The Seventh Amendment Right to Jury for Violations of the Commodity Exchange Act – Part II

Ulmer & Berne LLP
Contact

This is the second part of a two-part article discussing a defendant’s Seventh Amendment right to jury in an enforcement action by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under the Commodity Exchange Act for civil monetary penalties.  Part I analyzed existing Supreme Court cases regarding the scope of the right to jury in regulatory enforcement cases.  It concluded that the existing cases should expand the right to include a jury determination of the amount of civil penalty.  It proposed that defendants in CEA enforcement actions make a jury demand notwithstanding existing case law.  In Part II, so that juries can be properly instructed, the article examines lower court cases where courts have determined the amounts of civil penalties for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act.  It concludes that the law is in disarray and the decisions are inconsistent.  It proposes that juries use a new method for determining civil penalties under the CEA that is organically related to the conduct regulated by the statute.

I.  EXISTING CASE LAW DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CEA

Part I of this Article concluded that the Seventh Amendment right to jury should be expanded in enforcement cases in federal court for alleged violations of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1-26 [hereinafter “CEA”], to include not just whether the defendant violated the statute but also the amount of the civil penalty.  If juries are going to determine the amount of the civil monetary penalty, they must be properly instructed.  Unfortunately, the case law is in disarray.

Subsection (A) of § 13a-1(d)(1) of the CEA states “on a proper showing” a civil penalty should be assessed of not more than the greater of $182,031 (adjusted for inflation) or triple the monetary gain to the defendant “for each violation.” The CEA provides no guidance, however, on what constitutes a “proper showing” or what constitutes “each” violation.  As one court notes the CEA does not “provide any instruction to the district courts as to the appropriate considerations in assessing a civil penalty under 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1.”[1]  In § 13a-1(d) cases, courts consider certain factors that are or were included in CEA § 9a even though § 9a does not apply to actions in federal court.[2] These factors include the gravity of the offense, the defendant’s net worth, and collectability of the fine.[3]  Courts also consider certain factors developed judicially; such as, the impact of the violations on the victims, the relationship of the violation to the regulatory purpose of the CEA, and whether the amount is rationally related to the offense.[4]

As to how to determine the number of violations, the CFTC has argued inconsistent positions depending on what is most advantageous under the circumstances of each case instead of adopting a principled approach.  Courts have been asked to determine the number of violations based on (i) the counts in the CFTC’s complaint;[5] (ii) the victims;[6] (iii) the days the violative conduct continued;[7] (iv) the gain to the defendant;[8] and (v) the types of illegal behavior by the defendant.[9]  In one non-manipulation case, the CFTC argued that an arbitrary $1 million surcharge should be imposed.[10]

The result is that a defendant’s exposure is totally unpredictable and there is no consistency among the civil monetary penalties actually imposed.  For example, at one end of the spectrum, in CFTC v. Fluery, [11] the district court assessed a civil penalty in the amount of the statutory minimum for one violation ($120,000 at the time) because it found there was a single fraudulent scheme even though the evidence showed defendants operated a public website for a “significant period of time” through which they defrauded “numerous” investors resulting in a $3.2 million gain to the defendants.  In another case, CFTC v. King,[12] the court set the civil penalty at 10% of the gain to the defendant (10% of $4.5 million) based on his inability to pay even though at least 60 customers were defrauded of $9 million.  At the other end of the spectrum, in CFTC v. Gramalegui,[13] the court assessed a civil penalty based on triple the gain to the defendant ($480,690 X 3 = $1,442,070) because he “committed literally hundreds of individual violations of the CEA” where he fraudulently solicited numerous customers by misrepresenting the risks and performance of his trading system.  In Fleury the court had discretion to find that solicitation of each customer via the website constituted a separate violation and could have assessed the penalty at the minimum statutory amount times the number of customers, or it could have trebled the $3.2 million gain to the defendants.  Or, in Gramalegui the court had discretion to find that there was a single scheme and could have assessed a penalty of only the statutory minimum (about $175,000) instead of $1.4 million.  This disparity in method and uncertainty of outcomes would not be tolerated in criminal sentencing.  Further, the lack of uniformity is unfortunate because defendants should be able at the outset of a case to estimate their maximum exposure and rationally decide whether to settle the charges or plan their defense accordingly.[14]

