “become a larger share of credit unions’ loans and assets.”[1]  Of those credit unions with between $100 million and $500 million in assets, over three quarters are making business loans.  Of those with more than $500 million in assets, over 90% are making business loans.[2]

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) recently updated its Member Business Lending and Commercial Lending rule to provide greater flexibility to credit unions in making Member Business Loans and commercial loans (yes, there’s a distinction).

In February 2016, the “NCUA Board unanimously approved a final member business lending rule that [amended] Part 723 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations regarding the ability of federally-insured credit unions to make Member Business Loans…The majority of the rule [became] effective January 1, 2017, while the personal guarantee requirement [was] eliminated 60 days after the rule's publication in the Federal Register...” (publication was in March 2016).[3]

As a quick aside, for some specifics on nomenclature--and as a special note to those on the compliance side--when talking about “business loans” in the context of the new Member Business Lending rule, we should note the distinction between general “Commercial Loans” and statutorily defined “Member Business Loans.”  The NCUA Examiner’s Guide provides that a general “commercial loan” is “any loan, line of credit, or letter of credit (including any unfunded commitments) made to an individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or other business enterprise for commercial, industrial, agricultural, or professional purposes (but not for personal expenditure purposes). This includes any interest a credit union obtains in a commercial loan made by another lender (such as a participation) …” whereas loans “recognized as member business loans must be reported as such and kept within the statutory limit of the Federal Credit Union Act.”[4]  In an effort to address some of the confusion resulting from this distinction, the NCUA Examiner’s Guide actually contains a table listing types of loans and clarifying whether they fall within the definition of a Member Business Loan or Commercial Loan.  Let me add that—contributing to the confusion—one often sees “MBL” in articles and the media as a shorthand reference for both the “Member Business Lending and Commercial Lending” rule and a statutorily defined “Member Business Loan.”  Yet we’re talking about two different things (even though the Member Business Lending and Commercial Lending rule controls Member Business Loans). 

With the above “aside” out of the way, let’s narrow our focus on guarantees in general.  In discussing the NCUA’s amendments to the Member Business Lending and Commercial Lending rule, the National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions, on its Legislative & Regulatory Issues Webpage, noted that the amended rule “removes the prescriptive underwriting criteria and personal guarantee requirements of the current regulation, thereby eliminating the current waiver process. Instead, the rule allows credit unions to implement a principle-based risk management policy related to its commercial and business lending activities. Addressed as part of NCUA's regulatory modernization initiative, the final rule: gives credit union loan officers the ability, under certain circumstances, to not require a personal guarantee…”[5]

OK, so under the new Member Business Lending and Commercial Lending rule, credit unions in certain circumstances now have greater flexibility in determining whether to require personal guarantees.  But when has obtaining personal guarantees been a bad idea (yes, we’ve heard that requiring guarantees can have a chilling effect in some circumstances)?  We all know that when your borrower is an LLC or corporation whose assets have limited liquidation value outside of the operating entity, a guarantee from the owner can provide critical protection and leverage when problems arise. 

Which brings up a still lingering issue in connection with personal guarantees:  spousal guarantees.  For starters, it’s understandable why any lender wants a spouse’s guarantee: Married couples own their residential real estate together (via tenancy by the entirety in North Carolina; also, in North Carolina, a spouse has a marital interest in other non-residential real estate titled solely in the name of the other spouse).  If the lender has a guarantee from the owner only (and not the owner’s spouse), and “things go south,” oftentimes what turns out to be the owner/guarantor’s single largest asset—the owner’s residence—is beyond the lender’s reach because that asset is co-owned by a non-guarantor.

Here’s the wrinkle:  Regulation B, which implemented the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), provides in part, “a creditor shall not require the signature of an applicant's spouse or other person, other than a joint applicant, on any credit instrument if the applicant qualifies under the creditor's standards of creditworthiness for the amount and terms of the credit requested. A creditor shall not deem the submission of a joint financial statement or other evidence of jointly held assets as an application for joint credit.”[6]

However, back in the 80s, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System expanded the definition of “applicant” in Reg B to include “guarantors.”[7]  So, setting aside, for the moment, the argument that the interpretation of Reg B was stretched to apply to the commercial context when it was originally intended for the consumer context, it’s understandable why many, including examiners, take Reg B to mean that if an applicant (including the owner/guarantor of an entity borrower in a commercial loan transaction) is “creditworthy,” the lender should not also be looking to the applicant/owner/guarantor’s spouse for a spousal guarantee.  If a lender nevertheless goes ahead and requires a spousal guarantee as a condition to a loan in circumstances in which the owner/guarantor is already creditworthy (and the spouse is not a co-owner of the entity/borrower), and the loan then goes into default, and the lender sues the spouse/guarantor along with the entity borrower and owner/guarantor, the lender may very well be looking at a counterclaim from the spouse/guarantor for an ECOA violation. 

Up until March of 2016, many were seeing an Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Hawkins v. Community Bank of Raymore--which said that the ECOA marital status protections applied only to “applicants,” and that spouse/guarantors are not “applicants” within the purview of the ECOA--as potentially providing some relief from the historical application of Reg B as prohibiting spousal guarantees.  The Supreme Court affirmed the Eighth Circuit’s ruling, but only per an evenly split vote (because of the death of Justice Scalia).  So while the Supreme Court’s 4-4 split vote means the Eighth Circuit’s ruling in Hawkins stands as controlling authority in the seven states comprising the Eighth Circuit (Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota), the lack of a majority opinion from the Supreme Court means the Hawkins decision has no precedential effect in the other 12 circuits.  Which means that credit unions and other lenders in the other 12 circuits need to continue to carefully follow their policies with respect to the issue of spousal guarantees. 

Let’s connect the dots and sum all of this up:  The NCUA’s new Member Business Lending and Commercial Lending rule provides credit unions with greater discretion in determining whether to require personal guarantees for business loans.  But we all know that, generally speaking, personal guarantees provide added protection and leverage, and credit unions should continue to seek personal guarantees when making business loans to entity borrowers.  That said, unless your credit union is operating and making loans in the seven states comprising the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, you still have to be careful when it comes to consideration of the appropriateness of a spousal guarantee for a particular business loan.  The due diligence process that would support the justification of a spousal guarantee in certain circumstances has not changed. 


[1] NCUA 7535-01-U (Draft Final Rule, 2/18/2016)
[2] Id.
[3] National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions (Legislative & Regulatory Issues Webpage) - http://www.nafcu.org/mbl/
[4] National Credit Union Association Examiner’s Guide – Commercial and Member Business Loans - https://publishedguides.ncua.gov/examiner/Pages/Content/ExaminersGuide/MBL/Intro.htm
[5] National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions (Legislative & Regulatory Issues Webpage) - http://www.nafcu.org/mbl/
[6] 12 C.F.R. § 1002.7(d)(1)
[7] 12 C.F.R. § 1002.2(e), previously 12 C.F.R. § 202.2(e)

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Nexsen Pruet, PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Nexsen Pruet, PLLC
Contact
more
less

Nexsen Pruet, PLLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.