Transactions: 2012 AIPN Model International Joint Operating Agreement – A New Industry Standard? By Jennifer Josefson

by King & Spalding

After a 10-year reign, and having become the widely-accepted international standard, the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators’ (AIPN) 2002 International Operating Agreement, has been revised and in February 2012 AIPN published the 4th version of its model Joint Operating Agreement (JOA) (the “2012 JOA”).

The drafting committee for the 2012 JOA, made up of over 180 international negotiators representing various spheres of industry interest, began its work in December 2007 and took over four years to finalize the 2012 JOA. Their task was to update the model form to current-day realities of international oil & gas operations and to revise the form to make it more fluidly coherent with other AIPN model forms that may be used in conjunction with the JOA.

As the 2012 JOA drafting committee was working on the revisions, the “current-day realities” of international oil & gas projects encountered several significant events that are redefining the industry’s approach to doing business, including the 2008 meltdown of the financial markets, the 2010 Macondo blowout and the 2010 introduction of the UK Bribery Act. The drafting committee wrestled with these new realities and endeavored to adapt the model JOA in a way that would address the risks inherent in the changing global industry but still reflect current international practice.

The revisions to the 2012 JOA include changes and additions to provisions related to (i) Operator rights and duties, (ii) limitations on Operator liability, (iii) removal and replacement of Operators, (iv) revisions to Work Programs, Budgets, and AFEs, (v) decommissioning, (vi) the consequences of Exclusive Operations, (vii) default, (viii) conflicts of interest, and (ix) Bribery compliance. New Guidance Notes were also drafted that, in addition to explanatory commentary, provide sample drafting for certain provisions that did not make it into the text of the 2012 JOA.

We have briefly highlighted below some of the most significant new issues addressed and revisions made in the 2012 JOA.

Operator Liability

In the post-Macondo world, the drafting committee spent many hours debating the level of liability that should be confirmed on the Operator. Starting from the basic premise of AIPN’s model JOAs - that the Operator should neither profit nor suffer loss in carrying out its duties as operator, the Operator’s losses and profits from the joint operations are generally limited to the proportion of its participating interest in the JOA. A key argument in support of this position being that, if the Operator is not receiving a greater benefit from being named the operator, then it should also not be taking on greater risk due to accepting this role. This fundamental premise is only circumvented through the model JOA’s optional clause providing for increased liability of the Operator in the case of “Gross Negligence / Willful Misconduct” of the Operator’s “Senior Supervisory Personnel”; however, such increased liability expressly does not apply to consequential or environmental loss.

Ultimately, the final version of the 2012 JOA does not include extreme changes to the provisions related to the liability of the Operator, and in many cases the changes are only minor revisions, many of a stylistic nature. Nevertheless, it is important to become familiar with the changes and particularly the new options with respect to the Operator’s obligations provided in the 2012 JOA, including, among other things, the anti-bribery provisions, triggers for automatic removal of the Operator, expanded obligations for the Operator to provide information prior to submission to the government authorities, and the Operator’s right to assign obligations to affiliates.


The revisions in Article 8 of the 2012 JOA (Default) introduce a number of new options and alternatives for addressing default situations. Following the Macondo incident, the 2012 JOA drafting committee clarified the triggers of the default event to ensure that a party’s failure to pay an indemnity obligation would create an event of default for such party.

A new alternative has been introduced allowing the negotiating parties in the draft to elect to allow the “Defaulting Party” to transfer its Participating Interest while it is in default as long as it cures its default before or at closing of the transfer. The 2002 JOA only provided that the Defaulting Party could transfer its Participating Interest to a “non-defaulting Party” while the Defaulting Party remained in default.

In addition to the enforcement options provided to the non-defaulting Parties pursuant to the 2002 JOA (i.e., forfeiture, buy-out, foreclosure on security/mortgage), the 2012 JOA also introduces the concept of a “Withering Option”, by which the non-defaulting Parties have the right with respect to a default under an approved Development Plan, to require the Defaulting Party to sell and assign the portion of its Participation Interest in the respective Exploitation Area to the non-defaulting Parties, as calculated pursuant to the withering formula contained in the 2012 JOA. This option permits the non-defaulting Parties to acquire less than all of the obligations of the Defaulting Party and at the same time allows the Defaulting Party to remain in the project with a lesser participating interest.


The 2012 JOA expands upon the decommissioning security options contained in the 2002 JOA. A new optional provision requires the Operator to prepare and provide the non-operators with a draft decommissioning work program and budget at the time of delivering the draft Development Plan.

In addition, a new exhibit, Exhibit E – Decommissioning Plan, has been added to the 2012 JOA that envisages the creation of a trust fund to which the Parties must either contribute at such times that the Operator makes a Trust Fund Cash Call or provide security instead of payment of such cash calls.

Bribery Protections

With the introduction of the UK Bribery Act and the continued strict enforcement of the US’s FCPA, the drafting committee expanded the anti-bribery, business ethics provisions of the 2012 JOA. The final version of the 2012 JOA provides an option to expand the definition of “Anti-Bribery Laws and Obligations” to include an alternative provision that would make all Parties ensure compliance of terms of the UK Bribery Act in the case of potential indirect application of the law. This expansion, if the definition option and the additional warranty language option are selected, results in the parties providing a warranty as to their past compliance and a covenant as to their future compliance with the “Anti-Bribery Laws and Obligations”, which, in such case, would include, among other things, compliance with the provisions of the UK Bribery Act.

The 2012 JOA also goes further to require each party to notify the other parties of any investigations or proceedings related to alleged violations of “Anti-Bribery Laws and Obligations” and to provide additional information with respect to such notice if requested by another party. Each party is also required to indemnify the other parties from all losses “related to the events underlying” a party’s admission of violations of the Anti-Bribery Laws and Obligations or a final adjudication against such party (or its affiliates or representatives) with respect to a violation of the Anti-Bribery Laws and Obligations.

The parties may also elect to include a provision requiring a party to provide written certification of their compliance with the “Anti-Bribery Laws and Obligations” upon the request of another party.

National Oil Company (NOC) Financial Carry

While not included in the text of the 2012 JOA, the Guidance Notes for the 2012 JOA provide suggested text for the expansion of the 2012 JOA traditional provisions with respect to the participation of a “Government Oil & Gas Company” or a NOC. The Guidance Notes provide a brief discussion and potential language for a NOC carry provision that could be included in the 2012 JOA or in a separate carry agreement. The suggested language envisages a scenario in which the non-NOC participants would finance certain work, on behalf of the NOC, with repayment for such carry (financing) being made out of a portion of the NOC’s share of Cost Hydrocarbons.

Integrated Projects Teams

The Guidance Notes for the 2012 JOA also provide for suggested language for the introduction of an “Integrated Project Team”. An Integrated Project Team (or IPT) is made of representatives of all of the parties (or all the parties holding a participation interest higher than a certain determined threshold). The scope of the IPT member’s work (e.g., preparation of the Development Plan) is to be specifically defined in the agreement.

Integrated Project Teams have been discussed and debated over the years (even in past revisions of the AIPN JOA). They are seen as a tool for the non-operating parties to have the ability to participate actively in the project’s operations and decision-making. While the 2012 JOA drafting committee and AIPN Board ultimately decided that IPTs are not recognized standard industry practice, IPTs did evoke enough discussion and interest from the drafters to introduce the concept and suggested text in the Guidance Notes.

Jennifer A. Josefson
+7 495 797 3788

View Profile »


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

King & Spalding

King & Spalding on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.