Weekly Law Resume - June 21, 2012: General Contractor Protected from Claims by Injured Employee of Independent Contractor

by Low, Ball & Lynch

    [author: : Neil P. Cherubin]


Brian Brannan, et al. v. Lathrop Construction Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeal, First District (June 12, 2012

This case is the latest decision limiting the liability of a general contractor for jobsite injuries suffered by an employee of a subcontractor.

Plaintiff Brian Brannan (“Plaintiff”) was a journeyman bricklayer, working for Bratton Masonery (“Bratton”) at the El Cerrito High School construction site. Defendant Lathrop Construction Associates, Inc. (“Lathrop”) was the general contractor for the project, and hired Bratton to perform masonry work at the site.

Lathrop hired another subcontractor, M. Perez Company, Inc. dba Henley & Company (“Henley”), to perform plaster work on the site. Lathrop’s subcontract agreements required each of the subcontractors (Bratton and Henley) to comply with all federal and state safety requirements, to comply with Lathrop’s safety procedures, and to maintain a safety program on the construction site. Lathrop was in charge of coordination of the work on the site, and had the authority to stop any subcontractor’s work for a safety issue. Each subcontractor also had the authority to stop its own work for a safety issue.

In coordinating and sequencing the subcontractor work, Lathrop determined that Henley would perform the plastering work and then remove its scaffold before Bratton started the masonry work. However, Henley left a portion of the scaffold in place at the request of a third subcontractor. On the day of the incident, Bratton’s employees, including Plaintiff, were working in an area where the scaffolding was located, and it was raining. Bratton’s foreman did not have safety concerns about the rain on the day of the incident, or about Bratton employees working around the scaffold.

Plaintiff slipped on the wet scaffolding and sustained injuries. At the time, he was trying to gain access to the area underneath the scaffold to lay a brick veneer. Plaintiff sued Lathrop, alleging causes of action for negligence and premises liability.

Lathrop successfully moved for summary judgment. The trial court ruled that while Lathrop was responsible for scheduling and coordination and had authority to order the scaffolding removed, no issue of fact was presented to establish that Lathrop exercised control “in a way that affirmatively contributed to Plaintiff’s injuries.”

On appeal, Plaintiff argued that Lathrop (1) scheduled the work, (2) permitted the scaffold to remain in place, and (3) did not stop the work because of rain. According to Plaintiff, each of these raised triable issues of fact as to whether Lathrop “affirmatively contributed” to Plaintiff’s injuries.

The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s ruling. Under the Privette-Toland Doctrine, an employee of an independent contractor cannot recover from the party that hired the independent contractor. As the Supreme Court has noted, when a party hires an independent contractor, it delegates tort liability owed to the independent contractor’s employee to the independent contractor.

The doctrine is underscored by the workers’ compensation system. If an employee of an independent contractor is injured on the job, workers’ compensation is available to remedy the injury. No additional remedy against the party that hired the independent contractor is necessary. Workers’ compensation also protects the independent contractor from liability to the injured employee. Therefore, it would be illogical and unfair to subject the hiring party to greater liability than the independent contractor, as the independent contractor has greater control over the injured employee.

An exception to this general rule was described in Hooker v. Department of Transportation (2002) 27 Cal.4th 198, where the general contractor affirmatively contributed to the injuries of an independent contractor’s employee. The court in Hooker held that retaining control over safety conditions was not a sufficient basis for liability on its own. Liability is only appropriate when the hirer is directly liable for the injury as a result of its own affirmative behavior, and not merely vicariously liable for the acts of the independent contractor.

Applying the Privette-Toland Doctrine and the holding in Hooker to the present case, the Appellate Court found that Lathrop’s scheduling of the work and permitting the scaffold to remain raised no triable issue of fact. Lathrop did not direct Bratton or Plaintiff, and Bratton never requested that the scaffold be removed. Merely failing to exercise the power to compel safer procedures does not, without more, constitute an affirmative act supporting liability. Furthermore, Lathrop did not have knowledge of the specific safety issue causing injury to Plaintiff. The failure to call a rain day is also insufficient. Lathrop’s authority to stop work was not exclusive, and Bratton had authority to call a rain day on its own.


This case clarifies the general rule of non-liability for the hirer of an independent contractor and gives much needed guidance in determining what constitutes “affirmative contribution” to establish liability. The Appellate Court strengthened the doctrine’s protection of general contractors by limiting the scope of its exception: artful pleading cannot transform authority to act into an affirmative act causing injury. Retaining control over safety conditions, without more, does not subject a general contractor to liability, as long as it is not exclusive control.

For a copy of the complete decision see:



Written by:

Low, Ball & Lynch

Low, Ball & Lynch on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.