The Plaintiff Who Knew Too Much: First Circuit Dismisses Effort to Toll Statute of Limitations

by Pierce Atwood LLP

On June 3, 2014, the First Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action filed by a group of former workers in a French luggage factory against Bain Capital, LLC in the District of Massachusetts. The case exemplifies the court’s approach to a named plaintiff’s assertion of the doctrines of fraudulent concealment and equitable estoppel in an effort to toll a statute of limitations.

Plaintiff Murielle Abdallah sought to represent workers in a French luggage factory owned by Samsonite. She alleged that an investment group led by Bain, which owned a controlling stake in Samsonite, wanted to close the unprofitable factory. Allegedly to avoid making mandatory severance payments to employees who would be laid off by the closure, Samsonite formed a wholly owned subsidiary, NewCo, to which it transferred the factory. In 2005, Samsonite sold NewCo for one euro to a third party, HB Group, which was controlled by Jean-Jacques Aurel. On February 15, 2007, a French court ordered liquidation of the factory, which resulted in Abdallah’s and her coworkers’ terminations.

After HB Group was unable to pay workers mandatory post-termination benefits, Abdallah and her coworkers filed a lawsuit in French civil court against Samsonite and its shareholders, including Bain. Bain asserted that it was a “stranger to the contracts and all the acts that pertained to the litigation,” and on that basis the French court declared Bain “exterior to the annulment procedure.” A French labor court ruled that Samsonite never ceased being their employer, but held that it had no jurisdiction over Bain due to the civil court’s findings.

In 2011, Mr. Aurel provided an affidavit to Abdallah asserting that a Bain representative was present at meetings concerning the alleged factory transfer scheme, and that Samsonite’s representative sought the assent of Bain’s representative to key elements of the plan. Abdallah claimed that she first learned that Bain orchestrated the transfer of the factory through this affidavit.

Unsatisfied with the remedies obtained in French courts, Abdallah sued Bain in the District of Massachusetts in November 2011. The district court dismissed the complaint, as well as a second complaint she filed in 2012, as time-barred. Abdallah appealed the dismissal of the second complaint.

The following facts were undisputed: (1) Abdallah’s claim accrued on February 15, 2007, the date of the court-ordered factory liquidation and the date that her job loss became certain; (2) Abdallah’s claims were subject to a three-year statute of limitations, (3) the suit against Bain from which the appeal was taken commenced on October 20, 2012. On these facts, the court recognized that the lawsuit must be dismissed unless a basis for tolling the statute of limitations applied. The court then rejected both bases Abdallah presented for tolling the limitations period: fraudulent concealment and equitable tolling.

The court explained that fraudulent concealment may toll the statute of limitations if, by an affirmative act perpetrated with the intent to deceive, the wrongdoer concealed the existence of a cause of action. However, it will not toll the statute if the plaintiff had actual knowledge of the facts giving rise to a claim. Similarly, equitable tolling provides no relief if a plaintiff knows of facts sufficient to bring the cause action; it applies only if the plaintiff could not have discovered information essential to the lawsuit using reasonable diligence.

Applying these principles, the court determined that Abdallah knew before 2009 what Samsonite had done, as evidenced by the rulings she obtained against Samsonite in the French courts in 2008. As for what she knew about Bain’s actions before 2009, the court held that “[i]t took no imagination—or implausible allegation—to suggest that Samsonite’s owners must have authorized such a major and highly visible financial transaction by the company they had just acquired.” In any event, the court observed, Abdallah had sued Bain in French civil court, and had argued in both French courts that Bain had a hand in the challenged transactions.

After rejecting a procedural argument that it found Abdallah had waived, the court addressed her argument that she was unable to file suit against Bain in the United States before 2011 because she had not discovered facts necessary to bring suit until she had obtained Mr. Aurel’s affidavit. The court held that any new details she learned through the affidavit were not essential to bringing suit, and that the running of the limitations period does not await a plaintiff learning all facts relevant to a claim. “That is what discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is for. Equitable tolling does not apply when a plaintiff has facts essential for the commencement of a suit (nor does it always apply when a plaintiff does not have such facts).” Also, although the court expressly did not decide whether Abdallah would have a claim absent the running of the statute of limitations, it nevertheless observed that “allegations that a parent directs or controls particular actions by a subsidiary are generally not enough to render the parent liable for all torts related to those actions.”

Finally, the court addressed Abdallah’s argument that Bain should be estopped from arguing she had knowledge of her claims before 2011 because it had represented to a French court that it was “a stranger to the contracts and to all the acts that pertained to the litigation.” The court rejected this argument too, because Abdallah did not rely on that denial, but persisted with her claims in spite of it. The court noted that even if she had relied on Bain’s denial and Bain had known that she would do so, no authority supports tolling the limitations period where the plaintiff suspects a lie advanced in defense of a suit but continues with the lawsuit anyway. “The better recourse, upon discovering such a lie, is to return to the original forum and seek to have the case reopened.” The court concluded: “In any event, we need only hold here that Bain’s general assertion that it was a ‘stranger to’ the Samsonite transaction, which assertion neither contested the specific facts known by Abdallah, nor persuaded her to drop her suit against Bain, provides no basis for tolling the statute of limitations.”


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pierce Atwood LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Pierce Atwood LLP

Pierce Atwood LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.