Top franchise matters of 2014

by DLA Piper
Contact

DLA Piper IPT partners Barry Heller, John Verhey and John Hughes recently conducted a webinar reviewing 2014’s top franchise decisions. Three significant 2014 matters are summarized below.

1.  In Patterson v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC,1 the California Supreme Court provided welcome clarity regarding the controls a franchisor can safely exercise without being held vicariously liable for the torts of its franchisees’ employees. In a 4-3 decision, the court examined the line between a franchisor’s business system and the independent business operated by the franchisee and held a franchisor must exhibit the traditionally understood characteristics of an “employer” to be held vicariously liable for the acts of one franchisee employee against another. 

The case involved a sexual harassment claim filed by a franchisee employee against the franchisee, another franchisee employee (who allegedly committed the sexual harassment), as well as the franchisor, Domino’s. After considering extensive evidence, the court concluded Domino’s had not “retained or assumed the traditional right of general control an ‘employer’ or ‘principal’ has over factors such as hiring, direction, supervision, discipline, discharge, and relevant day-to-day aspects of the workplace behavior of the franchisee’s employees.” The court held there was no basis to find liability against Domino’s on vicarious liability grounds.

While the case is a victory for franchisors, particularly because it recognizes key aspects of the franchise relationship, it does not mean franchisors are immune from vicarious liability claims. In fact, the court warned its conclusion did not mean franchisors could never be held accountable for sexual harassment at a franchised location, nor that they could escape liability by declining to establish a sexual harassment policy.

2. In Orozco v. Plackis,2 the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit considered whether Craig Plackis, owner of a franchised restaurant chain, was responsible for a franchisee’s alleged failures to pay one of its employees overtime and minimum wage as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act. Applying the economic reality test, the Fifth Circuit reversed the lower court’s denial of Plackis’ motion for judgment as a matter of law, holding there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude Plackis was the plaintiff’s employer.

Although the franchise agreement demonstrated Plackis had a certain degree of control over the franchised location, the Fifth Circuit determined this was insufficient to support the jury verdict. The Fifth Circuit considered the language in the franchise agreement requiring the franchisee to follow “policies and procedures promulgated by the franchisor for ‘selection, supervision, or training of personnel’” to be an “innocuous statement” that did not suggest Plackis hired or fired employees, supervised or controlled employee work schedules or employment conditions, or determined the plaintiff’s rate and method of payment.

Given the recent climate surrounding joint employer issues, this decision is a relief for franchisors. However, the Fifth Circuit warned that its decision “did not suggest that franchisors can never qualify as the FLSA employer for a franchisee’s employees.”

3. Perhaps the most significant development in 2014 was the National Labor Relations Board decision to issue complaints against McDonald’s asserting McDonald’s is a joint employer, along with its franchisees, of the franchisees’ employees.

In June 2014, in an amicus brief in a pending case, the NLRB’s General Counsel urged the NLRB to “abandon its existing joint-employer standard” and replace it with a new joint employer standard, pursuant to which “an entity could be a joint employer if it exercised direct or indirect control over working conditions, had the unexercised potential to control working conditions, or where ‘industrial realities’ otherwise made it essential to meaningful collective bargaining.”

In December 2014, the NLRB General Counsel issued 13 complaints, involving 78 unfair labor practice charges, against McDonald’s franchisees and their franchisor, McDonald’s USA, LLC, as joint employers. While the complaints fail to specify McDonald’s USA, LLC’s involvement in the alleged unlawful conduct, the allegations are framed in such a way that by merely “possessing” control – as compared to exercising control – over a franchisee’s labor relations policies, a franchisor is a joint employer.

If the view of the NLRB were to be adopted, and possessing control were enough, it would upset years of authority to the contrary and create major problems for franchisors.

60 Cal. 4th 474 (Cal. Sup. Ct. 2014).

757 F.3d 445 (5th Cir. 2014).

 

Written by:

DLA Piper
Contact
more
less

DLA Piper on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.