What’s the Standard for “Commercially Reasonable” in a Commercially Unreasonable World (Health Crisis)? Part II

White and Williams LLP

White and Williams LLP

Yesterday, in a turn of events that struck a hopeful chord for mezzanine lenders, New York County Supreme Court Judge Frank P. Nervo vacated his April 30, 2020 order which temporarily halted the sale of mezzanine loan collateral owned by the borrower, 1248 Associates Mezz II LLC, under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”). Judge Nervo’s previous order had both halted the sale, and ruled that the borrower’s request to have its case considered on the merits was “essential."

The borrower’s argument had been supported, in part, by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s Executive Order No. 202.8, dated March 20, 2020, declaring a moratorium on all residential and commercial foreclosures, by stating, in the pertinent part, that "[t]here shall be no enforcement of either an eviction of any tenant residential or commercial, or a foreclosure of any residential or commercial property for a period of ninety days.”

In yesterday’s decision, Judge Nervo rejected the borrower’s contention that the Executive Order applied in the foreclosure of a junior mezzanine loan, on the basis that the sale is subject to the UCC and is a non-judicial proceeding, unlike a New York state foreclosure proceeding, and the Executive Order itself did not address non-judicial proceedings. Notably, on May 7, 2020, Governor Cuomo issued subsequent Executive Order 202.28, which, in part, extended the existing moratorium on the foreclosure of residential and commercial mortgages, a word not contained in the previous Executive Order, providing further clarification on this issue.

As the nature and timing of the default under the subject mezzanine loan was not in dispute between the parties, Judge Nervo further rejected the borrower’s arguments as to the nature and timing of the sale having been designed to take advantage of the current COVID- 19 crisis. Judge Nervo held that such arguments were “speculative”, and that the borrower’s request for relief relied upon “anticipated economic damage” which could result from such a sale. As the borrower had failed to demonstrate that the holding of such a UCC sale would cause it irreparable harm. Instead, the holding provided that the appropriate recourse in the event that such a sale ultimately caused the borrower a loss of its investment opportunity would be a cause of action for monetary damages at that time.

The issuance of Executive Order 202.28, coupled with the May 18, 2020 decision create a positive precedent for mezzanine lenders in seeking to enforce their rights through a UCC sale, in New York, even in the current environment created by COVID-19. It is now clear that for the time being, any current foreclosure moratoriums in New York do not apply to mezzanine loan foreclosures.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© White and Williams LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

White and Williams LLP

White and Williams LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.