The Palmaz Plan: Investors Can Have Their Direct D&O Claims But Not The D&O Insurance Proceeds #WinningWhileLosing

by Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

In In re Palmaz Scientific Inc., the bankruptcy court for the Western District of Texas determined that a confirmed plan of reorganization would not stop a group of investors from pursuing direct (non-derivative) claims against directors and officers of the debtor companies because plan injunction language only covered claims against the debtors.  2018 WL 1036780, at *5 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2018) (slip op. at 11).  Unfortunately for the investor plaintiffs, this proved to be a success without victory because the court went on to hold that the plan precluded the investors from using the D&O insurance proceeds to satisfy their claims.  Id. at *7 (slip op. at 14).  This case is both a cautionary tale for claimants and a potential boon for post-confirmation trustees.

When (and why) do D&O Insurance Proceeds become the coveted prize?

When D&O claims are asserted against a distressed company and/or its directors and officers, all parties look to the D&O insurance proceeds to satisfy their claims and/or fund their defenses.  If the business seeks chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, the bankruptcy court must determine which parties are entitled to access and utilize such proceeds.  Usually, the issue is framed for the court as a question of whether the D&O insurance proceeds constitute property of the bankruptcy estate, but, ultimately, the real question is whether the proceeds are available to satisfy claims against a debtor and/or its directors and officers.  Post-confirmation (after a bankruptcy plan has been approved by the court), investors and equity holders of a failed business may find themselves fighting with a post-confirmation trustee for access to D&O insurance proceeds.  In this scenario, the post-confirmation trustee will almost always claim that the policy and its proceeds belong to the post-confirmation trust because D&O insurance policies are often wasting policies (and one of the most valuable assets available to post-confirmation trusts).  Of course, D&O claimants, as well as directors and officers, will disagree.  To them, D&O insurance policies are the very source of proceeds that was purchased in order to protect and benefit directors and officers and D&O claimants.

How do courts typically determine who the prize winner is?

To resolve the “proceeds” dispute, bankruptcy courts look to the language of the confirmed plan, the confirmation order, and any trust agreement (that transfers assets from the bankruptcy estate to the post-confirmation trust).  The analysis usually consists of determining whether the D&O claims belong to the post-confirmation trustee (as opposed to investors, equity holders or any other potential plaintiffs).  Thus, depending on the types of claims asserted (for example, direct versus derivative) and the language of the governing documents, bankruptcy courts may prevent or enjoin “would be” plaintiffs from proceeding with their claims against debtors and/or former directors and officers.  Indeed, in relatively recent years, post-confirmation trustees have been losing the battle over insurance proceeds when the claims asserted are direct rather than derivative.  See, e.g., In re SemCrude, L.P., 2011 WL 4711891 (Bankr. D. Del. Oct. 7, 2011) (“Sem Crude I”) (claims were derivative, and, thus, property of the estate that had been transferred to the post-confirmation trustee, because the plaintiffs’ alleged injury was the same as the harm the debtor suffered), and subsequently aff’d, 796 F.3d 310 (3d Cir. 2015) (“Sem Crude II”); see also In re Palmaz Scientific Inc., 562 B.R. 331, 63 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 99 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2016) (direct claims were not covered by the plan injunction but other claims that were common to all investors, and therefore derivative, were subject to the injunction and could only be asserted by the trustee).

Can the prize winner be the loser?

Based on Palmaz, a claimant may be entitled to pursue D&O claims but unable to access D&O insurance proceeds.  See In re Palmaz Scientific Inc., 2018 WL 1036780, at *5-*7 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2018) (slip op. at 11-14).  Of course, this is like saying “you can have the car, but not the keys.”  So, how can this happen?  In short, the holding in Palmaz was based on a particular plan provision that was quite possibly initially understood by all parties to mean one thing but later interpreted by the court to mean another.

