The Supreme Court - March 2, 2020

Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Contact

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

This morning, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in the following cases:

California v. Texas, No. 19-840; Texas v. California, No. 19-1019: A petition for a writ of certiorari and conditional cross-petition were brought with respect to the Fifth Circuit’s decision that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s (“ACA”) minimum coverage provision, 26 U.S.C. §5000A, was unconstitutional. The petition raises the following three questions: 1) Whether the individual and state plaintiffs in this case have established Article III standing to challenge the minimum coverage provision in Section 5000A(a). 2) Whether reducing the amount specified in Section 5000A(c) to zero rendered the minimum coverage provision unconstitutional. 3) If so, whether the minimum coverage provision is severable from the rest of the ACA. The conditional cross-petition raises two questions: 1) Whether the unconstitutional individual mandate to purchase minimum essential coverage is severable from the remainder of the ACA. 2) Whether the district court properly declared the ACA invalid in its entirety and unenforceable anywhere.

Fish and Wildlife Serv. v. Sierra Club, Inc., No. 19-547: Whether Exemption 5 of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §552(b)(5) (2012), by incorporating the deliberative process privilege, protects against compelled disclosure of a federal agency’s draft documents that were prepared as part of a formal interagency consultation process under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. §1536, and that concerned a proposed agency action that was later modified in the consultation process.

Borden v. United States, No. 19-5410: 1) Does the “use of force” clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act (the “ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i) encompass crimes with a mens rea of mere recklessness? 2) Did the district court violate Mr. Borden’s due process rights when it applied to his sentencing a newer, more punitive interpretation of law than that which was in force at the time of his federal offense, such that his guidelines were enhanced from 77 to 96 months to a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years to life in prison?

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Contact
more
less

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide