The real deal? R&E amortization may be here to stay

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Contact

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) included a sunset provision for immediate expensing of research and experimentation (R&E) expenditures, generally providing that such expenses would be subject to five-year (domestic R&E) or fifteen-year (foreign R&E) amortization for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021. Despite repeated attempts to repeal or delay the provision, we are now well into the new framework’s effective period. This alert summarizes recent developments regarding the treatment of R&E expenditures and provides insight into lingering taxpayer questions and what guidance may be on the horizon.

Out with the old, in with the new

The TCJA amended section 174 for amounts paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021. Under former section 174, taxpayers generally had the option to deduct reasonable R&E expenditures in the taxable year in which they were paid or incurred in connection with a trade or business or to amortize R&E expenditures ratably over no less than five years. As a result, taxpayers had the option to either claim tax deductions currently, or defer them to a later tax year depending on the taxpayer’s specific tax posture. Taxpayers also had the option to elect ten-year amortization for certain R&E expenditures under sections 174(f)(2) and 59(e).

The TCJA eliminated the option to take a current deduction for R&E expenditures. Under new section 174, specified R&E expenditures are required to be charged to capital account and amortized over five years (or fifteen years for foreign research), following a half-year convention. Foreign research for purposes of section 174 includes any research conducted outside the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any possession of the United States. Specified R&E expenditures include R&E expenditures paid or incurred by the taxpayer in the taxable year in connection with its trade or business, and the revised statute explicitly treats software development expenses as an R&E expenditure. Under new section 174, taxpayers may not accelerate the recovery of R&E expenditures upon the disposition, retirement, or abandonment of property with respect to which the R&E expenditures were incurred. Rather, amortization of the R&E expenditures continues for the entire five- or fifteen-year period, as applicable.

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: New section 174 applies to “specified R&E expenditures” rather than the general reference to “R&E expenditures” under former section 174. It appears that despite the new terminology, the TCJA may not have significantly altered the definition of R&E expenditures within the scope of section 174. One of the issues that is expected to be addressed in forthcoming guidance is the precise meaning of specified R&E expenditures. Although Treas. Reg. section 1.174-2 has not yet been amended and remains in effect regarding the definition of R&E expenditures, it is anticipated that forthcoming guidance may clarify the meaning of specified R&E expenditures. At a minimum, new section 174 incorporates software development expenses within its scope. Prior to the TCJA, the IRS had provided in Rev. Proc. 2000-50 that it would not disturb the treatment of software development expenses as either deductible or amortizable, at the option of the taxpayer, in accordance with former section 174. The government reasoned that software development expenses were so similar to R&E expenditures under section 174 as to warrant similar treatment. However, taxpayers also had the option to amortize software development expenses over three years in accordance with section 167(f)(1). Subsequent to the statutory changes to section 174, taxpayers are prohibited from relying on Rev. Proc. 2000-50 and may no longer deduct the costs of software development. Thus, aligning the treatment of software development expenses with the treatment of R&E expenditures under section 174 is not a novel concept. However, required five- or fifteen-year, as applicable, amortization of software development expenses will be a marked change in the treatment of those costs. With these modifications, there are enhanced questions about the distinction between specified R&E expenditures and amounts that may be treated as ordinary and necessary business expenses. It is hoped that forthcoming guidance will clarify these distinctions.

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: As revised, section 174 provides that if a taxpayer disposes of, retires, or abandons property resulting from R&E expenditures during the amortization period for specified R&E expenditures, no deduction is allowed and amortization shall continue over the remaining amortization period. This provision may require continuing amortization, which will be protected with respect to non-US specified R&E and should be considered with certain acquisitions and dispositions. It is unclear from current guidance which entity is the appropriate entity to take into account the R&E amortization following an acquisition or disposition. 

Procedural guidance under new Section 174

On December 12, 2022, the IRS and Treasury issued Rev. Proc. 2023-8, providing procedural guidance under which taxpayers could implement the TCJA’s required amortization for R&E expenditures and software development costs previously subject to Rev. Proc. 2000-50. 

Under Rev. Proc. 2023-8, taxpayers may receive automatic consent to change their methods of accounting for R&E expenditures to comply with the required amortization provision. Further, the guidance provides streamlined procedures whereby taxpayers may attach a statement to their return in lieu of filing a Form 3115 for their first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2021. Changes made for the first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2021, are made on a cut-off basis, and changes for later years are made with a modified section 481(a) adjustment, taking into account only those R&E expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021. The procedural guidance waives the five-year eligibility rule only for changes made in the first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2021.

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: Importantly, Rev. Proc. 2023-8 specifically excludes changes in the treatment of R&E expenditures under section 174 or to changes in the treatment of computer software under Rev. Proc. 2000-50 in tax years beginning before 2022. Rev. Proc. 2023-8 further denies audit protection for R&E expenditures paid or incurred before 2022 and states that no inference should be drawn regarding both the treatment of R&E expenditures paid or incurred as well as accounting method changes made under former section 174. This determination coupled with the obsolescence of Rev. Proc. 58-74 leaves taxpayers with errors for R&E expenditures in tax years prior to 2022 with limited options regarding corrections. This result seems unduly harsh in light of the statutory changes to section 174, which have resulted in enhanced review of previous R&E expenditures.

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: Under the five-year eligibility rule, a taxpayer is generally precluded from making an automatic method change for an item for which it has changed its method within the last five years. The IRS and Treasury often waive this rule for a limited period of time in conjunction with automatic change procedures provided to implement new regulatory or legislative provisions. However, this waiver is often provided for the first three years following the effective date of a new provision. Limiting the waiver only to the first effective year of required R&E amortization is a marked change in this practice, and taxpayers should take note to ensure they are not scoped out of using the automatic procedures to implement section 174 amortization.