Two Circuit Courts of Appeals have identified the problem of determining the number of violations of the CEA but neither really devised a specific methodology based on the statute.  In Slusser v. CFTC,[15] the Seventh Circuit vacated a CFTC administrative decision that assessed a $10 million civil penalty.[16]  The complaint contained six counts and charged one violation per count.[17]  The appellate court vacated the civil penalty, but instead of demonstrating how to calculate the correct amount the appellate court remanded the case to the agency for “proceedings consistent with this opinion.”  While helpful in understanding the complexity of the issue, the appellate court’s opinion does not offer a specific solution.

[T]here is a serious problem with the $10 million fine.  …  The maximum penalty [at the time under 7 U.S.C. § 9(3) was] $100,000 per violation.  The complaint filed by the Division of Enforcement listed only six violations.  Most of the violations narrated by the complaint entail multiple acts or statutes; it would have been easy to separate the events into tens if not hundreds of violations, or to allege that each day of managing the funds without registration as a commodity pool operator was a separate violation.  But the CFTC’s staff did not do any of these things, ….  Just as the sentence in a criminal case is limited by the number of counts alleged in an indictment times the maximum punishment for each offense, so the penalty in an administrative prosecution is limited by the number of violations alleged in the complaint times the maximum fine per violation.  A reasonable person in Slusser’s position would have assumed that a maximum exposure was $600,000 and financed his defense accordingly.

***  The statutory cap applies person-by-person, as well as violation-by-violation, so the CFTC may be able to justify a total penalty as high as $1.8 million [3 X the maximum per violation] ….[18]

In CFTC v. Levy,[19] the complaint contained only one count but the CFTC alleged multiple specific misrepresentations made to numerous particular customers, and then further alleged that “[e]ach material representation and omission [by the defendant firm and its representatives], including, but not limited to, those specifically alleged herein, is a separate and distinct violation [of the CEA].”  Five customers actually testified at a bench trial,[20] and the district court found that the defendant violated the CEA twenty-five times—five misrepresentations to each testifying customer.[21]  Defendant argued that the district court was limited to imposing a civil penalty of one-time the maximum amount ($120,000) because there was only one count in the complaint.  The CFTC advocated the penalty should be imposed based on all of the victims instead of just the five who testified. [22]  The district court imposed a penalty of five times the maximum amount ($600,000), electing to treat all misrepresentations made to one customer as a single violation.[23]  The appellate court affirmed the amount of the civil penalty because it was “rationally related and proportionate to [defendant’s] multiple offenses and the undeniable need to deter him from committing similar violations in the future.”[24]

In sum, even though the CEA specifies a dollar range of civil penalty that should be imposed for each violation, neither the CFTC nor the lower federal courts have adopted a consistent method for determining the number of violations proved.  Consequently, the defendants’ exposure is unknowable at the commencement of the action and the civil penalties actually imposed by the lower federal courts are inconsistent.

II.  DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF CEA VIOLATIONS BASED ON CATEGORIES OF CONDUCT REGULATED BY THE ACT

Both Slusser and Levy agree that the determination of the violations and the amount of civil penalty should be based on—and is limited by—the number of violations of which a defendant is fairly put on notice by the complaint.  This is certainly a good start but the problem is that the defendant’s exposure becomes a function of the drafting prowess of the CFTC and is not necessarily anchored to the misconduct proven at trial.

