UNMASKING BLOGGERS: Hedge Fund’s Bid To Unveil Blogger’s Identity Highlights First Amendment, Trade Secrets Clash

by Orrick - Trade Secrets Group

https://jdsupra-html-images.s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/0bda1fa1-eff0-4119-8da2-5cd2d52228f9-27Mar2014-200x150.jpgAmerica’s reverence for anonymous speech is as old as the republic itself, tracing its roots to Thomas Payne’s pamphlet “Common Sense” and the Federalist Papers.  But the right to speak namelessly has limits, and hedge fund billionaire David Einhorn recently demanded that a court unmask a blogger who anonymously disclosed confidential investment information.

Early last month, Greenlight Capital, Inc., Einhorn’s hedge fund, filed suit in New York state court against Seeking Alpha, Inc., a popular stock market blogging website.  In the suit, Greenlight asked the court to order Seeking Alpha to identify a blogger who anonymously exposed Greenlight’s stake in Micron Technology before Greenlight revealed it.

According to the “Petition for Pre-Action Disclosure,” Greenlight began acquiring a stake in Micron on July 2, 2013.  On the morning of November 14, 2013, a blogger who went by the handle “Valuable Insights” posted to Seeking Alpha: “Expect one mega hedge fund rock star to show up as [Micron] holder today, not Ackman, Icahn or Loeb.”  “Valuable Insights” kept hinting at the “rock star’s” identity until someone guessed Einhorn, and then the blogger confirmed, “you heard it here first.”

Greenlight claimed that on that November morning, “the only persons who lawfully possessed information regarding Greenlight’s position in Micron were persons with a contractual, fiduciary, or other duty to maintain the confidentiality of Greenlight’s position.”  Greenlight argued that “Valuable Insights” therefore: (1) wrongfully disclosed and misappropriated Greenlight’s valuable trade secrets, (2) breached confidentiality obligations owed to Greenlight, and/or (3) aided and abetted the breach of such confidentiality obligations.

Greenlight claimed that it continued to build its position in Micron from November 14 until November 19, and then announced its position in Micron on November 21.  Greenlight claimed that it was damaged by the “Valuable Insights” post because “the trading price for Micron’s shares rose immediately after Valuable Insight’s posting.”

To trade secrets owners, it may seem self-evident that the confidentiality concerns at issue here should trump the First Amendment right of anonymous speech.  Laws prohibiting trade secret misappropriation restrict free speech by their very nature.  The simple fact that a blogger uses a pseudonym to distribute such trade secrets should not change the operation of those laws.

But courts have emphasized the importance of anonymous online speech in a variety of contexts where it might have seemed equally self-evident to some that the speaker should be identified.

The Delaware Supreme Court in Doe v. Cahill in 2005, in a first for a state’s highest court, addressed the issue of anonymous online speech.  In that case, the defendants had posted allegedly defamatory statements on a newspaper blog.  A city councilman and his wife sued four John Doe defendants, asserting defamation and invasion of privacy claims, and tried to compel the disclosure of the defendants’ identities.  The court expressed deep misgivings that permitting the identification would “chill potential posters from exercising their First Amendment right to speak anonymously.  The possibility of losing anonymity in a future lawsuit could intimidate anonymous posters into self-censoring their comments or simply not commenting at all.”  The court reversed the lower court’s order to unmask the defendants’ identities.

More recently, a federal judge refused to unveil the identity of a blogger accused of disclosing trade secrets—even though the blogger had admitted to doing so.  In Art of Living Foundation v. Does 1-10, Judge Lucy Koh of the Northern District of California found that a blogger known only as “Skywalker” had “raised a reasonable inference that unveiling his identity will both subject him to harm and chill others from engaging in protected speech.”  Koh, quoting the Supreme Court in McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, fretted that unmasking “Skywalker” would ultimately diminish free speech:  “As the Supreme Court has explained, ‘an advocate may believe her ideas will be more persuasive if her readers are unaware of her identity.  Anonymity thereby provides a way for a writer who may be personally unpopular to ensure that readers will not prejudge her message simply because they do not like its proponent.’”

And there may be even more to the Greenlight case than meets the eye.  A review by Trade Secrets Watch of Micron’s stock price between November 11, 2013 and November 21, 2013 reveals that the price rose fairly consistently from November 11 through November 15, and then dropped until November 20.  On November 21, the stock price rose.  This pattern is almost identical to the performance of the S&P 500 during that same time period.  Contrary to Greenlight’s contentions, the November 14 blog post appears to have had no effect on Micron’s stock price.  For that reason, Judge Carol R. Edmead might have been inclined to take a particularly close look at Einhorn’s true motives here.  Was it to intimidate bloggers into not publishing leaks?

We may never know.  On March 24, without explanation, Greenlight filed a “Notice of Discontinuance,” effectively ending the case.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick - Trade Secrets Group | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Orrick - Trade Secrets Group

Orrick - Trade Secrets Group on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.