Third Circuit Attempts to Untangle Defamation and False Light Invasion of Privacy

by Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition

CaptureIn Graboff v. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania found that the defendant’s statement was not defamatory but was a false light invasion of privacy (“false light”). The defendant appealed on the grounds that such a ruling was inconsistent as a matter of law. On February 20, 2014, the Third Circuit finally weighed in on the matter.

Pop Quiz: Defamation v. False Light

But before we get to the result, a pop quiz on defamation and false light: Apart from their distinct historical origins (the former derived from ancient common law and the latter from an 1890 article co-authored by Louis Brandeis), what is the practical difference between them?

Need a hint?  Here is a comparison of the elements from a 2008 Florida Supreme Court opinion:


(1) A false statement

(2)   Published by the Defendant

(3) About the Plaintiff

(4) With the requisite intent

(5) That harms the Plaintiff’s reputation in the eyes of an average community member

(6) And that causes actual damages

False Light

(1) A false statement

(2) Published by the Defendant

(3) About the Plaintiff

(4) With the same requisite intent

(5) That is highly offensive to a reasonable person

(6) And that causes actual damages


Pencils down.  The answer to the question is: not much.

A Theoretical Distinction Without a Practical Difference?

In fairness, one can point to a few arguably material distinctions.  First, a defamatory remark need only be published to a single third person, while a false light statement must be communicated to a wider audience.  Second, false light is in theory broader, because a statement could be “highly offensive” but not cause reputational harm.  Third — and this was Brandeis’ justification — while defamation is supposed to redress the reputational harm caused by a statement, false light is supposed to redress the emotional harm caused by the same statement.

But about ten states (including Massachusetts and New York) nevertheless refuse to recognize false light as a separate cause of action, in large part because these theoretical distinctions have little practical use. The Colorado Supreme Court, in Denver Publishing v. Bueno, held that any difference between the two rested on “a too subtle distinction between an individual’s personal sensibilities and his [] reputation.”  The Florida Supreme Court, in Jews for Jesus v. Rapp, declared that false light was so redundant that it was impossible to locate a case where defamation liability had been rejected but false light liability upheld.

So did the Graboff case change all that?  Almost, but not quite.

Graboff v. AAOS

Dr. Steven Graboff is an orthopedist and professional expert witness. In 2009, the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) issued a press release announcing the suspension of Dr. Graboff’s membership on the grounds that he had written an untruthful expert report in a malpractice case. Although everything in the AAOS press release was technically true, it omitted key mitigating facts, including that Dr. Graboff’s expert report was a mere draft that was altered and released without his consent.

In 2010, Dr. Graboff brought suit against the AAOS for both defamation and false light. At trial, the District Court instructed the jury on the elements of the two causes of action, and that a statement could be “false” either because it was literally untrue or because it implied an untrue meaning. The jury was then asked to answer the following interrogatories:

1. Did the AAOS make a false statement?

2. Did the AAOS portray Dr. Graboff in a false light?

The jury answered “no” on question one but “yes” on question two. So the District Court dismissed Dr. Graboff’s defamation claim and issued judgment in favor of Dr. Graboff on his false light claim. But on appeal, AAOS argued that this decision was hopelessly confused. Because both defamation and false light require the element of falsity, the jury’s answer to question one should have ended the matter and foreclosed both causes of action.

The Third Circuit agreed that the verdict was discombobulated, but disagreed as to why. According to the Third Circuit, the jury probably confused false light with implied falsity. The jury meant to find that the AAOS press release was literally true but impliedly false, and therefore surely meant to find that AAOS was liable for both defamation and false light on a theory of implied falsity. AAOS requested that the matter be remanded just to make sure, but the Third Circuit refused, satisfied that it had cleared everything up and no harm was done.

So, we still don’t have a substantive appellate decision in which defamation is rejected but false light survives. We do, however, have more evidence that the distinction between the two torts is confusing even for lawyers and judges. Imagine how the jury must have felt. 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.