Weekly Law Resume - April 19, 2013: It’s All In the Complaint: Triggering Equitable Indemnity Rights Against Public Entities

by Low, Ball & Lynch

Centex Homes, et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County
Court of Appeal, Fourth District (March 25, 2013)

Government Code section 901 provides that a cause of action for equitable indemnity or partial equitable indemnity accrues on the date “a defendant is served with the complaint giving rise to the defendant’s claim for equitable indemnity or partial indemnity against the public entity.” This case addresses whether a complaint must contain the claim that a defendant seeks equitable indemnity from a public entity in order to trigger § 901.

On April 20, 2009, the Element Owners Association (the “Association”) filed a complaint against Centrex alleging building code violations related to the construction of a condominium complex. The Association’s complaint did not include any violations related to the building’s plumbing or sewer systems. Two years later, on April 1, 2011, the Association sent Centrex a “Notice of Commencement of Legal Proceedings” pursuant to Civil Code § 910. In the notice and accompanying “Preliminary Statement of Claim,” filed simultaneously with the notice, the Association identified plumbing and sewer systems allegations including “cast iron waste piping is defective and has leaked.” Centrex’s own investigation in February 2012 revealed crystallization resulting from hydrochloric gasses emitting from the City’s sewer system. In March, 2012, Centrex presented the City of San Diego (the “City”) with a claim pursuant to § 900, et. seq. stating that the April, 2011 Notice of Commencement of Legal Proceedings and the Preliminary Statement of Claims represented the first time the Association alleged any plumbing and sewer system defects. The City denied Centrex’s claim on the grounds that it was not presented within “6 (six) months after the event or occurrence as required by law.”

In August, 2012, Centrex filed a motion for relief from the Government Code claims requirements and leave to file a cross-complaint against the City. Centrex argued that its cause of action for equitable indemnity against the City did not accrue until Centrex was served “with the complaint giving rise to the defendant’s claim,” which it argued was the date of the Notice of Commencement of Legal Proceedings on April 1, 2011. Centrex maintained that the notice is essentially the same as a complaint. Further, Centrex maintained that the one-year claim period, and not the six-month period in Government Code § 911.2 applied to this case. Thus, Centrex argued that its March 2012 claim to the City was within one year and therefore timely. In its opposition, the City conceded that the one-year presentation of claim period under § 911.2 applied; however, it argued that Centrex’s equitable indemnity rights accrued under § 901 at the time the Association filed its original complaint in April, 2009. In reply, Centrex noted that the April, 2009 complaint did not contain any allegations relating to plumbing or cast iron waste pipes to give rise to an equitable indemnity claim against the City. The trial court strictly construed § 901 and held that § 901 accrued when the Association filed its original complaint in April, 2009. In October, 2012, the Association filed a second amended complaint including statutory building standard violations related to plumbing and sewer issues. Centrex filed a writ of mandate requesting the Appellate Court vacate the trial court’s order.

The Appellate Court rejected the City’s argument that regardless of the complaint’s content, the filing of the Association’s initial complaint triggers the accrual of equitable indemnity causes of action under § 901. In coming to its conclusion, the Appellate Court agreed with prior courts in State v. Superior Court (1983) 143 Cal.App.3d 754 (Shortstop) and Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. County of Santa Clara (1986) 187 Cal.App.3d 480, that the plain language of § 901 provides that a cause of action for equitable indemnity against a public entity accrues “upon the service of the complaint that contains the cause of action for which indemnity is sought.” In this case, the April, 2009 complaint did not contain any allegations that could be construed as violations of building standards related to cast iron waste lines, which were the claims Centrex sought equitable indemnity from the City. The Appellate Court noted that the City’s contention that an original complaint always gives rise to equitable indemnity claims, regardless of the complaint’s contents, would result in absurd outcomes. As an example, a defendant brought into a case more than a year after the filing of the original complaint would lose its right to file a cross-complaint against a public entity before the defendant was ever aware of the litigation. Further, the Court found that the City misapplied the Greyhound decision, which rejected a “late-discovery exception” to § 901, and that the legislative history quoted by the City did not seem to support its position that the original complaint triggers the accrual of a defendants equitable indemnity claims under §901. Accordingly, the Appellate Court held that the April, 2009 complaint did not give rise to the equitable indemnity claim against the City.

In remanding the case, the Appellate Court held that Centrex was mistaken that a Notice of Commencement of Legal Proceedings acted essentially as a complaint for § 901 purposes. The Court clarified that equitable indemnity rights under § 901 do not accrue until the “service of the complaint giving rise to the defendant’s claim for equitable indemnity.” Therefore, the Association’s second amended complaint, which included plumbing and sewer systems allegations, filed in October, 2012 triggered the accrual of Centrex’s equitable indemnity claims. On remand, the trial court was instructed to allow Centrex to file a cross-complaint against the City for equitable indemnity.


This decision provides defendants with some clarity and certainty that their equitable indemnity rights against public entities do not automatically accrue upon the initial filing of a plaintiff’s complaint. However, given the often vague and ambiguous pleading found in complaints, defendants should not hesitate to bring a claim under Government Code § 911.2 if the complaint in any way implicates the possibility of cross-complaining against a public entity on equitable indemnity grounds. For public entities, when confronted with cross-complaints for equitable indemnity that seem clearly outside of the six-month or one-year presentation of claim periods, further attention should be given to when the complaint that actually gave rise to the equitable indemnity cause of action was served, before rejecting the claim.

For a copy of the complete decision see:


Written by:

Low, Ball & Lynch

Low, Ball & Lynch on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.