The Supreme Court - March 27, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Contact

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Hall v. Hall, No. 16-1150:  Petitioner Elsa Hall and respondent Samuel Hall are siblings litigating against each other in two consolidated cases surrounding the management of their mother’s property and estate.  One of the suits involved claims by Samuel against Elsa in her individual capacity (the “individual case”), and the other involved claims brought by Elsa in her capacity as trustee against Samuel (the “trust case”).  The cases were consolidated under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), and tried together to a jury.  In the individual case, the jury found for Samuel, but the District Court granted Elsa a new trial, thus reopening judgment.  In the trust case, the jury found against Elsa, judgment was entered, and Elsa filed a notice of appeal.  Samuel moved to dismiss the appeal, arguing that judgment was not final because the individual case remained open, and the Third Circuit agreed.  Today, the Court reversed, holding that when one of several consolidated cases is finally decided, a disappointed litigant is free to seek review of that decision in the court of appeals.

The Court's decision is available here.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Contact
more
less

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide