What’s Driving the US Antitrust Agencies?

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

As antitrust veterans know, no matter how much a new administration may want to change how antitrust is enforced, the bulk of the agencies’ enforcement agenda remains relatively constant from one administration to the next. Overheated rhetoric notwithstanding, most enforcement decisions are driven by the application of widely shared principles to the facts, with the result that the cases that get brought (or not) usually have more to do with the course of events – what deals are proposed, what misconduct detected – than the agencies’ current enforcement agenda.

Over time, however, trends emerge. With two years of Obama administration antitrust enforcement now on display, we have a sufficient record on which to draw some reliable conclusions about what makes this administration’s approach to antitrust enforcement different, and what those differences portend for the next few years.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.