Instead, the number of violations of the CEA should be organically related to the conduct regulated by the statute.  In a customer protection case, the jury (or for now the judge) should determine the number of violations of the CEA by asking the following questions related to the types of behaviors regulated by the CEA:

(1) Was the defendant properly registered to engage in the activities?

(a) providing trading advice for a fee without being registered;

(b) improperly claiming an exemption from registration;

(c) being registered in one category (such as, an associated person of a futures commission merchant) but acting without registration in another category (such as, a commodity pool operator).

(2) Did the defendant employ fraudulent means to obtain funds from the investors?

(a) oral or written misrepresentations relating to qualifications, past performance, risks of trading, or the commodities to be traded;

(b) omission(s) of material facts;

(c) unlawful use of websites;

(d) high pressure tactics.

(3) Did the defendant apply the investor’s funds in the way he said he would?

(a) depositing all funds with a futures commission merchant;

(b) not commingling customer funds with each other or the defendant’s funds;

(c) not misappropriating funds for personal use;

(d) not overcharging customers;

(e) only trading the commodities authorized by the customer;

(f) only trading strategies approved by the customer.

(4) Did the defendant properly account for the investor’s funds?

(a) maintain all required books and records;

(b) provide investors with complete, timely and accurate reports of profits and losses;

(c) respond promptly to CFTC inquiries and produce required documents.

Assuming the complaint gives the defendant reasonable notice, if the evidence at trial shows the defendant was not registered, falsely represented the risk of investing, traded pork bellies instead of US treasury bonds, and lied to investors about losses, the jury (or judge) should find that there are four violations—not hundreds of violations.  The number of victims, the amount of money obtained, how long the activity lasted, the defendant’s profits, or how many victims testified should be considered as aggravating or mitigating factors but not as separate violations.

For example, assume in one case Defendant A was not registered and fraudulently solicited $5 million from one wealthy investor by misrepresenting the risk of trading S&P futures.  Three million dollars was lost trading in the S&P market including $100,000 in commissions paid to Defendant A.  In another case, Defendant B was registered and legally solicited $5 million of customer funds from 100 victims by promising to trade Eurodollar options, but instead he misappropriated the money to build a home for himself.  Irrespective of how many counts the complaint contains, Defendant A should be found to have committed two violations and assessed a civil penalty in the range of $300,000 – $363,063, representing triple the gain to Defendant A (3 X $100,000) or two times the statutory per violation minimum of $182,031.  Defendant B should be found to have committed one violation and assessed a civil penalty in the range of $182,031 – $15 million, representing the statutory per violation minimum for one violation of $181,031 or triple the gain to Defendant B (3 X $5 million).  As aggravating or mitigating factors, the jury (or judge) should consider the number of victims, the losses to the customers, and the length of time, to determine the appropriate penalty within the statutory range.  Since Defendant B’s conduct injured more victims and he misappropriated customer money for personal use, it might be reasonable to assess his penalty closer to the high end of the statutory range even though there is only one violation, while Defendant A’s penalty might be toward the low end of the range because the extra violation of failure to register did not really cause additional losses to the investor and the amount of the commissions charged may not necessarily be excessive.  In any event, with this method the range of statutory civil penalties and the defendant’s exposure can reasonably be estimated at the outset of the case and a rational choice can be made by both the defendant and the CFTC as to the appropriate resources to be dedicated to prosecution or defense of the matter.

III.  CONCLUSION

Federal district courts should grant a jury request not only as to liability for violating the CEA but also as to a determination of the amount of civil monetary penalty.  Juries should be instructed to determine the number of violations of the CEA with reference to the categories of conduct regulated by the CEA.  Other factors may be considered as mitigation or aggravation within the statutory range of civil penalty for each violation but should not constitute a basis for counting the number of violations.  Allowing properly instructed juries to determine whether the CEA was violated, how many times the CEA was violated, and the amount of civil penalty per violation, will make results more uniform, serve the deterrent purpose of the Act, and preserve the right to jury in the Seventh Amendment.