The government has not yet released any substantive guidance under new section 174.

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: Guidance under section 174 took a backseat to other guidance projects, especially in light of the broad speculation that the R&E amortization provision would be delayed or repealed. While the government is actively working on substantive guidance under section 174, that project is still in its early stages. The government rushed to drop the procedural guidance before 2022 year-end in response accounting firms marketing a planning opportunity that would take advantage of a multi-year waiver of the five-year eligibility rule.

Effort to roll back TCJA R&E amortization

Congress has made persistent attempts to delay or repeal required amortization of R&E expenditures prior to the provision becoming effective. The House-passed version of the Build Back Better Act included a provision that would have delayed implementation of required R&E amortization to 2026. Similarly, an early version of the CHIPS and Science Act included a provision repealing required R&E amortization. According to the Tax Foundation, rolling back the TCJA amendments to section 174 would result in a 15 percent larger economy, a 26 percent larger capital stock value, 12 percent higher wages in the United States, and 30,600 full-time equivalent jobs.1 While these efforts to delay or repeal the amortization provision have had broad bipartisan support, none have been successful. 

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: Because of the deferred effective date for the TCJA amendments to section 174, there seemed to be ample time for the IRS and Treasury to issue procedural and substantive guidance to direct taxpayers in their effort to effectuate the required changes. Moreover, continued talks of repealing or further delaying the section 174 amendments impacted the government’s prioritization of section 174 guidance, particularly considering the numerous TCJA provisions that required immediate implementation and the several pieces of tax legislation that have been enacted since. Even after the release of procedural guidance in December 2022, many speculated the effective date of required R&E amortization would be delayed. Now taxpayers and the government are scrambling to implement the provision for 2022 tax years, amidst continued efforts to delay or repeal required R&E amortization.

Although we are now in the effective period of new section 174, the efforts to delay or repeal required R&E amortization continue. In March, Senators Maggie Hassan and Todd Yong re-introduced a bipartisan bill to roll back the amortization provision and to expand eligibility for the research credit under section 41. In April, Representatives Ron Estes and John Larson reintroduced, along with nearly 60 cosponsors, a bipartisan bill that would repeal the TCJA amendments to section 174 and allow businesses to deduct R&E expenditures in the year in which they are incurred. Senators Estes and Larson have been introducing similar bills since September of 2019. Most recently, on June 9, Republicans on the House Ways and Means Committee introduced the Build It in America Act2 as part of a larger tax package sent to the House floor. The Build It in America Act includes a provision that would retroactively restore research and development expensing through 2025, along with other expired tax incentives.

Rev. Rul. 2023-8

In Rev. Rul. 2023-8, released April 12, the IRS obsoleted Rev. Rul. 58-74. The ruling suggested an incorrect application of section 174 could be corrected with an amended return rather than an accounting method change requiring a Form 3115. By revoking Rev. Rul. 58-74, the IRS has made clear its view that an amended return may not be used to correct missed R&E expenditures. The IRS indicated that it was eliminating the ruling because it did not provide enough factual support for distinguishing an error from a method change. The elimination of Rev. Rul. 58-74 is effective July 31, 2023, which means that taxpayers may continue to use amended returns to correct erroneous treatment for R&E expenditures. The delayed effective date appears to have been chosen to provide notice to taxpayers relying on Rev. Rul. 58-74 with respect to amended returns that were in process when the older revenue procedure was obsoleted. 

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: Obsoleting Rev. Rul. 58-74 is consistent with recent IRS guidance that treats changes in treatment of section 174 costs as changes in methods of accounting. While Rev. Rul. 2023-8 is not inherently related to implementation of new section 174, Rev. Rul. 58-74 likely came to light during the IRS’s review of existing guidance in place under section 174 in the process of drafting new substantive and implementation guidance.

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: In light of the obsolescence of Rev. Rul. 58-74, it is important to note that taxpayers with outstanding amended returns involving R&E expenditures should anticipate enhanced scrutiny. It is expected that taxpayers will be asked for proof regarding the underlying expenses, the taxpayer’s established practices and whether the practice rises to a method of accounting. Enhanced substantiation should also be expected with any such amended returns. The IRS indicated an expectation of enhanced substantiation when the IRS released Chief Counsel Memorandum 2021410F addressing research credit claims.

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: It would not be surprising if the IRS revisits other pieces of guidance under section 174 in the near future, including Rev. Proc. 2000-50, particularly as taxpayers and practitioners scrutinize the effect of explicitly drawing software expenses within the scope of new section 174. 

Forthcoming Section 174 guidance

Treasury and the IRS are actively working on substantive guidance under new section 174, which they hope to release as an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The much-anticipated guidance is expected to include definitions, particularly concerning the scope of computer software costs that fall under section 174, rules governing the allocation of costs between domestic and foreign R&E expenditures, and examples demonstrating application of the new guidance.

Eversheds Sutherland Observation: While Treasury and the IRS have indicated the substantive guidance under section 174 is a high-priority project, this guidance is still in its very early stages and is unlikely to be released this year, much less in time for 2022 return filing. The substantive regulations under section 174 are expected to be a collaborative effort between IT&A and PSI, with IT&A taking the lead.
Eversheds Sutherland Observation: The government hopes to address the scope of section 174 in the substantive guidance, including a focus on the distinction between deductible section 162 expenses and amortizable section 174 expenditures. This distinction was not a huge point of concern under former section 174 when taxpayers were able to currently deduct R&E expenditures. Now, as the treatment of the two types of expenses diverges under new section 174, the distinction will face more scrutiny.

________

Tax Foundation, Amortizing Research and Development Expenses Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, February 5, 2019.

2 H.R.3938, 118th Cong. (2023), https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/3938.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Contact
more
less

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide