Will "hot-tubbing" catch on in England and Wales?

by Dentons


The usual procedure in trials in the courts of England and Wales is that when hearing expert evidence, each expert witness is sworn into the witness box individually and,  then each one is cross-examined in turn by the opposing counsel. Since 1 April 2013, however, a judge can, at any stage of the proceedings, order concurrent expert evidence to be given at trial pursuant to paragraph 11 of CPR Practice Direction 35 (also known as "hot-tubbing") where  expert witnesses (of the same discipline) are sworn into the witness box at the same time. The judge then engages in discussion with the experts dealing with the issues in dispute. The parties' representatives may also join the discussion and, subject to the judge's permission being obtained, put questions to the experts.

The procedure is commonly used in Australia, but has not gained as much support in England and Wales. The question is why? This article considers some of the advantages and disadvantages of hot-tubbing and its future in England and Wales.


The purpose of hot-tubbing is to enable a discussion to take place between the experts which assists the judge working through (1) the issues in dispute and (2) each expert's opinion and reasoning. Open questions are used to allow the experts to discuss the issues, which differs significantly from the questioning technique used in cross-examination. It is believed that experts are likely to be more willing to concede points in hot-tubbing than they would be in cross-examination, where experts can be defensive.   

As discussions are led by the judge, from an early stage the judge needs in-depth knowledge, requiring  the judge to thoroughly read the documents and to understand the issues in dispute prior to the trial.

For hot-tubbing to be effective, there is a lot of groundwork that the lawyers and experts need to undertake. The advantage is that there is greater focus on the issues in dispute and parties may be able to narrow the issues in the lead-up to trial.  

Finally, supporters of hot-tubbing believe it reduces the time for expert evidence at trial and therefore the length and costs of trial.


The usual process allows counsel to cross-examine the opposing party's expert and also re-examine its own expert to deal with issues arising out of cross-examination. Arguably, counsel is better placed to question experts, having extensively prepared for the trial. By not cross-examining experts, counsel may be deprived of making some of the points and may be unable to take the experts and the judge to certain documents to make those points.

It may be hard to determine when hot-tubbing is appropriate. Some commentators have stated that hot-tubbing is not necessarily appropriate in large cases. In one of the largest cases in the Federal Court of Australia, the judge did not use hot-tubbing for the competition expert evidence as there were six experts (Seven Network Limited v. News Limited [2009] FCAFC 166). However, in the recent case between Samsung and Apple, also at the Federal Court of Australia, hot-tubbing was used despite there being numerous experts (Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v. Apple Inc. [2011] FCAFC 156). There is, therefore, no rule as to when hot-tubbing is appropriate. Judges will need to assess the appropriateness of hot-tubbing on a case-by-case basis, and without experience this may be difficult.  

The aim of hot-tubbing is to reduce the length of the trial (as occurred in the Samsung/Apple case).  But this reduction was due to the strict time limits imposed and it did not reduce the overall costs. Significant time and resources went into the preparation for the hot-tubbing, agreeing joint questions, various conferences with experts and joint reports. Parties were also encouraged to narrow the issues for determination, which meant further work for lawyers and experts, increasing costs.  Therefore, although the trial costs were reduced, the overall costs were high.

In England and Wales, where costs budgets are approved at an early stage of the claim (usually the first costs and case management conference), it may be difficult to estimate the extent of the work necessary in preparing for hot-tubbing. The volume of work will depend on the number of issues in dispute and the extent of the inter-party discussions, which will not be known until later on. Although there are provisions to revise costs budgets, these are limited.  

Finally, giving evidence is commonly described as stressful and daunting. Even a leading expert in their field may get nervous in the witness box. The issue of hearing experts together is that dominating personalities may take over in the witness box.  

Hot-tubbing in England and Wales

In Harrison and others v. Shepherd Homes Ltd and others [2011] EWHC 1811 (TCC), the usual procedure was followed, but after the cross-examination of the experts there was a process of concurrent expert evidence to which the parties consented. The latter process helped the judge by highlighting the extent of agreement and the limited differences. This example of  hot-tubbing was used prior to the introduction of the process into the CPR on 1 April 2013.

On 26 June 2016, Jackson LJ gave a lecture on the subject of hot-tubbing and its future. In the lecture, Jackson LJ quoted a TCC circuit judge who uses hot-tubbing "regularly" and is very much in favour of the process.

Jackson LJ also made reference to the recent case of Streetmap. EU Ltd v. Google Inc. [2016] EWHC 253 (Ch) and stated that Mr Justice Roth found that hot-tubbing helped him highlight the areas of disagreement between the experts. Mr Justice Roth stated in his judgment that it "led to a significant measure of agreement" and "a constructive exchange which considerably shortened the time taken by the economic evidence at trial".

The future

Despite the above cases, there still appears to be a lack of support for hot-tubbing in England and Wales. This may be because, upon detailed consideration, practitioners are of the opinion that hot-tubbing is not beneficial. Alternatively, it may be because the legal industry is slow to take up change and has not considered it in any detail. Regardless of the reasons why, however, it is now on the legal agenda.   

Over the course of 18 months from April 2016, the Civil Litigation Review Working Group is reviewing various discrete topics, one of which is the topic of "hot-tubbing". To start the process, a survey has been launched to find out about the use of hot-tubbing. At the end of the review, Jackson LJ is hopeful that improvements to the procedure will be proposed.  

Jackson LJ predicts that hot-tubbing will become more common in England and Wales. In his view, hot-tubbing is "a cost saving procedure" and he recommends that it should be piloted in England and Wales in cases where all parties (the parties, lawyers, experts and the judge) consent.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dentons | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Dentons on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.