[1] CFTC v. King, No. 3:06-CV-1583-M, 2007 WL 1321762, at *5 (N.D. Tx. May 7, 2007).

[2] 7 U.S.C. § 9a, Assessment of Money Penalties, provides certain factors for the CFTC to consider in setting a civil penalty in an administrative proceeding.  Section 9a does not apply to actions in federal district court.  Brenner v. CFTC, 338 F.3d 713, 722 (7th Cir. 2003); CFTC v. Reisinger, No. 11-CV-08567, 2017 WL 4164197, at *19 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 19, 2017); CFTC v. King, No. 3:06-CV-1583-M, 2007 WL 1321762, at *5 (N.D. Tx. May 7, 2007).

[3] See cases cited supra at n.47.

[4] Id., see also CFTC v. McDonnell, 332 F. Supp. 3d 641,727-728 (E.D.N.Y. 2018).

[5] CFTC v. Levy, 541 F.3d 1102 (11th Cir. 2008); CFTC v. Reisinger, No. 11-CV-08567, 2017 WL 4164197 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 19, 2017).

[6] CFTC v. Fluery, 479 Fed. Appx. 940 (11th Cir. 2012); CFTC v. Yorkshire Group, Inc., No. 13-CV-5323 (AMD)(ST), 2016 WL 8256380 (Aug. 19, 2016); CFTC v. Gutterman, No. 12-21047-CIV, 2012 WL 2413082 (Jun. 26, 2012).

[7] CFTC v. Fluery, 479 Fed. Appx. 940 (11th Cir. 2012); CFTC v. Reisinger, No. 11-CV-08567, 2017 WL 4164197 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 19, 2017).

[8] CFTC v. Gramalegui, No. 15-CV-02313-REB-GPG, 2018 WL 4610953 (D. Colo. Sept. 26, 2018); CFTC v. McDonnell, 332 F. Supp. 3d 641 (E.D.N.Y. 2018); CFTC v. King, No. 3:06-CV-1583-M, 2007 WL 1321762 (N.D. Tx. May 7, 2007).

[9] Slusser v. CFTC, 210 F.3d 783, 786-787 (7th Cir. 2000); CFTC v. Reisinger, No. 11-CV-08567, 2017 WL 4164197 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 19, 2017).

[10] CFTC v. Gramalegui, at *28.

[11] CFTC v. Fluery, No. 03–61199–CIV, 2010 WL 3835134 at *2 (Sept. 29, 2010), affirmed 479 Fed. Appx. 940, 944 (11th Cir. 2012).

[12] CFTC v. King, No. 3:06-CV-1583-M, 2007 WL 1321762 (N.D. Tx. May 7, 2007).

[13] CFTC v. Gramalegui, No. 15-CV-02313-REB-GPG, 2018 WL 4610953, at *28 (D. Colo. Sept. 26, 2018).

[14] See Slusser v. CFTC, 210 F.3d 783, 786-787 (7th Cir. 2000) (“A reasonable person in Slusser’s position would have assumed that his maximum exposure was $600,000 and financed his defense accordingly.”)

[15] Id. 

[16] Slusser was reviewing a civil penalty under 7 U.S.C. § 9(3) assessed in an administrative proceeding and not on direct review from the district court assessed under CEA § 13a-1(d), which is the subject of this article.  Nevertheless, the appellate court’s discussion is useful in this context and is cited in later cases determining the civil penalty under § 13a-1(d).

[17] Id. at 786.

[18] Id.

[19] CFTC v. Levy, 541 F.3d 1102 (11th Cir. 2008).

[20] These five customers lost $146,350.  Id. at 1109.

[21] Id. at 1112 n.9.

[22] Id. at 1112 n.7.

[23] Id.

[24] Id. at 1113.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ulmer & Berne LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ulmer & Berne LLP
Contact
more
less

Ulmer & Berne LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.