WeStillChat: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction Temporarily Halting Trump Administration’s Ban

Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C.

Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C.

This past Friday, September 18, 2020, the Trump administration released its plan to ban Chinese-owned WeChat and TikTok from U.S. mobile app stores. The Executive Order (EO) allegedly responds to a risk that the Chinese government has access to millions of American users’ personal data through the use of these apps.

TikTok-loving Gen-Z’ers are only a portion of interested parties who will be affected by these bans. As of this morning, Monday, September 21, 2020, U.S. companies were to be prohibited from processing transactions or transferring funds for WeChat. The EO also prohibits companies from offering a variety of internet hosting services for the app, or using the app’s code in other U.S. software or services. In other words, the Trump administration is not taking the Chinese tech giant down directly, but rather, it is cutting WeChat off at its base—a base consisting of U.S. companies.

The Trump administration gave TikTok a more distant November 12 deadline to assure the administration the app does not pose a U.S. national security threat. TikTok’s November 12thdeadline subverts arguments that the administration’s true intention is to silence a large social media platform prior to the November 3rd general election.

For a more detailed account of the Executive Order, see https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/18/business/trump-tik-tok-wechat-ban.html

Friday’s decision demonstrates the give and take of the law and justice: Opposition argues this prohibitory measure infringes on Americans’ First Amendment Free Speech rights; those in favor argue this is a necessary executive step in ensuring Americans’ data privacy protection. Both principles are firmly rooted in the U.S. Constitution, and neither associates itself with one particular political party.

This is precisely the issue U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler in Northern California addressed when she granted WeChat users’ request for a preliminary injunction on Saturday. In finding a likelihood WeChat users will succeed on the merits, Judge Beeler halted the Trump Administration’s ability to enforce the EO until its constitutionality under the First Amendment is fully litigated. It is unclear whether the Trump administration will appeal the order.

Although this preliminary injunction grants WeChat users additional time with the application, the Executive Order is merely held on pause.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C.

Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.