Before the bankruptcies were filed, a group of investors sued the debtors and two directors and officers.  The action was stayed (temporarily put on hold) when the bankruptcy petitions were filed, but came back to life after the bankruptcy court approved the debtors’ joint plan.  As is often the case, the debtors’ confirmed plan created a litigation trust and transferred certain of the debtors’ assets, including D&O claims, to the litigation trust.  The plan defined D&O Claims to include claims against Debtors but not former directors and officers, so the investor plaintiffs amended their state court complaint to drop claims against the debtors (presumably because these claims were understood to belong to the post-confirmation trust).  With their live complaint against only the directors and officers, the investor plaintiffs made a demand on their D&O claims against the debtors’ D&O insurance policy.  The insurance company sought a declaratory judgment from the bankruptcy court to determine whether the demand violated the confirmed plan’s bankruptcy injunction, and the litigation trustee joined in the motion.  None of this is unusual; however, the litigation trustee argued that the post-confirmation trust controlled all of the D&O insurance recoveries.  This argument probably came as a surprise to the investor plaintiffs.

Specifically, the litigation trustee argued that the investors’ demand for insurance coverage (i) violated the plan’s bankruptcy injunction; and (ii) interfered with the litigation trustee’s right to control D&O insurance recoveries.  In response, the investor plaintiffs relied on a line of cases that hold “even where insurance policies themselves are property of the estate, non-debtor insureds have a right equal to the debtor to the benefits provided by such policies.”  Id. at *7 (citations omitted) (slip op. at 14).  The bankruptcy court found these cases were inapplicable because “none of those cases involve[d] plan provisions similar to those [that were] before the Court,” and ultimately, ruled in favor of the post-confirmation trustee.  Id.  Ultimately, the court rejected the post-confirmation trustee’s first argument and accepted the second because the plan gave the litigation trustee the right to control D&O claims “and all D&O Insurance Recoveries.”  Id. at *6 (slip op. at 13).  The language actually used in the plan was as follows:

“The right to control the D&O Claims and all D&O Insurance Recoveries, including negotiations relating thereto and settlements thereof, shall be vested in the Litigation Trust on and after the Effective Date.”

Id. at *7 (slip op. at 13).  Significant to the court’s decision was the plan’s broad definition of D&O Insurance Recoveries, which included “the right to pursue and receive the benefits and/or proceeds of the D&O Insurance Policies.”  Id.  According to the express plan provisions, the post-confirmation trustee did not have the exclusive right to assert claims against former directors and officers but had all rights with respect to any and all D&O insurance proceeds.  Practically speaking, then, the investor plaintiffs’ legal ability to pursue their claims was of little value to them because the proceeds were not available to them.

Is there any real prospective power behind the punch in Palmaz?

Palmaz suggests that post-confirmation trustees may be able to control D&O insurance proceeds, keeping the proceeds all to themselves, by negotiating for a simple plan provision.  Of course, this would benefit all post-confirmation trustees because they are responsible for maximizing the value of trust assets in order to increase distributions to trust beneficiaries.  However, Palmaz puts potential claimants on notice that plan provisions may – intentionally or unintentionally – give post-confirmation trustees any and all rights over any and all proceeds of D&O insurance policies (regardless of the types of claims asserted).  Based on mere speculation, the parties in Palmaz likely intended for the post-confirmation trustee to have control over all D&O Insurance Recoveries with respect to D&O Claims belonging to the post-confirmation trust.  In other words, the parties probably did not expect for the post-confirmation trustee to have control over proceeds that related to direct claims against directors and officers.  Going forward, in light of Palmaz, claimants and other parties in interest will likely pay closer attention to plan provisions that relate, even tangentially, to D&O claims, policies, proceeds, and recoveries.

On top of providing a cautionary tale and a potential tool (or trick) to be used by post-confirmation trustees, does Palmaz permit post-confirmation trustees to control insurance proceeds without showing that the proceeds – as opposed to the policies – were property of the debtors’ estates (and, therefore, property of post-confirmation trusts)?  Maybe, but the clear takeaway is that in cases where debtors have D&O insurance policies, parties should carefully review all relevant plan provisions to make sure they are – or are not – similar to the one used in Palmaz.  At a minimum, Palmaz is a reminder that the pen is powerful.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.