When Is Internet Speech Protected Petitioning Activity? Federal Court Grants Anti-SLAPP Motion In FIRE CIDER Trademark Suit

by Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition

On May 12, 2016, the District of Massachusetts held that that an online campaign in support of the cancellation of a registered trademark (FIRE CIDER) was protected petitioning activity, even though the campaign was organized and supported by the trademark owner’s competitors. Because the campaign activity was protected, the Court granted the competitors’ anti-SLAPP special motion to dismiss certain claims.  The case, Shire City Herbals v. Blue, provides insight into the applicability of the Massachusetts anti-SLAPP statute to internet activity.


“SLAPP” stands for “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation,” often defined as meritless lawsuits brought in order to deter or punish a citizen for petitioning the government, in other words for exercising his or her political or legal rights. Anti-SLAPP statutes offer protection against such suits, usually by providing for expedited dismissal and attorneys’ fees.  If you are looking for more comprehensive background on the Massachusetts anti-SLAPP statute (codified at Chapter 231, Section 59H of the Massachusetts General Laws) or anti-SLAPP legislation generally, you can find my take on that here.

When is Internet Speech Petitioning Activity?

So when does internet speech qualify as petitioning activity?  The Massachusetts statute defines petitioning activity to include not just statements made directly to government bodies, but also those “made in connection with an issue under consideration or review” and those that are “reasonably likely to enlist public participation in an effort to effect such consideration.” Two prior cases help define how these definitions may or may not encompass internet speech.

The first case is MacDonald v. Paton, in which an Athol selectman filed a defamation suit against the operator of a website (the “Athonics Home Page”) which had referred to the selectman as a “nazi.” The Massachusetts Appeals Court determined that the website was a public forum facilitating the discussion of issues related to Athol town governance, that it was interactive in that it incorporated contributions from Athol citizens. Thus, although the speech in question was not made directly to the government, it was still considered protected petitioning activity because it took the form of a “technological version of a meeting of citizens on the Town Green.” The anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss was granted, and the selectman was ordered to pay the defendant’s attorneys’ fees.

The outcome was very different in Cadle Co. v. Schlictmann. Attorney Jan Schlichtmann (played by John Travolta in A Civil Action) set up a website in which he discussed the “fraudulent” and “illegal” activities of a certain debt collection company with which he had an ongoing legal dispute. These statements, some of which Schlictmann had made previously to government agencies, were accompanied by a solicitation encouraging “victims” to contact Schlictmann to retain his services. The debt collection company sued for defamation, and Schlictmann filed an anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss.  The Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) held that Schlictmann’s website was not petitioning activity because, although it discussed matters that had attracted government attention, its principal “design” was to attract new clients. Perhaps most importantly, unlike the website in MacDonald, its design was not interactive. A viewer of the website had no opportunity to contribute his or her own opinion; the only way they could participate was to hire Schlictmann.

The Fire Cider Case

That leads us to Fire Cider, an internet speech case which involved commercial motives, as in Cadle, but interactive form, as in MacDonald.

In 2012, Shire City Herbals obtained a federal trademark registration for FIRE CIDER in connection with the sale of dietary supplement beverages (specifically a concoction of apple cider vinegar, citrus, honey and spices). Shire’s efforts to enforce its mark rankled competitors, who claimed that the drink was a common herbal remedy that had been called “Fire Cider” for decades, and thus the term was generic. The competitors began an online campaign, the ultimate goal of which was the cancellation of Shire’s FIRE CIDER mark. This included a change.org petition, a freefirecider.com webpage and various social media pages and accounts, which the defendants used to organize support.

These activities did not directly propose commercial transactions, but according to Shire they involved a commercial component. For instance, the defendants allegedly linked their commercial websites to the campaign website, which encouraged consumers to download pre-written form letters to send to retailers. These letter demanded that Shire products be replaced with alternative products until the FIRE CIDER mark is abandoned or cancelled. The website, in turn, provided a list of acceptable alternatives, including products sold by the defendants and by third parties. This and similar activities allegedly resulted in Shire products being replaced by the defendants’ products on some store shelves.

In connection with these activities, the defendants also brought a pro se petition before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to cancel the FIRE CIDER mark. Shire responded by filing suit in the District of Massachusetts, asserting trademark infringement and several non-trademark claims (including trade libel, tortious interference and trade disparagement) based on allegedly false statements made in connection with the online campaign. The defendants filed an anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss the non-trademark claims on the grounds that they were based solely on petitioning activity.

The Court found that the defendants’ activity constituted protected petitioning and allowed the anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss the non-trademark claims. Even though the online statements were not made directly to the government, the Court found that they were “reasonably likely to encourage consideration or review of an issue” by the government and “reasonably likely to enlist public participation in an effort to effect such consideration.” The Court acknowledged that the defendants “may have obtained some commercial benefits” in connection with this petitioning activity, but that “it is difficult to see how these commercial benefits could be considered evidence indicating Defendant’s [petitioning] statements are secretly designed to promote their own products or serve as cover for the real purpose of selling them.”

Form Matters, Motive Does Not

The most obvious lesson we can take away from these cases is that, while commercial motive is not relevant to whether internet speech is protected petitioning activity, the form of that internet speech is very important. In practical terms, whether internet speech is considered to have the form of petitioning activity will depend on (a) whether the speech is interactive or a one-way communication; (b) whether there are participants in the interactive discussion other than those who will directly benefit commercially; and (c) whether the proposal of a commercial transaction, if any, is direct and immediate on the one hand (e.g., ‘call now for legal representation’), or on the other hand will require additional steps (e.g., ‘download this form letter, send it to your retailer, and direct them to a list of alternatives.’). It is still too early to create a comprehensive map of the application of anti-SLAPP legislation to internet speech, but these cases indicate that why you say something is not as important as how it is said.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition

Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright & Unfair Competition on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.