Timing or permanent? The Tax Court faces this question in its denial of an IRS-proposed section 481(a) adjustment

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Contact

In Hyatt Hotels Corp. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2023-122, the Tax Court determined a taxpayer’s treatment of income and expenses related to its customer loyalty program did not implicate timing and, therefore, was not a method of accounting. Because the taxpayer’s existing tax treatment was not a method of accounting, the Commissioner could not invoke section 481(a) to require adjustments related to closed tax years, which adjustments gave rise to the lion’s share of the proposed deficiencies. This Alert discusses the court’s opinion in Hyatt as it relates to the method of accounting issue, and the implications of the court’s holding.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Contact
more
less

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide