Tighter Requirements and a New Penalty for Owners of Vacant or Abandoned Storefronts in San Francisco

Pillsbury - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law
Contact

Pillsbury - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law

Ordinance 52-19 became effective in April 2019 and expands upon existing San Francisco Building Code registration requirements for “Vacant or Abandoned” “Commercial Storefronts.”

A storefront becomes “Vacant or Abandoned” once it has been unoccupied for 30 days (among other earlier triggers for blighted or unsecured storefronts). A “Commercial Storefront” is broadly defined as “any area within a building that may be individually leased or rented for any purpose other than Residential Use as defined in Planning Code.” (See § 103.A.5.1 of the San Francisco Building Code.) So, a building that is 97% leased could still contain a Vacant or Abandoned Commercial Storefront, which would technically require registration under the Building Code.

As amended by Ordinance 52-19, the Building Code imposes the following requirements on San Francisco property owners:

1. An owner is required to register a Commercial Storefront within 30 days of it becoming Vacant or Abandoned (i.e., usually 60 days from the date that the applicable portion of the building becomes unoccupied). (See § 103A.5.2.)

  • The Board of Supervisors eliminated a key exemption for Vacant Commercial Storefronts that are “actively being offered for sales, lease or rent.”
  • Exemptions remain for Vacant Commercial Storefronts that have been issued permits for repair, rehabilitation or construction, or where an owner or lessee is actively pursuing a required permit.

2. A property owner must pay an annual registration fee ($711) at the time of registration. (See § 103A.5.2.)

  • Previously, the fee was due 270 days after the Commercial Storefront became Vacant or Abandoned.

3. After registering a Vacant or Abandoned Commercial Storefront, a property owner is also required to hire a licensed professional each year (at the owner’s cost) to certify that the Commercial Storefront meets code requirements. (See § 103A.5.3.)

  • Previously, the Department of Building Inspection (DBI) would conduct an inspection at the owner’s cost.

4. If a property owner fails to register with DBI and receives a Notice of Violation, DBI may impose a new penalty equal to 4x the annual registration fee ($2,844). (See § 110A.)

  • Notably, this penalty is only imposed once DBI sends an owner a NOV.

It is worth noting that DBI is relying on property owners to self-report their own non-compliance, unless DBI either investigates the property or receives a complaint about the property.

Relatedly (but not to be confused with Ordinance 52-19), Supervisor Aaron Peskin has proposed leveling $250 per day against storefronts that remain empty for more than six months. Such a tax would need to be placed on the ballot by the Board of Supervisors, where it would need to pass by a two-thirds vote to become law.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Pillsbury - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law

Written by:

Pillsbury - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Pillsbury - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide