US Supreme Court Decision Invites Scrutiny of Legislatively Imposed Impact Fees

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact

The unanimous opinion holds that development impact fees established through the legislative process are subject to constitutional scrutiny as potential regulatory takings.

The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution allows the government to take private property for a public purpose so long as it provides “just compensation” to the property owner. The Takings Clause coexists with state and local governments’ police power to regulate land use. Past Takings Clause jurisprudence recognizes that a land use regulation “reasonably necessary to the effectuation of a substantial government purpose” is not a taking unless it diminishes too much of the property’s value or frustrates the owner’s investment-backed expectations.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact
more
less

Latham & Watkins LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide