This offer expires in 30 days! No automatic extensions says high court.

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
Contact

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP

The time to respond to a proposal for settlement can no longer be tolled by filing a motion to enlarge the time to respond, says the Florida Supreme Court in Koppel v. Ochoa, No. SC16-1474 (Fla. May 17, 2018), disapproved the tolling rule of Goldy v. Corbett Cranes Services, Inc., 692 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).  The new rule? The filing of a motion under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.090 to enlarge the time to accept a proposal for settlement does not automatically toll the 30-day deadline for accepting the proposal until the motion is decided.

Practice tip: The offeree has 30 days to accept the offer after which, unless that time is extended by stipulation or court order, that offer is deemed rejected – there are no automatic extensions. Calendar carefully.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP

Written by:

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide