Top 5 Patent Red Flags in Life Sciences Due Diligence

by JD Supra Perspectives

Like a house inspection for real estate, patent due diligence is an investor’s opportunity to look under the hood of a life science company’s intellectual property (IP) before making an investment. Since IP represents 75 to 90% of the value of life science transactions, due diligence is a critical component of the valuation process. IP is a present indicator of the future value of a life science company — especially when the time to market for a drug averages about ten years.

A comprehensive patent due diligence analysis looks beyond rosy forecasts, and considers whether the patent claims will keep out the competition (claim scope). The claim scope, in turn, may depend on the back and forth between the patent Applicant and the patent Examiner at the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO).

IP is a present indicator of the future value of a life science company...

In the startup space, a significant portion of the company’s patent portfolio may consist of active or pending patent applications at the USPTO rather than issued patents. The company may also be actively filing new applications.

Since the patents have not issued, there is more uncertainty regarding the value of any patents that eventually issue. Pending patents impart value, but cannot be used to exclude competition until they issue.

Without issued patent claims to review, how can you determine the value of a pending patent application?

Below are the top 5 red flags to look for when evaluating pending patent applications:

1. Length of Prosecution

Brevity is the soul of wit, and patent prosecution. A lengthy prosecution could indicate limitations on claim scope and a shortened patent term.

Patent prosecution is a “conversation” between Applicant and the patent Examiner. Typically, the Examiner issues an office action in response to a patent filing and rejects the claims for both substantive and procedural reasons (e.g., prior art, insufficient disclosure, failure to comply with drawing rules). The Applicant responds by amending the claims, or making counter arguments.

Brevity is the soul of wit, and patent prosecution.

This conversation creates the “Patent Prosecution History” (PPH). When you sue a competitor, the court will interpret the meaning and scope of the patent claims and consult the PPH to see if the Applicant made any statement which narrows the scope of the claim.

For example, the Applicant may have argued that the dosage range of 0.5 to 1.0 μg/ml per recited in its claim to treating prostate cancer with drug X cannot be any higher without causing negative side effects in an effort to avoid a prior publication disclosing a dose of 1.1 μg/ml. Now, the Applicant is “estopped” from arguing that a competitor’s use of 1.1 μg/ml is “equivalent” to its claims because of its prior argument to the contrary, and the scope of the claim would be narrowed. A lengthy patent prosecution could increase the risk of admissions made during the patent prosecution, that could be used to narrow the interpretation of a patent claim.

In addition, the longer the prosecution, the shorter the patent term. Prior to June 8, 1995, there was not a significant downside to extending the number of rounds since the term of a US Patent was 17 years from the date of issuance. However, since 1996, the term of a US Patent is 20 years from the date of filing. From the moment an application is filed, the clock is ticking for an application, and any subsequent application claiming priority to the original application.

2. Examiner and Art Unit Statistics

Although the USPTO takes a number of steps to ensure uniformity of policies and procedures, the Patent Examiner assigned to a case and the Art Unit where the Examiner resides may have a great deal of influence on the rejections applied and likelihood of success in obtaining a valuable, issued patent.

The USPTO examines applications from numerous scientific disciplines. In order to distribute applications to Examiners best suited to examine them, the USPTO divides Examiners into “Technology Centers” which are, in turn, broken down into “Art Units” using a comprehensive classification system. Although the USPTO develops rules and guidance issued to the office as a whole, Art Units develop their own approaches to patent examination and may issue certain rejections more frequently than others and may be more or less receptive to certain arguments. Analyzing statistics regarding the Art Unit and/or Examiner handling an application, may indicate how difficult it will be to obtain meaningful patent protection and the time frame for patent issuance.

Data regarding the percentage of applications issued by an Art Unit and Examiner at various stages during patent prosecution may indicate the likelihood of success depending on the stage of patent prosecution (e.g., first office action, final office action, after final, and appeal). These statistics can be used to predict outcomes based on the specific stage a given application is at with the Examiner.

Data regarding the percentage of applications issued by an Art Unit and Examiner at various stages during patent prosecution may indicate the likelihood of success depending on the stage of patent prosecution (e.g., first office action, final office action, after final, and appeal).

These statistics can be used to predict outcomes based on the specific stage a given application is at with the Examiner. A statistical “snapshot” of individual applications or a portfolio as a whole provides quick and inexpensive feedback before committing to a larger scale (and more expensive) complete IP due diligence.

It is important to recognize that each case is unique, and such statistics are not a substitute for substantive analysis of the merits. However, knowing whether an Examiner is likely to respond to certain arguments at different stages of prosecution is valuable for predicting outcomes and developing strategies to overcome rejections.

3. Frequency and Types of Rejections

It is common to receive certain types of rejections depending on the technology area being examined. Each rejection type could indicate the prosecution challenges for a given application or portfolio.

For example, it is common to receive written description and enablement rejections under 35 USC Section 112, 1st paragraph for biotechnology inventions. Often biotechnology patent applications are filed before complete data regarding the invention is available to obtain priority and to avoid creating prior art that could preclude obtaining any patent protection.

Each rejection type could indicate the prosecution challenges for a given application or portfolio.

The Examiner may believe that the Applicant has not shown adequate possession of the invention at time the patent application is filed or that the Applicant has not adequately shown how to make and use the invention in the application. Determining the number of such rejections may indicate that the Applicant’s patent specification is not complete enough to support the desired claims.

Rejections based on lack of patentable subject matter are now common in both life sciences and computer software technology. Understanding the basis for a patentable subject matter rejection is very useful in evaluating the patent application, and asking pertinent questions of the target company.

4. Comparison to Competitors

How does the investment prospect compare to the competition? Statistics regarding the above parameters can be compared to competitors in the industry. For example, how does your investment prospect’s patent portfolio compare to its competition in front of the same Examiner or in the same Art Unit? If the investment prospect is facing longer prosecution timelines or more difficult rejections, there may be underlying issues with the patent prosecution strategy that can be explored with counsel.

5. Responsiveness to Questions

The tools identified above are useful for developing an initial set of questions for the investment prospect and their patent counsel. Their ability to answer questions related to the above, and brainstorm regarding strategies to overcome challenges is a good indicator of how successful they will be in meeting the challenges of patent prosecution.

There are several important caveats to using these red flags. Patent prosecution is a complex process, and actions are taken (or not taken) for a variety of legal, business, and scientific reasons. There may be a perfectly reasonable explanations for a lengthy patent prosecution, disparities with respect to the average case for a given Art Unit or Examiner, or receiving certain types of rejections. Thus, the “red flags” should be used as a starting, not ending, point in the patent due diligence process.

However, the presence of several red flags may be an early sign that something is awry and are a powerful tool to have at the initial stage of due diligence.


[Jeremy A. Cubert is a partner at VLP Law Group and is a member of the firm’s Intellectual Property practice group. He writes about strategies to simplify the way inventors and investors evaluate and protect biotechnology and pharmaceutical inventions.]

Written by:

JD Supra Perspectives

JD Supra Perspectives on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.