US Supreme Court hears trust nexus oral arguments

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

On April 16, 2019, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments for North Carolina Department of Revenue v. Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust, which asks whether the Due Process Clause prohibits states from taxing trusts based on a discretionary beneficiary’s in-state residency.1 The Justices’ questioning addressed the Due Process Clause analysis, which examines the “fundamental fairness” of an action, largely focusing on whether North Carolina should be allowed to tax the trust based on connections with its beneficiaries and, if so, how to determine the amount of undistributed income that it could constitutionally tax. The analysis keyed off discussions of whether the beneficiary was a “part” of the trust such that the benefits the beneficiary received from the state were in essence benefits received by the trust.

The case is on appeal from the North Carolina Supreme Court, which held that North Carolina could not tax the undistributed income of a New York trust based solely on the fact that a discretionary beneficiary of the trust was domiciled in North Carolina.2


In 1992, Joseph Lee Rice III created the Joseph Lee Rice III Family 1992 Trust (the “Family Trust”) for the benefit of his children. The Family Trust was governed by New York law, administered in New York, and the trustee at all times was a resident of and domiciled in Connecticut. No beneficiary of the Family Trust resided in North Carolina until 1997 when Kimberley Rice Kaestner, a primary beneficiary of the Family Trust, moved to North Carolina.

In 2002, the Family Trust was divided into three separate trusts – one for each of Mr. Rice’s three children. The plaintiff in the case is the separate trust established for the benefit of Kimberley Rice Kaestner and her children (the “Trust”), all of whom lived and were domiciled in North Carolina during the tax years at issue. The assets in the Trust were financial investments including equities, mutual funds, and investments in partnerships managed by a custodian who was located in Massachusetts. Distributions from the Trust were within the trustee’s sole discretion. Indeed, the Trust made no distributions to North Carolina resident beneficiaries during the tax years at issue. The Trust filed North Carolina income tax returns for the 2005 through 2008 tax years, and North Carolina imposed income taxes on the Trust’s undistributed income. The Trust filed for a refund. The Department denied the refund claims.

The North Carolina Supreme Court, the North Carolina Court of Appeals, and the trial court all held that the Trust did not have sufficient nexus with North Carolina for income tax purposes. The North Carolina Supreme Court, echoing the lower courts’ reasoning, held that the tax imposed on a trust violates the Due Process Clause if the trust’s only connection with the state is the presence in the state of a beneficiary.3 The North Carolina Supreme Court relied heavily on Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, stating that the Due Process Clause requires “some minimum connection” between the state and the Trust in order for the state to tax the Trust.4 The minimum connection exists when “the taxed entity ‘purposefully avails itself of the benefits of an economic market’ in the taxing state ‘even if it has no physical presence in the State.’”5

The North Carolina Supreme Court emphasized that a trust is a separate and distinct entity from its beneficiaries, and a trust’s connections with the state – as distinguished from the beneficiaries’ connections -- are the connections integral to determining whether the tax on the Trust violates due process.6 The state argued that the beneficiary’s interest in the Trust’s income is an “equitable interest” protected by North Carolina and therefore subject to taxation in the state. The court found this unpersuasive, reasoning that the beneficiary’s residency in the state cannot be viewed as the Trust conducting purposeful activities in the state because the Trust and its beneficiaries are separate legal entities.7 Because the Trust did not purposefully avail itself of the protections and benefits of North Carolina law, the court held that the imposition of the North Carolina tax on the Trust’s accumulated income violates the Due Process Clause as applied to the Trust.8

The Briefs

The Department’s briefs argued, among other things, that holding for the Trust would be inconsistent with the Court’s decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.9 The Department argued that the Due Process Clause minimum-connection analysis centers on “fundamental fairness” and that it is “fundamentally fair” for North Carolina to tax the Trust’s undistributed income because the state gave the Trust certain benefits and protections for which a state may tax. The Department reasoned that the Trust “purposely availed itself of North Carolina” because the beneficiaries received certain “benefits and protections from the state,” which helped the Trust conserve its income.

The Trust’s brief argued that for income tax purposes the only states that the Trust had nexus with are the states where the Trust is administered and where the trustee resides. The Trust reasoned that the beneficiary’s contacts with a state were therefore insufficient to establish nexus under the Due Process Clause. In its reply brief, the Department asserted that the beneficiary, and not the Trust, is the actual owner of the trust’s undistributed income. As such, the Department argued that the beneficiary’s nexus with North Carolina should be used to determine whether the Trust has nexus with the State.

Several amicus briefs were filed in Kaestner from law professors, trade organizations, state bar associations, and several states, many supporting the Trust. Several briefs explained that a discretionary beneficiary cannot create nexus for a trust for income tax purposes because the beneficiary has no ownership or control over the trust’s property. In addition, the benefits a beneficiary receives from a state are not passed through from the beneficiary to the trust. In the case of a discretionary beneficiary, the trustee is under no obligation to distribute any proceeds from the trust. As such, any benefits received by a beneficiary do not reduce the trust’s distribution obligation. Further, the settlor, trust, trustee, and beneficiaries are all separate legal entities with distinct legal obligations. The Department’s position disregards well-settled law that a trust and a beneficiary are separate and distinct, the briefs argue.

Possibly the most interesting and ironic amicus brief filed in support of the Trust came from a group of states that included South Dakota, the plaintiff in Wayfair. The brief seeks to distinguish Kaestner from Wayfair by asserting that North Carolina did not contribute to the Trust’s creation of wealth. The filers argue that “Wayfair sustained South Dakota’s sales tax because South Dakota had created a market in which Wayfair could operate and profit; North Carolina’s laws and markets contribute nothing to the Kaestner Trust’s generation of income.”10

The briefs supporting North Carolina argued that substance over form was central to the Due Process Clause analysis and that holding for the Trust would disregard a trust’s significant in-state contacts through its beneficiaries. Likewise, prohibiting taxation infringes on a state’s sovereignty.

Oral Arguments

The Department argued that it is “fundamentally fair” for North Carolina to tax the Trust’s accumulated wealth because the beneficiary is the “true owner” of the Trust’s accumulated wealth and therefore the beneficiary should be taxed for the benefits it receives from the State. Some of the Justices appeared to struggle with the Department’s position in part because of the legal distinctions and separation between the Trust and the beneficiary. Justice Ginsberg asked the Department whether North Carolina “want[s] to use the beneficiary’s connection with North Carolina to impose a tax on the trust that doesn’t have a connection [to North Carolina]?” Justice Roberts also appeared to struggle with the Department’s position and asked on more than one occasion which states had the “primary claim on the taxation of this [accumulated] income?” The Department tried to focus the Court on the benefits the beneficiary received from North Carolina as a benefit received by the Trust.

Much of the questioning of the Department focused on whether the beneficiary was certain to get distributions, and some Justices were troubled that the Trust beneficiary did not receive any of the accumulated wealth during the years at issue and the amount the beneficiary would actually receive in future years was uncertain. Justice Breyer noted that the state had the power to tax an in-state beneficiary on actual distributions from a trust. Before the Trust’s income is distributed, there is no guarantee that the beneficiary will ever receive this income. Taxing in those circumstances, Justice Breyer stated, “Now there’s something wrong with that.” Justice Breyer questioned this point further, pointing out that even if the future distribution were assured it would still be difficult to determine what amount should be taxed because there is a timing issue—the beneficiary would not receive the income until a later year, therefore, the income in the present year should be discounted. The Department responded, arguing that it was “fundamentally fair” for the state to tax the in-state beneficiary’s current pro rata share because the beneficiary was part of the Trust and was therefore receiving benefits presently, even though the pro rata share could be more or less than what is eventually distributed to the beneficiary. The Department also tried to re-direct the Court to the question of whether the state has jurisdiction to tax at all and leave for another day the amount that the state could tax.

The Trust likewise focused its fundamental fairness argument on who owned the Trust property. The Trust argued that trust law makes clear that the trustee is the owner of the Trust. Further, the beneficiary does not have a vested interest in the Trust’s accumulated income because where the beneficiary is contingent and distributions are discretionary, there is no guarantee that the beneficiary will receive any of the Trust’s accumulated wealth. It would not be fundamentally fair to attribute the beneficiary’s presence to the Trust. Further, the Trust noted that the state received compensation for the benefits the beneficiary received through income tax imposed on the beneficiary. The Justices asked several questions regarding which states had the authority to tax the Trust’s accumulated income and why. The Trust explained that the authority to tax turned on legal protections afforded to the Trust or trustee. The Trust acknowledged that Connecticut could tax the Trust because the trustee resided in Connecticut and Connecticut provided protections to the trustee, the owner of the Trust. New York also has authority to tax the Trust’s accumulated wealth because the Trust was administered in New York and therefore New York afforded certain protections to the Trust.

Justice Kagan focused her questioning on whether the future distribution was really uncertain and indicated that because everything is done for the beneficiary’s benefit, the beneficiary’s state had “the greatest interest in taxation” as between the various states with connections to the Trust. Justice Kagan observed that North Carolina has a connection to the trust’s income because “[t]he person who is getting the benefit of this increase in the asset is only the beneficiary” and “the beneficiary, who's getting richer, is sitting in North Carolina.”


The Justices collectively asked questions about the practical and hypothetical application of state tax to trusts, but appeared to have different opinions regarding whether it is fundamentally fair for North Carolina to tax the Trust’s accumulated income, so there is a real possibility that this will be a split decision. We will continue to monitor this case.
1North Carolina Department of Revenue v. The Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust, _ _ _ U.S._ _ _ (2019) (No. 18-457).
2 Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust v. N.C. Dep’t of Revenue, No. 307PA15-2 (N.C., June 8, 2018).
3 Id. and Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust v. N.C. Dep’t of Revenue, No. COA15-896 (N.C. Ct. App., July 5, 2016).
4Id. at 10, quoting Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 USUS 298, 307, 112 S. Ct. 1904, 1910 (1992).  Although the physical presence rule of Quill was overturned by the US Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., No. 17-494 (June 21, 2018), shortly after the North Carolina Supreme Court issued its decision in this case, we believe the decision is still sound.  The court relied on Quill for the assertion that minimum contacts are required, not for its physical presence rule.
6Id. at 13.
8Id. at 18.
9 138 S. Ct. 2080, 2094 (2018).
10 Brief for South Dakota, Alaska, Nevada, and Texas as Amicus Curiae Supporting Respondent at 9, North Carolina Department of Revenue v. The Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust, _ _ _ U.S. _ _ _ (2019) (No. 18-457).

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at:

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.