“Waters of the U.S.” Rule Still Subject to Nationwide Stay, For Now

by Womble Bond Dickinson
Contact

Would you consider this a “Water of the United States” subject to the Clean Water Act?

Well think again, because under a new rule, even a dry streambed or channel could be considered a “Water of the U.S.” and thus subject to the Clean Water Act.  This broad definition could have a significant impact on many different industries including real estate, construction, manufacturing, mining, energy, agriculture and others.

The good news is that the Sixth Circuit issued a nationwide stay of this rule that was poised to broadly increase the government’s jurisdiction and regulation of waters and wetlands.  The stay will likely remain in place during the pendency of the Sixth Circuit lawsuit, which is currently mired in a battle over jurisdiction.

Background

On May 27, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released a final rule broadly defining “waters of the United States.” This is a crucial term because it determines which waters are governed by the Clean Water Act, and thus subject to the Act’s permitting requirements. This new definition encompasses many non-navigable waters and tributaries that flow only occasionally. If allowed to take effect, this defining rule will significantly impact numerous industries by increasing permitting requirements, resulting in greater expense and delays.

Tributaries

One major issue with the new rule is its definition of “tributaries,” which are automatically “waters of the United States,” i.e., jurisdictional waters, under the rule.  “Tributaries” are defined as any landscape feature with a bed, bank, and ordinary high water mark that contributes flow directly or indirectly to a navigable water, interstate water, or territorial sea.  Whether the origin of the water is natural, man-altered, or manmade does not matter.  It likewise does not matter if there are natural or manmade breaks, such as bridges, pipes, or boulder fields, so long as the bed, bank, and high water mark can be identified upstream from the break.  This means that ditches and land that are dry most of the year could be interpreted to meet the definition of tributary and be subject to the Clean Water Act.

Other Waters and the Significant Nexus Test

Under the new rule, waters that are not per se jurisdictional are considered “other waters” and will undergo a case-by-case analysis to determine whether they qualify as a “water of the United States.”  Such “other waters” may be regulated if the water itself, or when combined with other similarly situated waters in the region, has a “significant nexus” to traditional navigable waters, interstate waters, or territorial seas.  “Significant nexus” is defined to mean that the water “significantly affects the chemical, physical or biological integrity of” a traditional navigable water, interstate water, or territorial sea.  This vague test will likely expand federal jurisdiction and make it difficult to anticipate which “other waters” will be subject to the Clean Water Act.

In the permitting context, the “significant nexus” test will likely result in additional time and expense.  The onus is on the permit applicant to show that a water is non-jurisdictional.  To satisfy this burden under the “significant nexus” test, an applicant will need to, among other things, (1) identify the nearest navigable waters, interstate waters, and territorial seas; (2) identify other potentially “similarly situated” waters, which may not be located on the applicant’s property; (3) determine the size and function of the water and the “similarly situated” waters; and (4) hire a third party to conduct this work and prepare a detailed report.  Unfortunately, landowners are left with little guidance to determine precisely what constitutes a “significant nexus,” making it difficult and expensive to comply with the rule as a practical matter.

Litigation Challenging the Rule

The rule originally went into effect on August 28, 2015, and has been challenged in lawsuits across the country.  In August 2015, the North Dakota District Court stayed the enforcement of the rule in 13 states (Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming).  On October 9th, in a separate lawsuit filed in the Sixth

Circuit, the Court of Appeals concluded that the petitioners challenging the rule had demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, and thus stayed the rule nationwide.1

Also at issue in the Sixth Circuit case is a procedural question of whether the appellate court has original jurisdiction to decide challenges to the rule or if such cases must first be brought in district court.  On February 22, 2016, the Court ruled, in a fractured opinion, that it has jurisdiction to proceed with the lawsuit.  However, on February 29th, petitioners filed a petition for rehearing en banc, requesting that the Court reconsider its decision on the jurisdictional issue.  The nationwide stay should continue to remain in effect while the petition for rehearing is pending.

This jurisdictional question is important not merely as a matter of procedure, but because the Court’s ruling on jurisdiction will effectively decide whether the nationwide stay remains in effect.  If the Sixth Circuit does not stray from its original decision that it has jurisdiction, the stay will remain in place.  If, on the other hand, the Court grants the petition for rehearing and ultimately concludes that is does not have jurisdiction, the stay will be lifted and the rule will immediately go into effect in all but the 13 states involved in the North Dakota litigation.

Given these numerous legal challenges, the future of the rule is unclear.  If the rule is struck down by the courts, it will be a victory for numerous industries.  If the legal challenges to the rule fail, these industries will be faced with expanded Clean Water Act jurisdiction and permitting requirements that will most likely drive up the time and cost of doing business. 

1 Ohio v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs (In re E.P.A.), 803 F.3d 804 (6th Cir. 2015).

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Womble Bond Dickinson | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Womble Bond Dickinson
Contact
more
less

Womble Bond Dickinson on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.