Vermont Jury Verdict Awards $43.1 million For Spinal Cord Injury

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC

On June 28, 2013 a Chittenden County Vermont jury returned a $43.1 million dollar verdict in favor Dzemila Heco,  a 51 year old woman who suffered a C4-C5 spinal cord injury when her 1999 Dodge Neon was struck from behind at 35 miles per hour by another car while waiting at a red light.

The damage to Ms. Heco’s car was not particularly severe and she was wearing a seat belt, but her seat collapsed backward causing her to become unrestrained, resulting in this serious injury. The verdict was returned against Johnson Controls, which designed and manufactured the seats for Chrysler. Evidence at trial showed that Johnson Controls knew that the single-sided recliner mechanism on the seat was subject to failure in impacts of this kind and that Johnson had a patent for a two- sided recliner mechanism, costing an additional $7.16, which would not have failed.

What does this Vermont jury verdict mean for other serious personal injury claims ?

It is not unusual for a Vermont jury to return a verdict against a manufacturer in a “products liability” case like this one. What is unusual is the size of this verdict.  In the past, jury verdicts in Vermont have been lower than in many parts of the country, leading both plaintiffs and defendants to assume that a Vermont jury will not award eight figure verdicts in cases involving serious injuries-like brain and spinal cord injuries. This verdict upsets that assumption and has therefore received a great deal of attention in the Vermont legal and insurance communities. It has potential impact on all claims involving life altering injuries, especially brain and spinal cord injury claims.

The damages awarded by the jury included:

  • past medical bills and health care  ($621,171.33)
  • future medical bills and life care expenses ($26,522,032)
  • past loss of income ($355,024)
  • future loss of income ($1,247,935) and
  • past and future pain and suffering ($14,373,000). 

By all accounts,  a factor in the size of the verdict was Ms. Heco ‘s inspiring life story and strong character. She and her family lived in Bosnia before the siege of Sarajevo began in 1992. Her husband was killed in the conflict and Ms. Heco and her two sons escaped through the “Sarajevo Tunnel”  and spend six harrowing months in Croatia before being able to emigrate to the United States. Ms Heco worked three jobs supporting her family and did volunteer work before the accident.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.