U.S. Supreme Court Issues Decision Upholding DACA

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP
Contact

On June 18, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision delivered by Chief Justice John G. Roberts, ruled that the administration was barred from terminating the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

This decision preserves protections for hundreds of thousands of young unauthorized immigrants currently present in the United States and appears to allow new DACA applications, which had been suspended during litigation. The Court summarized the core criteria for DACA eligibility, which allowed for certain unauthorized aliens who entered the United States as children to apply for a two-year forbearance of removal and further permitted work authorization and various federal benefits for this class of individuals, which encompassed approximately 700,000 people who have, since 2012, availed themselves of these benefits.

In 2017, Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a letter to the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, advising her that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) should rescind DACA. Winding its way through the courts to the U.S. Supreme Court, the final decision centered on the appeals of three district courts and the authority of DHS to accept governmental claims that class-based relief should come only from Congress and not through executive non-enforcement. Further, among other factors, the decision highlighted the importance of projecting a message that immigration laws would be enforced against all classes and categories of aliens.

The Court’s decision focuses on the procedural issues and the authority of DHS to issue rules and regulations and not on the substance of the regulation itself. It is possible that the current administration may embark on a new rule-making process to enforce its contention that the DACA Presidential Order of 2012 and ensuing regulations issued by the DHS are contrary to the administration’s interpretation of current U.S. immigration rules.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP
Contact
more
less

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.