The Potential Declawing of the SEC: The Financial CHOICE Act

by Orrick - Securities Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement Group

The Financial CHOICE Act (or “CHOICE Act 2.0”), which would significantly narrow the SEC’s ability to bring enforcement actions and make it more challenging for it to prevail in such actions, is inching its way towards becoming law. On May 4, 2017, the Financial Services Committee passed the Act and it is now slated to be introduced to the House in the coming weeks. As part of the push by the current administration to deregulate, this bill aims to repeal key provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, including those directed towards the SEC.  Although the Act has a long way to go before it is enacted, many of its provisions would have far-reaching consequences and would change the way the SEC operates as we know it.

Should the CHOICE Act 2.0 become law, the following are some of the more important effects it would have on the SEC’s enforcement abilities:


– Fewer Administrative Proceedings, and Proceedings that are Less Favorable to the SEC. The Act would give respondents in SEC enforcement actions the right to transfer their cases from administrative tribunals to federal district courts. Respondents could avoid having their cases heard by in-house administrative law judges, and instead proceed in what is often viewed as a less biased federal tribunal that maintains greater procedural and evidentiary safeguards. Moreover, if the action were to move forward in an administrative proceeding, the Act would change the standard of proof for the SEC from preponderance of the evidence to clear and convincing evidence. The likely result of these changes, should they take effect, would be to decrease in the number of administrative proceedings brought by the SEC, an outcome that many view as favorable for defendants.

– Limitations on the SEC’s Ability to Try Novel Theories or Create Rulemaking by Enforcement. Under the Choice Act 2.0, the SEC would be required to provide adequate notice, in the form of an approved statement or guidance, detailing what is considered unlawful conduct before it may bring an enforcement action based on such conduct. This change strips the SEC of flexibility to create new theories of liability within an existing rubric, or to effectively create new law. Though it is too early to tell how this change would be applied or enforced, it is reasonable to believe that unless the SEC has issued clear guidance, defendants would escape liability.

– No Judicial Deference to the SEC’s Interpretations of Laws it Administers. The CHOICE Act 2.0 would statutorily repeal the so-called Chevron doctrine, which currently bestows deference to the SEC’s interpretations of its laws in legal proceedings. Again, this change would make it more difficult for the SEC to prevail in an enforcement action.

– Required Coordination with Other Agencies. The Act also requires agencies, including the SEC, to coordinate with Federal and State authorities when bringing administrative or judicial actions. The SEC would be required to: (1) minimize duplication of efforts with other authorities; (2) establish when joint investigations are necessary, appropriate, and in the public interest; and (3) establish a lead agency in joint investigations. Take, for example, a situation where both the SEC and DOJ were considering investigating the same individual or entity. Although the SEC would presumably be allowed to continue a joint investigation if it is determined to be in the public interest, it may be forced yield control to the DOJ as the lead investigator, and would give reprieve to investigatees who would no longer be stretched to simultaneously respond to two full-blown investigations.

– Limit on Whistleblower Awards. Under the Act, co-conspirators would be barred from receiving whistleblower awards if they were “responsible for, or complicit in, the violation of the securities laws for which the whistleblower provided information to the Commission.” There have been numerous whistleblower actions in recent years, including by whistleblowers who were engaged in the misconduct at issue. In the past, those whistleblowers were not only given an award, but often an exculpatory pass as well. Moving forward, such whistleblowers would no longer receive an award and could find themselves facing liability for the misconduct, therefore likely reducing the number of claims raised.

-No More D&O Bars. The CHOICE Act 2.0 would repeal the SEC’s authority to bar individuals from serving as directors or officers in administrative proceedings.

Each of these provisions either reduces the authority that the SEC currently enjoys, or makes it more difficult for the SEC to prevail in the actions it does bring, or both. Should the CHOICE Act 2.0 be passed, it would likely reduce SEC enforcement activity and give more predictable results, both of which would be favorably received by companies and their directors and officers alike.  In particular, financial institutions and investment companies, which are heavily regulated by federal securities laws, would reap the benefits of the proposed changes.  While there remain several potential congressional obstacles to the Act, and we do not know what its final form will be if it becomes law, given its significant potential impact it certainly is deserving of discussion.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick - Securities Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement Group | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Orrick - Securities Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement Group

Orrick - Securities Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement Group on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.